Exoscale vs. IBM Power Virtual Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Exoscale
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Exoscale is a Swiss / European cloud service provider with services covering the cloud infrastructure spectrum from virtual machines and S3 compatible object storage to a scalable kubernetes service and databases.N/A
IBM Power Virtual Server
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM presents their Power Systems Virtual Server as a scalable, cost-effective way to run IBM AIX, IBM i and Linux workloads​.N/A
Pricing
ExoscaleIBM Power Virtual Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ExoscaleIBM Power Virtual Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ExoscaleIBM Power Virtual Server
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
ExoscaleIBM Power Virtual Server
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Exoscale
-
Ratings
IBM Power Virtual Server
8.3
186 Ratings
2% above category average
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime00 Ratings8.7185 Ratings
Dynamic scaling00 Ratings8.2184 Ratings
Elastic load balancing00 Ratings8.2181 Ratings
Pre-configured templates00 Ratings7.8180 Ratings
Monitoring tools00 Ratings9.0183 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images00 Ratings8.5181 Ratings
Operating system support00 Ratings8.3183 Ratings
Security controls00 Ratings8.7182 Ratings
Automation00 Ratings7.7159 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ExoscaleIBM Power Virtual Server
Small Businesses
Akamai Cloud Computing
Akamai Cloud Computing
Score 9.0 out of 10
Akamai Cloud Computing
Akamai Cloud Computing
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.2 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.2 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ExoscaleIBM Power Virtual Server
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(186 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ExoscaleIBM Power Virtual Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
Due to its reliability, it is well-suited for mission-critical applications. It is also well suited for running multiple applications on a single server and fully utilizing the server's full capacity. However, it is not well suited for servers that require dedicated IO resources.
Read full review
Pros
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • It is easy to segregate test environment with production environment
  • security and compliance
  • IBM server are scalable with - with increase in data it can dynamically allocate the resources with saves the company cost
  • it is very convenient to use with help of its hardware management console and integrated virtualization manager.
  • The best part it , it support our legacy system.
Read full review
Cons
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Having a wider selection of software to work with would be welcome.
  • Training and education is daunting at first and could be simplified.
  • Much of the automation is wonderful after it is set up but getting started has a steep learning curve.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
At the moment we are 100% satisfied with the performance and our support team is well used to the process involved. So unless we have some major issues in adopting, we are sure to be with IBM itself.
Read full review
Usability
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
Power Systems Virtual Server on IBM Cloud for IBMi's overall usability is good, but it can be difficult for new users, some learning is needed, but there are tonns of online documentation.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
Very easy to use.
Read full review
Performance
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
Easy to use.
Read full review
Support Rating
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
As with most IBM products the ongoing support for IBM Power Virtual Server is solid and consistent. IBM provides a clear roadmap for receiving support of their products. Both voice and online response is offered. It is obvious that IBM has the internal systems and culture to maintain support functions. This starts from the initial support call to the problem analysis and continues through the problem resolution. Documentation and communication are consistent within this process.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
It is economic.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
They both have their own ups and downs and it totally depends on the team which suits them best. IBM Power Virtual Server has Performance, Scalability, Reliability and Availability, Compatibility, and Good Vendor Support. The specific use case and workload requirements played a significant role. Some workloads may benefit from IBM Power Systems' architecture, while others may perform equally well on alternative platforms.
Read full review
Scalability
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
It is efficient.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Exoscale
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • We have had a return on investment of 30%.
  • There have also been 80% fewer application crashes due to a lack of resources that previously ran on the X86 platform.
  • Administration management has been simplified and staff can dedicate themselves to the development of applications, instead of providing support to users when the applications do not respond efficiently, this made staff 45% more productive.
Read full review
ScreenShots