Fluxx in San Francisco offers Grantmaker, this being their grant management platform for funders, providing clear data exploration tools and customizable dashboard, dynamic workflow with audit trail, and many collaboration and sharing tools.
N/A
Sage HRMS
Score9.8 out of 10
N/A
Sage HRMS is an HR management solution that integrates payroll, benefits, recruiting, employee self-service, and analytics capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
Fluxx Grantmaker
Sage HRMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fluxx Grantmaker
Sage HRMS
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Fluxx Grantmaker
Sage HRMS
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
5.5
9 Ratings
39% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
1.39 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.99 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
1.27 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
4.8
7 Ratings
52% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
6.17 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
4.04 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
6.92 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
2.16 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
3.06 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
3.27 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
1.2
7 Ratings
149% below category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
1.26 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
1.27 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
1.06 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
3.9
8 Ratings
72% below category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
4.18 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
4.27 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
1.16 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
4.05 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.0
2 Ratings
14% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
3.7
8 Ratings
69% below category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
2.07 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
1.28 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.0
4 Ratings
14% below category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.3
2 Ratings
11% below category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.8
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
8.5
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Fluxx Grantmaker and Sage HRMS
Fluxx is well-suited for use by both small and large non-profits. Fluxx provides an intuitive interface and accurately houses grant proposal application data. Fluxx may be less useful at organizations where multiple funding layers exist, such as at community foundations which house multiple philanthropic funds. Fluxx has been an excellent product over the 10 years I have worked with it
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sage HRMS is a software that fits in all organizations whether small or large and this makes it the most suitable HR solution as it will help you manage your workforce even if it may appear small. The software has analytics and reporting tools that are applicable in performance management where you will use them in assessing the productivity of your employees and plan on how to improve further as a workforce. It further helps in employee on-boarding, payroll management, and talent management
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I do not work with this software anymore, and I am not involved with the renewal of it. However, if I were, I would still suggest using it unless something better was introduced
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have an assigned rep who is very responsive and is able to answer any questions. Other than that, the technical support has been terrible. I often don't waste time documenting bugs because I know they likely won't get fixed or even followed-up on. Instead, I search for workarounds.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Not included above because it is not in the system is Salesforce Foundation Connect. Again, I am always hesitant with this type of question. We selected grant maker because it offered the best fit for our organization's working style and culture. There is also a personal level of service that Fluxx offers that differed from other vendors (Smart Simple is similar in this way too). At the time we made the selection, one of the main influencers was the number of large foundations adopting the platform. As they invested in features, those features rolled out to the rest of the clients. This offered us access to functionality we would not have been able to afford otherwise. We moved from another vendor whose platform allowed for customization as well, but if they built it for one client, you still had to pay for it and pay ongoing yearly fees. So, the SAAS model adopted by Fluxx appealed to us. This has paid dividends as features have been developed. For example, one large foundation added the capability to track program-related investments alongside normal grantmaking activities within Fluxx. This is not functionality we could have paid to develop, but we have program-related investments that we wanted to track alongside grants and that feature was available to us because the development was paid for by that funder. That said, most of the above vendors have compelling products (as well as others), so be sure you look at your options and talk to users (other than the ones they provide you in the reference list) and check the Idealware guides
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sage HRMS was very cost effective for a non-profit. It does all that we needed as a company and more. It also allows us to handle payroll ourselves instead of outsourcing [it].
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info