Epsilon PeopleCloud (formerly the Agility platform with Agility Harmony) is an enterprise-level email marketing and cross-channel campaign management platform competing with Responsys, Cheetah Mail, ExactTarget, etc. The vendor has a strong international presence with staff in 14 countries.
N/A
SAP Replication Server
Score9 out of 10
N/A
SAP's Sybase Replication Server is database development and management software.
N/A
Pricing
Epsilon PeopleCloud
SAP Replication Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epsilon PeopleCloud
SAP Replication Server
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Epsilon PeopleCloud
SAP Replication Server
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Epsilon PeopleCloud and SAP Replication Server
Feature
Epsilon PeopleCloud
-
Ratings
SAP Replication Server
10.0
3 Ratings
18% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Epsilon PeopleCloud and SAP Replication Server
Feature
Epsilon PeopleCloud
-
Ratings
SAP Replication Server
10.0
3 Ratings
21% above category average
Simple transformations
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Complex transformations
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Epsilon PeopleCloud and SAP Replication Server
Feature
Epsilon PeopleCloud
-
Ratings
SAP Replication Server
7.6
3 Ratings
4% below category average
Data model creation
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Metadata management
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Business rules and workflow
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Collaboration
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Testing and debugging
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Epsilon PeopleCloud and SAP Replication Server
Appropriate for large organizations who want customization in their emails. The tool - while intuitive if you have previous background - is hefty and large in scope of capabilities. It's great for organizations who have multiple users and shows the name of person who last made changes. The reporting is really good - but may be a bit overwhelming for organizations who don't need a lot of detailed information
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I asked questions about a warm standby and multicast replication. We ended up using bi-directional replication and a warm standby db. Having 3 or more live OLTP DB's where each was read-write was going to be difficult to manage for contention if the same table was being updated. We stuck with an easier solution to have only two OLTP's, and then used additional DB's as read-only DW's.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The tool could be improved to "remember" where you last left off (specific user). Having to constantly retrace steps if you get logged out is annoying.
Hitting the "back" arrow sends you back to a main section, when it should send you back to where you previously were.
It would be nice to see performance reports available within the campaign itself, as well as within the reporting section.
Ability to NOT be able to change anything in a campaign after it has launched. This has happened multiple times. We usually copy a previous campaign to start a new one but often, we end up changing content on the version we are copying from -- this is very annoying and dangerous.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
SAP support has been outstanding. They have quick response times and always meet their SLAs. Any time we have an issue that needs to be researched they are able to get back to us quickly with resolution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
While both Epsilon Agility Harmony and Oracle Responsys are great for larger organizations that send a lot of emails, I think Epsilon Agility Harmony is more robust than Responsys and is easier to use. It is significantly more complex than HubSpot and requires previous knowledge of using an email tool that has content blocks and or dynamic content.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info