Enovia vs Teamcenter

• Every revision of a part or document is a separate object, hence unlike SAP status control of an object is easy. The lifecycle of each object can be controlled by its own policy.
• It is easy to create new types of objects rather than pre-defined object types and control them by their own customized policy.
• Efficient Security and access control model for design and supporting documents file checkout and check-in and easy reporting mechanisms for tracking business activity, like how many parts being created/revised/obsoleted and who has checked out how many times etc.
• Generation of custom reports

Read full review

• Teamcenter tracks & creates revisions pretty well, but that is after much customization we've done to it.
• Quite a bit of search power, although very complicated and challenging to use the search features.
• A database that can be integrated with ERP systems, but that does require much code writing and an SOA system.
• Document security -- not sure if these features are out-of-the-box or customizations, but this capability is highly valuable to protect IP.

Read full review

• When a part/assembly has been released in Enovia and gone for production or downstream processing, Enovia doesn't have much control, hence, Enovia should come up with an easy controlling mechanism for various disposition of parts and seamless communication with an ERP or downstream process.
• If a document is linked to thousands of materials then revising this document takes long time gets floated to the BOMs where the previous document versions are used. So, Enovia should have an efficient way to replace the floating process or another efficient mechanism for document revision processing.

Read full review

• Within the NX CAD package, there are often various little bugs and glitches that we come across in daily use. We generally submit incident reports to Siemens on these.
• In general, the Teamcenter software package lacks ease of use, general users within the department require frequent intervention and help from higher users for seemingly simple tasks.

Read full review

• Easy learning curve for the users- Very user-friendly Interface for Engineering central make the users happy and easy to learn the BOM creation and Engineering change management process.
• Time-saving - Seamless Creation and revision process of objects saves a huge amount of time compared to other systems.
• Easy to copy existing business data and modify them as required.

Read full review

• Decreased time to process ECNs with electronic workflow and notifications
• Ability to track status of ECNs has given us a better overview of the health of our process and resource constraints
• Version control for released items going through revision has reduced risk of manufacturing the wrong revision

Read full review