F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Lumen Next-Gen Voice

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
F5 Networks provides BIG-IP Access Policy Manager as an identity and access solution which can be deployed as a standalone solution or as an add-on to F5 Networks' flagship BIG-IP TLM or F5 Advanced WAF applications.N/A
Lumen Next-Gen Voice
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
Lumen Next-Gen Voice offers cloud calling and business voice solutions that use VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) to transmit calls over the internet. Lumen Next-Generation Voice Services provide Dedicated LD and/or Toll-Free Service using a SIP connection. These services leverage the company's network footprint in the U.S., EMEA and LATAM to provide more than a point solution for customers solving for operational and efficiency challenges. Calls supported: Enterprise Long…
$8
per month (12-month term required) per concurrent call path
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Lumen Next-Gen Voice
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Lumen Cloud Voice - Essentials
starting at $11.50
per month (minimum 60 mo term) per user (minimum 250 users)
Lumen Cloud Voice - Plus
starting at $17.50
per month (minimum 60 mo term) per user (minimum 250 users)
Lumen Cloud Voice - Premium
starting at $22.50
per month (minimum 60-month term) per user (minimum 250 users)
Lumen Cloud Voice - Specialty Lines
starting at $47.50
per month (minimum 60-month term) per user (minimum 250 users)
Lumen Voice Complete (SIP Trunking)
starting at $8
per month (12-month term required) per concurrent call path
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Lumen Next-Gen Voice
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsNext‑Generation 9‑1‑1 available as an add-on (custom pricing).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Lumen Next-Gen Voice
Features
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Lumen Next-Gen Voice
Virtual Private Network
Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of Product A and Product B
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
7.7
9 Ratings
13% below category average
Lumen Next-Gen Voice
-
Ratings
AES 256-bit Encryption8.96 Ratings00 Ratings
Kill Switch7.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Platform Support7.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Split Tunneling8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
IP Address Masking7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
No-Logs Policy5.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Server Locations6.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Wi-Fi Protection9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Simultaneous Connections8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Support Services7.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Lumen Next-Gen Voice
Small Businesses
Norton 360
Norton 360
Score 7.1 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Lumen Next-Gen Voice
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(20 ratings)
7.4
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)Lumen Next-Gen Voice
Likelihood to Recommend
F5
I think that the platform is well suited to many Remote Access VPN solutions, but I also think there is a lot of room for improvement on the backend. If you are hoping to deploy your APM solution across many different datacenters or colos, it may not be the best choice for the final solution.
Read full review
Lumen Technologies
CenturyLink SIP is an acceptable solution if you have an on-prem PBX (ShoreTel, Mitel, etc) that accepts SIP. I have found a better solution is to run two different carriers through SD-WAN (such as Bigleaf or Velocloud MSR) and use a provider like BCMOne (formerly NexVortex) to manage the SIP.
Read full review
Pros
F5
  • SAML 2.0 identity federation support.
  • Integrates with third-party SSO solutions.
  • Bridging modern authentication and authorization (SAML, OAuth/OIDC) and classic authentication and authorization methods.
  • Policy routing
Read full review
Lumen Technologies
  • Reliable service
  • Supports wide range of key features
  • They do have high levels of support where you can receive real answers
Read full review
Cons
F5
  • There's some more advanced configurations within OAuth that I think could be fleshed out and easier to approach.
  • There's a lot of things in F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager policies that I find myself recreating every policy. An easier way to copy objects from one to policy to another.
Read full review
Lumen Technologies
  • Lumen-Centurylink has suffered from many noticeable outages in the last few years - this is a blow to their reputation that they still have to recover from.
  • Lumen-CenturyLink does not peer well enough with OTHER carriers - they depend on their own network to give you SIP, which means less true redundancy.
  • Lumen-CenturyLink needs a better customer portal/interface to handle failover, see the real-time status, etc.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
F5
Integration with F5 BIG-IP systems that we plan to keep using for a while.
Read full review
Lumen Technologies
No answers on this topic
Usability
F5
If F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager usability is fine it's not hard to use if you read the documentation but it does feel dated and could use a responsive design update to modernize user interface to current standards.
Read full review
Lumen Technologies
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
F5
No answers on this topic
Lumen Technologies
SIP service support is definitely improving. A few years ago I would have rated them a 2. Now a 7. But, Lumen still needs a better portal experience to report and see a real-time status. Also to manage SIP failover functions in a WYSIWIG/GUI interface. When Lumen's network breaks in a larger outage, there are long hold times and support is not good.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
F5
It is open platform so support is not good and than F5 and features visibility as not good as F5. F5 Set up and easy to use to admin console. Also have more feature visibility for load balancing, web server accelerator, application server ddos protection and WAF. F5 more efficient to handle concurrent request.
Read full review
Lumen Technologies
CenturyLink [Enterprise Voice SIP] was the incumbent, so switching providers, particularly for our HQ was an overwhelming task for our small team. We did migrate from the legacy CenturyLink voice product EIPT to the new Voice Complete solution as well as upgrade our US and UK circuits along with a hardware upgrade of the managed PE routers in each location. We also decided to implement RingCentral in one of our very small international branches but the lack of features is problematic. We still have T1 service in our other international branches but are looking to go full cloud SaaS PBX there, likely through Microsoft Teams, which we already use for messaging. There are some complexities, as we can't port our numbers directly yet and need to set up an additional CUBE router for SIP. Eventually we hope to get to fully SaaS via Teams.
Read full review
Return on Investment
F5
  • Simplified our approach to company-wide VPN solutions greatly by allowing us to use a single product instead of multiple products like we had before
  • Can handle 15000-20000 users at once with no issues
  • Was able to configure to support users travelling with 4G connections on their laptops and accommodate constant changing IP addresses
Read full review
Lumen Technologies
  • Faster learning
  • Increased numbers of calls
  • Organization of calls
Read full review
ScreenShots