Donesafe is Health, Safety and Environment software that connects a management system from workers in the field to the management team in the boardroom, Donesafe was acquired by Health & Safety Institute (HSI) in February 2020.
$5,600
per year
SAI360
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
SAI360 merges GRC software and Ethics & Compliance Learning to enhance risk management. Its scalable solutions have supported global organizations for 25+ years.
N/A
Pricing
HSI Donesafe
SAI360
Editions & Modules
Small
$5,600.00
per year
Medium
$12,000.00
per year
Large
$24,000.00
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HSI Donesafe
SAI360
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$600
No setup fee
Additional Details
Based on a per-worker basis - A worker is anyone in an organization. By having all users in the system, Donesafe can create more intelligent permissions and escalation settings, create unique user experiences, and deliver ‘just in time’ learning and notifications.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HSI Donesafe
SAI360
Considered Both Products
HSI Donesafe
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose HSI Donesafe
Donesafe has better offline capabilities in their native mobile apps making it hassle free for the employees in the field where they might have spotty internet connections.The forms are not as flexible in EHS Insight compared to Donesafe. EHS Insight seems to be a better fit …
Knocked it out of the park, in functionality and usability, particularly in the configuration at the back end. Looks good and customisable to meet branding and look and feel of the business.
Archer was very similar to SAI360 in cost and features. Has a more modern look and feel and more task functionality. The price point was very similar. Didn't choose them as our existing usage is in an On-Prem version and support from our in-house IT team was not able to be …
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.
Easy to use: The solution is easy for our people which encourages use.
Easy to design: We are able to configure our version to align with existing processes. We can do it our way which creates greater ownership of the process.
Transparency: Once the information is in the system, it is easy to create insights and learn where our opportunities lay.
Compliant: It creates a central repository of evidence to demonstrate compliance whenever required.
Internal Quality Check. I think this is the most prominent area BWise should improve on. Currently they lack internal Quality Check/Review.
Internal dialogue among employees. When various consultants are involved in the same project, their communication and updating each-other could be a bit stronger.
Inclusion of content. The application could benefit considerably from including some out-of-the-box content (e.g. COSO principles, Risk catalogs, etc.).
Risk Workshop functionality. This is one of the main functionalities that allows integration among different areas of an organization. However, it comes pretty much "take it or leave it"; it's almost not customizable.
Consultants' transparency. When an organization requests a particular design of the application or solicits changes to such design, it would be great if BWise consultants could always and more thoroughly advise on the implications of these changes, design to the organization's strategic objectives and ultimate target.
Product features. Application has room for improving its programming, e.g. providing internal checks when creating/answering an issue/finding (for instance, remedy implementation date cannot be before the recommendation response date or the recommendation creation date). Another example would be the possibility of automatic periodic followup (e.g. every 1 month until completion).
Easy to configure at the back end with simple to use click and drop setup. Easy to use interface for users as intuitive as to where to complete and input or upload.
Donesafe has better offline capabilities in their native mobile apps making it hassle free for the employees in the field where they might have spotty internet connections.The forms are not as flexible in EHS Insight compared to Donesafe. EHS Insight seems to be a better fit for smaller teams which doesn't move a lot.
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).