FluidSurveys was a survey and form building option. SurveyMonkey discontinued the product, it reached end of life (EOL) December 2017.
N/A
Snov.io
Score7.5 out of 10
N/A
The Snov toolkit is used to improve lead generation, outreach, email deliverability and customer management. Snov.io includes over a dozen lead search options, unlimited email campaigns, unlimited follow-ups as well as customer care to support users' sales operations.
$39
per month per user
Pricing
FluidSurveys (Discontinued)
Snov.io
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$39
per month per user
LinkedIn Automation add-on
$69
per month per account
Pro S
$99
per month per user
Pro M
$189
per month per user
Pro L
$369
per month per user
Pro Ultra
$738
per month per user
Custom Ultra
Contact Sales
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FluidSurveys (Discontinued)
Snov.io
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Discount available for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Features
FluidSurveys (Discontinued)
Snov.io
Lead Management Integrations
Comparison of Lead Management Integrations features of FluidSurveys (Discontinued) and Snov.io
For surveys, and for centralized info-gathering, FluidSurveys provides an excellent solution. There are other programs out there which provide a wider range of solutions (i.e., they can be used for surveying AND comprehensive online engagement, rather than just a data-gathering type of consultation); however, for programming and implementing surveys, FluidSurveys has an effective variety of strengths and options that make it optimal for users who are focused specifically on surveys.
Snovio is perfect if you have a clear, Ideal Customer Profile mapped for your lead gen efforts. It helps you find specific decision-makers in companies buying what you're selling and enables you to enhance the process of nurturing a relationship with value. Snovio is less appropriate if you target consumers instead of businesses and/or if you use it for massive/untargeted /generic cold email campaigns that verge on the brink of spam
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
User-friendly. For the majority of the general and basic tools you can use with FluidSurveys to build surveys are simple to use and intuitive. When certain issues come up, the service is quick (chat room) and effective.
Anonymity: the software has the reputation of being safer in terms of safeguarding private information the respondents share by answering surveys (this is mainly due to the fact that the servers are in Canada). Thus, indirectly, they increase response rates.
Extensive possibilities: FluidSurveys offers a plethora of possibilities and options that really renders the experience interesting in terms of micro-managing each details of the surveys you are sending out there. When the invitation leaves by email, it is exactly how you want it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Note: I am responding to this question as a user of the system and not a representative of my organization.
On a personal level/as a user only, I would definitely continue to use FluidSurveys.On a personal level/as a user only, I would definitely continue to use FluidSurveys.
I think the average person can very quickly pick up on the basics of the system: they would have no problems programming and launching a basic survey. Organizations may benefit from having people of different backgrounds getting their hands dirty in the system: at a minimum, both web programmers and opinion research advisors should be solicited for input or help.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Although I do not have much experience with Survey Monkey, the only two reasons why I choose FluidSurveys is that clients demand it (privacy and anonymity) and because managing multiple surveys at a time is easier. As for ODK Collect, I think it is a valuable alternative to FluidSurveys if you have time to learn the coding (not very complicated). ODK is a little less user friendly and you cannot address small details as you can with FluidSurveys (e.g.: formatting).
I prefer Snov.io as it offers a more "one-stop shop" to cold email than other tools. Saying that, the landscape of these tools is changing with products like Instantly changing the game with their new charging system of not charging "per seat" for lead generation. Snov.io is adapting well to these changes and brining out their own new features to compete with others in the market
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info