Flowdock is a collaboration tool built around a chat and team inbox interface. Flowdock is available via app or as a browser-based solution.
It was originally offered by Rally Software Development, which was acquired by CA Technologies, which was acquired by Broadcom in 2018.
N/A
Socialtext (discontinued)
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Social Text was a tool that focused on social learning and includes Twitter-like microblogging capabilities. The product competed with MindTouch,Confluence, Jive Team Collaboration and other collaboration platforms. It was acquired by PeopleFluent in 2012 and is no longer available as a separate product, though similar capabilities are supplied by the PeopleFluent platform.
$1
Starting Price Per Month
Pricing
Flowdock
Socialtext (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Socialtext
$1.00
Starting Price Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Flowdock
Socialtext (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Flowdock
Socialtext (discontinued)
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Flowdock and Socialtext (discontinued)
Feature
Flowdock
4.9
2 Ratings
45% below category average
Socialtext (discontinued)
7.6
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Task Management
6.72 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Gantt Charts
3.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Scheduling
4.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation
2.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.22 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Search
5.72 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Visual planning tools
6.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Flowdock and Socialtext (discontinued)
Feature
Flowdock
3.8
2 Ratings
71% below category average
Socialtext (discontinued)
7.2
1 Ratings
10% below category average
Chat
8.92 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Notifications
7.72 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Discussions
7.72 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Surveys
2.01 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
1.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Flowdock and Socialtext (discontinued)
Flowdock is well suited for small teams and to environments that doesn't need too much reliability. I think it has some management problems that can make your life difficult if you have to manage a big amount of users. If you want just a tool communication with basic features (without using any integration or robust features) it can be suitable for you. You should try Flowdock using its free version for a small team and compare with others similar products. Flowdock delivers team chat and collaboration features, but is not necessarily the best product. Maybe some usability problems that disturb me won't be so relevant to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We use Social Text as a platform to air our issues with different departments. We voice our concerns and suggestions so we can help find a solution to the problems we incur on a daily basis. We need to have social text as an app so we can communicate in real time not only during work hours.
One thing a little bit annoying is that a lot of links to others Flowdock sections (preferences, external services, etc) will open a new window/tab. Each click may take you to a new window and you can get lost easily.
There isn't a quick access list to members of your organization to start a private chat. I took a while to find how to do that. The interface and usability could be better.
There isn't an app for Windows Phone.
Sometimes you try to load some conversation and it doesn't show anything. It is not frequently but happens sometimes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Search needs a ton of improvements. It was very slow a year ago
Search result quality was also not that good
I know they have improved their UI recently but when i used it last year it did not really have any design elements which could be used to make the articles look more presentable. It was important for us as we used it for external communication as well.
I go with the flow because I'm a newer employee and Flowdock works as advertised. If it were my decision to choose a team communciator for the organization, I'd recommend we go with Slack for its robust features and ever-changing/evolving software integrations. Slack is the outright innovator in the space and will continue to hold that role for some time.
Private chat or channels are well implemented in both softwares and both are also very easy to setup.
Besides of some usability problemas I think Flowdock is still better than Slack in this user experience and design.
The second point is the price. Flowdock is half price of Slack ($3/month). If you are a student or a non-profit organization, you are able to get some special license.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I frankly like Confluence better than socialtext because of the speed and the quality of search. They also have better design elements which can help make the articles pleasant to the eyes.