Director from Fiserv is offered by the vendor as a fully customizable suite of solutions that work separately and together to meet any specific ECM needs. No matter what type of document a business needs to use, from ID cards to legacy reports, these solutions can help scan, import, store, modify and distribute the documents electronically.
N/A
Projector PSA
Score1.1 out of 10
N/A
Projector's cloud-based Professional Services Automation (PSA) software helps project-based services organizations track time and expenses, invoice clients, schedule resources, and manage projects. Its three modules span a more comprehensive set of uses than typical project management software. The Accounting module helps the user track time and expenses and manage invoices and billing. Also it syncs with the company's accounting systems as a sub-ledger. The Resource Scheduling module matches…
$15
per user
Pricing
Fiserv Director
Projector PSA
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Team Edition
$15
per user
Professional Edition
$25
per user
Enterprise Edition
$30
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fiserv Director
Projector PSA
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Fiserv Director
Projector PSA
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Fiserv Director and Projector PSA
Feature
Fiserv Director
7.1
1 Ratings
13% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Records management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated workflows
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Fiserv Director and Projector PSA
Feature
Fiserv Director
-
Ratings
Projector PSA
7.4
11 Ratings
4% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
9.510 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
9.510 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.511 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
7.57 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
5.82 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
5.23 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
8.57 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
7.65 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
3.77 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
9.511 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
5.23 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.19 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Fiserv Director and Projector PSA
Great for financial institutions. Integrates well with the Fiserv Premier suite. Easily imports bank reports that are generated from the Fiserv Core banking system. Would like to see more dynamic of purging documents automatically. Would like to see more functionality that is native to the Fiserv Premier application rather than having to purchase additional modules to expand its functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We think Projector PSA is a great tool to track and manage people in a professional service environment like management consulting. This system is easy to set up, easy to understand and should easily suit the needs of smaller and medium sized firms. It may be less appropriate for firms that rely very heavily on project management through another system (like MS Project) or firms that rely very heavily on a sales pipeline tracking system. While still very much possible to use, you would (I believe) have to do some re-keying between systems
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Projector is a very well designed tool for project management. It has allowed us to eliminate a number of auxiliary tools for project timelines and WBS for the vast majority of our projects.
Time and expense entry is intuitive and quick for our staff.
Our forecasting and resource management capability has improved greatly with Projector and allows us to grow our team efficiently with minimal additional administrative burden.
Reporting is extremely robust. It does require some time to really get a handle on the full functionality of the reporting tool, but once you do, you can get almost any kind of report you want out of the system!
More refined configuration of when to purge documents (ex. would like to see the ability to more dynamically purge documents such as the ability to purge documents x number of years after a loan has been paid in full).
Include functionality that is native to the application without having to pay for additional modules (ex. ability to configure automatic importing of PDFs without using an index file requires a separate PDF Data Input Filter module).
Would like to see the ability to automatically populate the Institution number in Director Unity Client.
Would like to have seen Fiserv move off Internet Explorer faster than it has. Workflows will only appear as an option in Web Director if used in Internet Explorer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Release management process needs to be improved. Currently no facility is provided to test the impact of new releases in a sand-box. This introduces business risk if there are interfaces into Projector PSA as part of it's use in the business.
We have been using this tool for a year now and find our use of it continually evolves and broadens. We are also very excited about the overhaul that's under way and feel many of the improvements being put in place will help make us that much more effective and efficient. The Projector team is also very responsive and collaborative in terms of user feedback and improvement suggestions, which helps us know they will work hard to help us get what we need out of the tool.
We selected Director because it easily integrates with Fiserv Premier core banking system. We have been using Fiserv Director for over 12 years. We haven't evaluated alternatives since moving to Fiserv Director. We did use Metaviewer prior to Fiserv Director which didn't have nearly as much functionality as Director.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We did pursue Quick Arrow another tool that was similar. We found that be in inflexible in use. Projector allows a lot of flexibility in setup. Our organization has very specific business processes and we were able to set up Projector to work with those processes. Several other systems we tried were not as flexible in allowing set up to our needs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Even in the small time that I stayed to see Projector PSA reporting I saw ROI projections become more realistic. There was real data to analyze that proved we were spending way too much and charging way too less on some projects.
Although employees were not used at entering their hours, this single reporting improved operations management and validated employees concerns that more people were needed to manage workload
Project proposals were more realistic because they were driven by real data.
Decision making overall for the department became more efficient and effective
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info