Formerly from Blackbaud and based on the former MicroEdge FIMS product, FIMS is a software solution used to manage requests, approvals, and declinations for grantmaking and scholarships.
N/A
Sage HRMS
Score9.8 out of 10
N/A
Sage HRMS is an HR management solution that integrates payroll, benefits, recruiting, employee self-service, and analytics capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
FIMS
Sage HRMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FIMS
Sage HRMS
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
FIMS
Sage HRMS
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
5.5
9 Ratings
39% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
1.39 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.99 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
1.27 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
4.8
7 Ratings
52% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
6.17 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
4.04 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
6.92 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
2.16 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
3.06 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
3.27 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
1.2
7 Ratings
149% below category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
1.26 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
1.27 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
1.06 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
3.9
8 Ratings
72% below category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
4.18 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
4.27 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
1.16 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
4.05 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.0
2 Ratings
14% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
3.7
8 Ratings
69% below category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
2.07 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
1.28 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.0
4 Ratings
14% below category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.3
2 Ratings
11% below category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.8
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
Feature
FIMS
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
8.5
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of FIMS and Sage HRMS
It is a very robust system and with the various modules you can accomplish much of what is needed for traditional transaction US-based grantmaking. If you have more complicated grantmaking, deal with foreign currencies or want to have tighter alignment of finance and budget numbers, GIFTS may not meet your needs. Additionally, some of their core projects have limited accessibility in terms of various mobile devices or access from outside the organization's network.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sage HRMS is a software that fits in all organizations whether small or large and this makes it the most suitable HR solution as it will help you manage your workforce even if it may appear small. The software has analytics and reporting tools that are applicable in performance management where you will use them in assessing the productivity of your employees and plan on how to improve further as a workforce. It further helps in employee on-boarding, payroll management, and talent management
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
While GIFTS Classic is the most barren interfaces of all MicroEdge products, there are some simple capabilities I wish GIFTS could still perform such as better email integration from outlook to a GIFTS request, more efficient requirement reminders, and a wider use of Microsoft Office and other external product integration (GuideStar).
It's disappointing that you have to purchase an additional "Customizer Module" or "Budget Module" in order to access basic functions of a GMS. This seems like a basic system function that MicroEdge takes advantage of, unfortunately.
The online application module (IGAM) is still quite antiquated and you have to be knowledgeable of basic HTML in order to really customize your organization's online application. More flexibility and design functions would be greatly appreciated with the online application function, especially since this is a public document and represents your organization.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I do not work with this software anymore, and I am not involved with the renewal of it. However, if I were, I would still suggest using it unless something better was introduced
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I typically receive a response to an inquiry within an hour or two, if not sooner. Most tech support people are knowledgeable about our problems, and if not, they will escalate to the proper person.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is really a matter of priority. I can see situations where GIFTS Classic is a very strong option! Once an organization determines its priorities then it should definitely consider GIFTS to see how well it compares with mission critical functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sage HRMS was very cost effective for a non-profit. It does all that we needed as a company and more. It also allows us to handle payroll ourselves instead of outsourcing [it].
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting was difficult on GIFTS - often we had to place data into Excel by hand since we could not create simple customized reports. This increased time spent on tasks GIFTS was supposed to streamline.
GIFTS did not alert us to duplicated organization records, so often it was difficult to reflect an organization's full grant history to our Board of Directors, leading to employees spending time searching through paper records to make sure all information was properly reported.
GIFTS created duplicate contact records, meaning it was difficult to find out which contact was related to which organization and cluttered our data. This caused decreased processing and response time to "new" contacts who turned out to be previous contacts or contacts whose information was tied to previous organizations. Even when contact information was updated for a new organization, sometimes the program would revert to the first organization contact information, several times leading to checks cashed to incorrect organizations---the very worst consequence of using GIFTS to our organization. Thankfully, the money was recovered upon the few times that error occurred, but it led to me and other employees reading through out 800+ checks before issue to make sure the correct organization was in fact being rewarded.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info