EtherApe vs. Progress Kendo UI
EtherApe vs. Progress Kendo UI
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EtherApe | N/A | EtherApe is a graphical network monitor for Unix modeled after etherman. Featuring link layer, IP and TCP modes, it displays network activity graphically. Hosts and links change in size with traffic. Color coded protocols display. It supports Ethernet, FDDI, Token Ring, ISDN, PPP, SLIP and WLAN devices, plus several encapsulation formats. It can filter traffic to be shown, and can read packets from a file as well as live from the network. | N/A | |
Progress Kendo UI | N/A | Kendo UI is a JavaScript UI toolkit that allows users to build responsive web-based apps integrated into their framework of choice (jQuery, Angular, React, or Vue). The vendor’s value proposition is that Kendo UI offers a large library of popular and configurable components ranging from sophisticated grids and charts to basic buttons, so users don’t have to waste development time building their UI. The vendor also says the large library of customizable themes means users can easily deploy a… | $999 per developer, royalty-free |
| EtherApe | Progress Kendo UI | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| EtherApe | Progress Kendo UI |
|---|
| EtherApe | Progress Kendo UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Syncfusion® Essential Studio® Score 6.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | PRTG Score 8.5 out of 10 | ![]() React Score 8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | PRTG Score 8.5 out of 10 | ![]() React Score 8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| EtherApe | Progress Kendo UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.2 (177 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 8.8 (21 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (38 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 7.5 (38 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.1 (9 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 8.2 (2 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 8.2 (2 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 8.2 (2 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
| EtherApe | Progress Kendo UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Pros | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Cons | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Usability | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Performance | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Support Rating | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Scalability | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Open Source No answers on this topic | Progress Software Corporation
|
| ScreenShots | Progress Kendo UI Screenshots |










