Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Engine Yard
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Engine Yard is a platform-as-a-service solution allowing developers to plan, build, deploy, and manage applications in the cloud. Engine Yard also provides services for deployment, managing AWS, supporting databases, and microservices & container development.
$800
Per Month Per Cluster
Heroku Platform
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
The Heroku Platform, now from Salesforce, is a platform-as-a-service based on a managed container system, with integrated data services and ecosystem for deploying modern apps. It takes an app-centric approach for software delivery, integrated with developer tools and workflows. It’s three main tool are: Heroku Developer Experience (DX), Heroku Operational Experience (OpEx), and Heroku Runtime. Heroku Developer Experience (DX) Developers deploy directly from tools like…
$85
per month
Java Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Oracle offers the Java Cloud Service, a PaaS supporting the fast and easy development of Java applications.
$0.15
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
Pricing
Engine YardHeroku PlatformOracle Java Cloud
Editions & Modules
Platform
$800.00
Per Month Per Cluster
Production
$25.00
per month
Advanced
$250.00
per month
Standard Edition
$0.15485
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
Enterprise Edition
$0.15485
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
High Performance Edition
$0.3871
Comparison Price (/vCPU)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Engine YardHeroku PlatformJava Cloud
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Engine YardHeroku PlatformOracle Java Cloud
Considered Multiple Products
Engine Yard
Chose Engine Yard
More closely aligns to native AWS
Heroku Platform
Chose Heroku Platform
You get much more machine for your money with EC2, but it requires much more time to set up and maintain, at least as it stood two years ago when we stopped using it. We spoke with Engine Yard when selecting Heroku, and they're good folks. They offer much more power and …
Chose Heroku Platform
I have not evaluated Engine Yard in years, but at the time the starting price point and supported integrations could not begin to compete with Heroku.
Chose Heroku Platform
  • EngineYard is much more similar to Heroku than the other two services I've compared it to. Frankly, I don't see much advantage of EngineYard over Heroku - EngineYard feels a little more "bare metal" than Heroku and it's easy to get to log into a "real server," but it's …
Java Cloud

No answer on this topic

Features
Engine YardHeroku PlatformOracle Java Cloud
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Engine Yard
-
Ratings
Heroku Platform
7.2
44 Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle Java Cloud
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings6.027 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings7.044 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.043 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings6.030 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings7.043 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings6.042 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings9.039 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings9.038 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings8.042 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings7.039 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings7.044 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Engine YardHeroku PlatformOracle Java Cloud
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Oracle Java SE
Oracle Java SE
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Oracle Java SE
Oracle Java SE
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Engine YardHeroku PlatformOracle Java Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(47 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.5
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(17 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(19 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Engine YardHeroku PlatformOracle Java Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Engine Yard
It is best for rapidly getting your application to the cloud without worrying about standing up cloud infrastructure
Read full review
Salesforce
Heroku is very well suited for startups looking to get a server stack up and running quickly. There is little to no overhead when managing your instances. However, you'll need a background in basic DevOps or system management to make sure everything is set up correctly. In addition, it's easy to accidentally go crazy on pricing. Make sure you're only creating the server instances you need to run the base application and set up an auto-scaler plugin to handle peaks.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle Java Cloud is especially appropriate for moderate to complex Java applications. Due to BYOL licensing, it is also works well when you are planning to do dev and test in-house and then deploy it on Oracle Java Cloud. It is not well suited for simple Java applications due to the cost of Oracle Java Cloud. Simple applications don't need the fully managed aspect of Oracle Java Cloud.
Read full review
Pros
Engine Yard
  • Quick deployments
  • Easily integrate your code from GitHub
  • Ability to recover site quickly to different zone when AWS has a widespread outage
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Heroku has a very simple deployment model, making it easy to get your application up-and-running with minimal effort. We can focus on our efforts the unique aspects of our application.
  • The robust add-on marketplace makes it easy to try out new approaches with minimal effort and investment -- and when we settle on a solution, we can easily scale it.
  • Heroku's support is quite good -- their staff is quite technical and willing to get into the weeds to diagnose even complicated problems.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Integration with development tools
  • Auto scale
  • Enhanced security
Read full review
Cons
Engine Yard
  • Embracing new Amazon Web Servicess(AWS) features
  • Security groups need more granularity
  • Audit trails of what happens by who in environment, especially when VM is deleted
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Large price jumps between certain resource tiers (2x Dyno for $50 per month versus Performance Dyno for $250). Free Postgres next jumps to $50 per month.
  • Marketing/Branding to non-technical stakeholders. As the years pass, I've had to fight more to convince stakeholders on the value of Heroku over AWS.
  • Improve Buildpack documentation. This is one area where Heroku's documentation is fairly confusing.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Pricing can certainly be improved as the cost adds up for dev/test environments using the Oracle Java Cloud platform.
  • It is hard to customize Oracle Java Cloud for complex Java applications requiring high bandwidth memory and network requirements.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Engine Yard
Ease of use
Read full review
Salesforce
Heroku is easy to use, services a ton of functions for you out of the box, and provides a means to get a software product off the ground and managed quickly and easily. The tools provide allows a small to medium size org to move very quickly. The CLI tools provided make managing an entire technical infrastructure simple.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
Engine Yard
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
Easy to use web based console and easy to use command line tools; deployment is done directly from a GIT repository. What more could you ask for? The one thing that keeps me from giving it a 10 is that custom build packs are almost incomprehensible. We used one for a while because we needed cairo graphics processing. Fortunately, I was able to figure out a different way to do what we needed so that we could get off the custom build pack.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Engine Yard
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
Heroku availability correlates pretty strongly to AWS US EAST availability. We had a couple of times where there was a Heroku-specific issue but not for the last 7-8 months.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Performance
Engine Yard
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
The only issue that I ever have is that about 1 out of 20 deployments (git push) will hang and need to be cancelled and done again.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Engine Yard
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
I've used it for many years without facing any major problem. It's not hard at all to get used to it, it's documentation is outstanding and simple. We are close to 2020 and I don't think most of the existing companies or startups should still face old problems such as wasting time deploying code and calculate computing resources.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Engine Yard
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
Be ready to pay a bit more than expected in the beginning if you're migrating from a big server. The application is probably not ready for the change and you have to keep improving it with time.
It's also important to consider that you can't save anything to the disc as it will be lost when your application restarts, so you have to think about using something like S3.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Engine Yard
More closely aligns to native AWS
Read full review
Salesforce
Heroku is the more expensive option for hosting compared to some of the cloud platforms we investigated, but it's worth it for us because of the plug-and-play nature of Heroku deployment. We can be up and running in a few minutes and know with precision how much it will cost us each month to run the application, unlike Amazon Web Services where you have to go to great pains to configure it correctly or else you might end up with a shocking monthly bill. Overall, spending the time to configure Amazon Web Services or one of its competitors is likely the more affordable and powerful choice, because you have control over so many specifics of the configuration. But it also requires the burden of continuing to maintain and update your AWS instance, whereas with Heroku they take care of security fixes and platform upgrades. It's a great service and we are happy to pay the extra cost for the value-adds Heroku provides.
Read full review
Oracle
We selected Oracle Java Cloud for its native integration with other Oracle solutions and its focus on Java applications. Overall, our experience with Oracle Java Cloud has been positive, as it has improved our efficiency, security, and scalability in developing cloud applications.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Engine Yard
  • Positive in the sense that we can deploy new applications quickly for MVP
Read full review
Salesforce
  • It has been critical in seamlessly operating our platform with runs all of our programs.
  • It has been impressive with its ability to scale quickly which results in the growth of our work.
  • It allows for tracking of different features which allows for quick problem solving which saves us time.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Positive impact on ROI by reducing the time to deploy Java applications in the cloud.
  • Positive impact on business objectives by reducing the CapEx needed to hire staff to deploy and then later maintain the Java instances.
Read full review
ScreenShots