Dovetail vs. Solid User Tests
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dovetail | Score8.6 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Dovetail, headquartered in Sydney, aims to enable the world to create better products and services through deep customer understanding. Dovetail states they empower 45,000+ people, from agencies to universities to Fortune 100 companies, to make sense of their customer research in one collaborative research platform. | $0 for a single individual, channel, and research project |
Solid User Tests | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Solid is a user testing solution featuring Anna, a virtual avatar, that moderates tests for the user. Solid allows researchers to run tests where testers don't behave unnaturally. They are not told to read scripts or think aloud in unusual sequences. This hurts their testing experience. Instead, Solid gives them space to go at their own pace, and to think aloud only when they become silent. Solid enables users to test prototypes, websites and native apps, or anything as long as a… | $252 one-time fee per study |
| Dovetail | Solid User Tests | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Discount available for annual billing on the Professional plan. | Solid offers two different payment plans: - per study: one-time fee - per user: monthly or yearly fee A per-user payment plan is scalable for up to 6 researchers (editors) | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Dovetail | Solid User Tests | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
90% Would buy again 45 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
89% Delivers good value for the price 33 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
90% Happy with the feature set 45 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
91% Implementation went as expected 32 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Dovetail | Solid User Tests | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Optimal Score8.5 out of 10 | Dovetail Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Optimal Score8.5 out of 10 | Optimal Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Dovetail | Solid User Tests | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.4 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.1 | - |
| Usability | 6.7 | - |
| Availability | 9.0 | - |
| Performance | 7.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.9 | - |
| Online Training | 8.2 | - |
| Configurability | 5.6 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 5.6 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 6.9 | - |
| Professional Services | 5.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 5.9 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 5.2 | - |
| Dovetail | Solid User Tests | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Online Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Dovetail Screenshots | Solid User Tests Screenshots |











