HSI Donesafe vs. SAI360

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HSI Donesafe
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Donesafe is Health, Safety and Environment software that connects a management system from workers in the field to the management team in the boardroom, Donesafe was acquired by Health & Safety Institute (HSI) in February 2020.
$5,600
per year
SAI360
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
SAI360 merges GRC software and Ethics & Compliance Learning to enhance risk management. Its scalable solutions have supported global organizations for 25+ years.N/A
Pricing
HSI DonesafeSAI360
Editions & Modules
Small
$5,600.00
per year
Medium
$12,000.00
per year
Large
$24,000.00
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HSI DonesafeSAI360
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$600 No setup fee
Additional DetailsBased on a per-worker basis - A worker is anyone in an organization. By having all users in the system, Donesafe can create more intelligent permissions and escalation settings, create unique user experiences, and deliver ‘just in time’ learning and notifications.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HSI DonesafeSAI360
Considered Both Products
HSI Donesafe
Chose HSI Donesafe
Donesafe has better offline capabilities in their native mobile apps making it hassle free for the employees in the field where they might have spotty internet connections.The forms are not as flexible in EHS Insight compared to Donesafe. EHS Insight seems to be a better fit …
Chose HSI Donesafe
Knocked it out of the park, in functionality and usability, particularly in the configuration at the back end.
Looks good and customisable to meet branding and look and feel of the business.
SAI360
Chose SAI360
Archer was very similar to SAI360 in cost and features. Has a more modern look and feel and more task functionality. The price point was very similar. Didn't choose them as our existing usage is in an On-Prem version and support from our in-house IT team was not able to be …
Chose SAI360
Also evaluated, and implemented SAP GRC Process control for Continuous Control Monitoring in SAP. Initially selected BWise for cost and flexibility.
Chose SAI360
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
Features
HSI DonesafeSAI360
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
HSI Donesafe
-
Ratings
SAI360
7.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Common repository of GRC items00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Risk management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
GRC policy management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Incident management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HSI DonesafeSAI360
Small Businesses
BrightHR
BrightHR
Score 7.6 out of 10
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BrightHR
BrightHR
Score 7.6 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HSI DonesafeSAI360
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
HSI DonesafeSAI360
Likelihood to Recommend
Donesafe is suited to any business due to its customisability and flexibility. There are no situations we have found as yet where it is not suited.
Read full review
The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy to use: The solution is easy for our people which encourages use.
  • Easy to design: We are able to configure our version to align with existing processes. We can do it our way which creates greater ownership of the process.
  • Transparency: Once the information is in the system, it is easy to create insights and learn where our opportunities lay.
  • Compliant: It creates a central repository of evidence to demonstrate compliance whenever required.
Read full review
  • Customized unified design platform
  • Modules that fit your organization
  • Low technology involvement with information department.
  • Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
  • Single sign-on web-based applications
Read full review
Cons
  • Timely response from the contractor's support team.
  • Provision of more in depth training to the Admins.
  • Provision of more in depth training for the Admins to troubleshoot from the back end.
  • Constant follow up and checks done by the contractor after the launch would've been helpful.
Read full review
  • Internal Quality Check. I think this is the most prominent area BWise should improve on. Currently they lack internal Quality Check/Review.
  • Internal dialogue among employees. When various consultants are involved in the same project, their communication and updating each-other could be a bit stronger.
  • Inclusion of content. The application could benefit considerably from including some out-of-the-box content (e.g. COSO principles, Risk catalogs, etc.).
  • Risk Workshop functionality. This is one of the main functionalities that allows integration among different areas of an organization. However, it comes pretty much "take it or leave it"; it's almost not customizable.
  • Consultants' transparency. When an organization requests a particular design of the application or solicits changes to such design, it would be great if BWise consultants could always and more thoroughly advise on the implications of these changes, design to the organization's strategic objectives and ultimate target.
  • Product features. Application has room for improving its programming, e.g. providing internal checks when creating/answering an issue/finding (for instance, remedy implementation date cannot be before the recommendation response date or the recommendation creation date). Another example would be the possibility of automatic periodic followup (e.g. every 1 month until completion).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
BWIse is very flexible, and an affordable GRC tool.
Read full review
Usability
Easy to configure at the back end with simple to use click and drop setup. Easy to use interface for users as intuitive as to where to complete and input or upload.
Read full review
Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
BWise support is knowledgeable and responsive. Bug fixes and development are also timely and ongoing.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The main issues were managing the internal conflicts and competing objectives, rather than the capability and implementation of BWise itself.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Donesafe has better offline capabilities in their native mobile apps making it hassle free for the employees in the field where they might have spotty internet connections.The forms are not as flexible in EHS Insight compared to Donesafe. EHS Insight seems to be a better fit for smaller teams which doesn't move a lot.
Read full review
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Donesafe has myself and my organization a lot of time through no longer having manual tasks around safety.
  • It has mitigated infectious disease risks, through the effective and simple to use module
Read full review
  • The system is costly for the initial setup
  • Does help to mitigate risk and keep the vendors and internal departments from becoming non-compliant.
  • One license for all users
  • Easy to manage employee's security access
Read full review
ScreenShots

HSI Donesafe Screenshots

Screenshot of where to automate manual workplace safety tasks, in Donesafe's "IF this THEN that" Automations EngineScreenshot of Donesafe Workflows.Screenshot of an example of the visual dashboards that turn real-time data into valuable insightsScreenshot of the mobile app, which is where to instant changes to Donesafe smart forms and 30 response type to choose fromScreenshot of Global Customer BrandsScreenshot of a visual dashboard.