FileInvite vs. SAP CPQ
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FileInvite | Score1.1 out of 10 | N/A | FileInvite automates the process of collecting information and documents from your clients. The vendor says the process is simple, and the interface is secure. All you have to do is create and send a FileInvite with the information you require. The client then uploads the files to a secure portal where you can approve or decline the information that has been submitted. FileInvite also allows you to set up reminders, templates and sync with your cloud storage like Google… | N/A |
SAP CPQ | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | SAP CPQ (replacing the former CallidusCloud CPQ solution) has been built to be independent of any CRM. The vendor says that this makes their solution more flexible. The vendor also says their solution provides businesses the flexibility to customize and enhance the solution without the constraints of CRM code. Pricing and product catalog changes can also be made by the users without having to rely on a CRM administrator. | N/A |
| FileInvite | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FileInvite | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
40% Would buy again 2 Answers | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
60% Happy with the feature set 3 Answers | 88% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | |
| FileInvite | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FileInvite | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | Agentforce Revenue Management Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FileInvite | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 1.0 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.5 |
| Usability | 7.0 | 7.8 |
| Performance | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Ease of integration | 10.0 | - |
| FileInvite | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | FileInvite Screenshots | SAP CPQ Screenshots |













