FitNesse vs. LambdaTest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FitNesse
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
FitNesse is an open source fully integrated standalone wiki web server and acceptance testing framework.N/A
LambdaTest
Score 7.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
LambdaTest is a cloud-based platform that helps users run manual and automation tests of their website and mobile apps. Users can test their native mobile application (Android and iOS) and mobile websites on Real Devices on cloud or choose from emulators & simulators for a multitude of configurations.
$15
per month per user
Pricing
FitNesseLambdaTest
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Lifetime Free
$0
1 Concurrent session Per Month
Live
15/Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Real Device (Includes Live)
25/ Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web Automation
$79/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser Automation
$99/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Native App Automation
$125/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser on Real Device
$128/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
$159/per Month (Billed Annually)
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute On-Premise
CUSTOM PRICING
Parallel Test
Enterprise
CUSTOM PRICING
Parallel Test
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FitNesseLambdaTest
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFor Enterprises Customize plans. Please contact our Chat Support or drop us email at support@lambdatest.com
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FitNesseLambdaTest
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
FitNesseLambdaTest
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
Selenium
Selenium
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FitNesseLambdaTest
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(3 ratings)
8.4
(51 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
FitNesseLambdaTest
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
Useful and straightforward. Appian and other low-code BCM tools can be easily integrated. Writing a script for a test is similar to writing a script in English. So simple to use because it's a wrapper class for selenium. FitNesse is being implemented with the goal of doing it correctly the first time. As a result, migrations of both the client and the server are made easier.
Read full review
LambdaTest, Inc.
In my opinion, I believe LambdaTest is very good and well suited for Cross-browser testing, Mobile application testing and Automated testing. But yes, there is always scope of improvement. In my experience, LambdaTest does not currently offer robust security testing features, so when we need to conduct extensive security testing on our applications we need to use other specialized tools
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Easy to install.
  • Command language is easy to create custom scripts.
  • FitNesse tests are deterministic.
Read full review
LambdaTest, Inc.
  • Offers geolocation testing in automation which is amazing!
  • You can select browsers, timezone, country and run the capability to start testing instantly.
  • We could scale up with parallel testing on local environment without any maintenance cost.
  • Integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Gitlab which makes our test cycle easier
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Logging can help any debug or error issues.
  • A Java/Selenium developer is needed to maintain the FitNesse keyword library.
  • Content.txt and properties.txted need to be added to the test suite in older versions to make it visible in a test run.
Read full review
LambdaTest, Inc.
  • Sometimes the live apps gets slow so its better that this doesn't happen more often
  • Still room to add more device vendors like, Huawei now doesn't support play services so its better thay we also have some devices which are with Huawei services only
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
LambdaTest, Inc.
LambdaTest provides video recording and screenshots of all your tests in their test logs, which makes tracking easier. Test statuses, such as Lambda Error and VM allocation, allowed us to quickly troubleshoot any build that failed while executing. So overall, it's been great to use for our Tester and Developer team.
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
LambdaTest, Inc.
The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
LambdaTest, Inc.
Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
The FitNesse testing automation framework is very simple to operate. It is simple to connect with the Jenkins and Bamboo environments. It is dependable, and it is simple and quick to include new tests. The process of debugging and fixing test failures is straightforward. FitNesse, including its installation, may be utilized with a minimum of fuss and difficulty. Maintaining scripts and monitoring their output is designed to be a relatively straightforward process.
Read full review
LambdaTest, Inc.
LambdaTest stands out from its competitors due to its affordable pricing model, intuitive user interface, and comprehensive set of features. Its real-time testing feature allows users to test their websites on a range of devices and browsers in real-time, enabling quick issue identification and resolution. The automated testing feature allows users to run tests in parallel across multiple browsers and devices, resulting in faster test execution and improved test coverage.LambdaTest's visual testing feature is particularly noteworthy as it enables users to identify visual differences between their website on different browsers and devices. This feature helps users identify and fix issues related to design or layout. LambdaTest also offers debugging tools that allow users to quickly identify and fix issues within their code.Compared to its competitors, LambdaTest offers an affordable and comprehensive solution for cross-browser testing. While each tool has its own strengths and weaknesses, LambdaTest's robust feature set, user-friendly interface, and affordable pricing make it a popular choice among developers and testers.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • It does not necessitate any further setup or configuration.
  • FitNess is an easy-to-use manual QA tool with a comprehensive report that aids stakeholders in better understanding the tested applications.
  • Automated testing suites for a wide range of websites. In addition, it is quite beneficial for the ongoing maintenance of the test library.
Read full review
LambdaTest, Inc.
  • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
  • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
  • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
Read full review
ScreenShots

LambdaTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Automated ScreenshotScreenshot of mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of Automation Testing on LambdatestScreenshot of Integrate with your favorite toolsScreenshot of Real-Time TestingScreenshot of Responsive Testing