Formerly from Blackbaud and based on the former MicroEdge FIMS product, FIMS is a software solution used to manage requests, approvals, and declinations for grantmaking and scholarships.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Score4.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.
Director of Grant Management at Houston Endowment (Philanthropy, 11-50 employees)
Chose FIMS
It is really a matter of priority. I can see situations where GIFTS Classic is a very strong option! Once an organization determines its priorities then it should definitely consider GIFTS to see how well it compares with mission critical functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Discontinued Products
No answer on this topic
Key User Insights
Would buy again
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Delivers good value for the price
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Happy with the feature set
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Lived up to sales and marketing promises
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Features
FIMS
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
8 Ratings
16% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
13 Ratings
8% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.912 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
14 Ratings
34% below category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
14 Ratings
9% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
15 Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
7.015 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
13 Ratings
9% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
13 Ratings
4% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
8.012 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
3.09 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
10 Ratings
14% above category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.97 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
8.97 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
7 Ratings
16% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
5 Ratings
21% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
4 Ratings
16% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
7 Ratings
20% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
6 Ratings
19% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
6 Ratings
22% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
9.95 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of FIMS and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
It is a very robust system and with the various modules you can accomplish much of what is needed for traditional transaction US-based grantmaking. If you have more complicated grantmaking, deal with foreign currencies or want to have tighter alignment of finance and budget numbers, GIFTS may not meet your needs. Additionally, some of their core projects have limited accessibility in terms of various mobile devices or access from outside the organization's network.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics AX's scalability to meet our regional office needs provide flexibility to the team's requirements.
Combined with Citrix Xenapp, the application offers seamless access for users on high latency unreliable network connection to the application.
Application maintenance and updates are easy which makes it possible for us to manage remotely considering the servers are located in a remote Asia site.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
While GIFTS Classic is the most barren interfaces of all MicroEdge products, there are some simple capabilities I wish GIFTS could still perform such as better email integration from outlook to a GIFTS request, more efficient requirement reminders, and a wider use of Microsoft Office and other external product integration (GuideStar).
It's disappointing that you have to purchase an additional "Customizer Module" or "Budget Module" in order to access basic functions of a GMS. This seems like a basic system function that MicroEdge takes advantage of, unfortunately.
The online application module (IGAM) is still quite antiquated and you have to be knowledgeable of basic HTML in order to really customize your organization's online application. More flexibility and design functions would be greatly appreciated with the online application function, especially since this is a public document and represents your organization.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
MRP can be slow to adapt to changes in actual production or supply chain transactions.
Setting up number sequences seems a trivial matter, but these numbers ID transactions once they are in the ledger and are key--easy to miss this point in the implementation process.
Bank rec being easily automated and able to quickly plug into a bank back end to get data is not the best.
Payment processing can be 'clunky' based on checks, ACH, Wires...as some of these items are not triggered out of the box in AX, bur are easily added --talking ACH and Wires specifically.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
I typically receive a response to an inquiry within an hour or two, if not sooner. Most tech support people are knowledgeable about our problems, and if not, they will escalate to the proper person.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
It is really a matter of priority. I can see situations where GIFTS Classic is a very strong option! Once an organization determines its priorities then it should definitely consider GIFTS to see how well it compares with mission critical functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I was not part of the decision making process to select Microsoft Dynamics AX, however, I do know that an exhaustive search was done and many options were considered alongside Microsoft Dynamics AX and I feel that the right decision was made in choosing this solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting was difficult on GIFTS - often we had to place data into Excel by hand since we could not create simple customized reports. This increased time spent on tasks GIFTS was supposed to streamline.
GIFTS did not alert us to duplicated organization records, so often it was difficult to reflect an organization's full grant history to our Board of Directors, leading to employees spending time searching through paper records to make sure all information was properly reported.
GIFTS created duplicate contact records, meaning it was difficult to find out which contact was related to which organization and cluttered our data. This caused decreased processing and response time to "new" contacts who turned out to be previous contacts or contacts whose information was tied to previous organizations. Even when contact information was updated for a new organization, sometimes the program would revert to the first organization contact information, several times leading to checks cashed to incorrect organizations---the very worst consequence of using GIFTS to our organization. Thankfully, the money was recovered upon the few times that error occurred, but it led to me and other employees reading through out 800+ checks before issue to make sure the correct organization was in fact being rewarded.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info