Foglight vs. Google Cloud Run

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Foglight
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Foglight is a database performance management suite from Quest, with modules to perform cloud analytics, network performance monitoring and virtualization management, scaling to a broad, cloud / virtualization focused IT infrastructure monitoring solution.N/A
Google Cloud Run
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Run enables users to build and deploy scalable containerized apps written in any language (including Go, Python, Java, Node.js, .NET, and Ruby) on a fully managed platform. Cloud Run can be paired with other container ecosystem tools, including Google's Cloud Build, Cloud Code, Artifact Registry, and Docker. And it features out-of-the-box integration with Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging, Cloud Trace, and Error Reporting to ensure the health of an application.N/A
Pricing
FoglightGoogle Cloud Run
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FoglightGoogle Cloud Run
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FoglightGoogle Cloud Run
Features
FoglightGoogle Cloud Run
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Foglight
-
Ratings
Google Cloud Run
7.4
15 Ratings
8% below category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.415 Ratings
Container Orchestration00 Ratings8.114 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings2.71 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.215 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings7.511 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings8.514 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings8.712 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings8.215 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FoglightGoogle Cloud Run
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Score 8.9 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Score 8.9 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FoglightGoogle Cloud Run
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(5 ratings)
8.6
(15 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(2 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
FoglightGoogle Cloud Run
Likelihood to Recommend
Quest Software
Strengths [Foglight]
  • Monitoring, Alerting and Management of on-prem virtualization and physical servers
  • Historical trending and baselining are excellent and being able to compare a problem period against the same sets of data for a period when there was no issue is especially helpful as part of troubleshooting.
  • Ease of use for end users is appreciated
Weaknesses [of Foglight]
  • Creation and management of custom monitors is a developer level activity requiring Groovy skillset
  • Less useful for management of an environment where there is a large amount of custom implementations
  • Commitment to longevity of cartridges/packs for specific subsystems
  • Ability to create custom schedules/alerts/escalations is only available via a 3rd party product (from a former Quest developer) and is not particularly easy to manage/manipulate
  • Lack of API accessibility for external integrations to other analytics (splunk, etc.)
Read full review
Google
Microservices and RestFul API application as it is fast and reliant. Seamless integration with event triggers such as pubsub or event arc, so you can easily integrate that with usecases with file uploads, database changes, etc. Basically great with short-lived tasks, if however, you have long-running processses, Cloud Run might not be idle for this. For example if you have a long running data processing task, other solutions such as kubeflow pipelines or dataflow are more suited for this kind of tasks. Cloud Run is also stateless, so if you need memory, you will have to connect an external database.
Read full review
Pros
Quest Software
  • Database monitoring
  • Database management suite
  • Customization (both monitors and dashboards)
Read full review
Google
  • Auto scaling is the best one
  • provide direct VPC connectivity and rigid network
  • Cloud SQL and Pub/Sub services
  • Handling latency issues
Read full review
Cons
Quest Software
  • There are not many problems with this product
  • Limited ability to use Foglight itself to solve problems it identifies
Read full review
Google
  • The UI can be made simpler. Currently the UI is bloated and it takes time to find out what you want
  • More integrations with container registry providers (ECR, dockerhub)
  • Better permissions UX. Currently GCP requires service accounts to be used with cloud products, the experience adding/removing permissions is difficult to navigate
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Google
We definitely need to renew it because we dont own our own infrastructure and storage and we are happy with Cloud Run features
Read full review
Usability
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Google
The UI/console is great... the documentation is top-notch for developers, but the CLI itself when you have to script around it is very complex and easy to forget some options... the downside of a generic command line client.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Google
Not seen any major issues when we run applications its good
Read full review
Performance
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Google
Initially we felt slow but slowly it picked up and easy to manage
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Google
I was involved in the initial implementation setup, Its easy with the given documentaiton we can do ourself. Not that critical
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Quest Software
Read full review
Google
AWS Lambda supports code zip package, enabling lower cold start time. Also, AWS Lambda pricing is much simpler, easier to understand.
Other than that, the 2 products are very similar, including the Docker image support: the image must be built based on proprietary base image.
Obviously, if your other services are running in GCP, then Google Cloud Run is your only choice for tight integration, & private networking.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Google
Not part of purchase.
Read full review
Scalability
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Google
It has good auto scale feature and reliable also
Read full review
Professional Services
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Google
We have very good support when needed
Read full review
Return on Investment
Quest Software
  • Foglight has a positive impact on my company by being a complete monitoring platform that specializes in risk assessment, user diagnosis and management, and server monitoring ensuring a secure business infrastructure through predictive analytics, query analysis, anomaly detection, behavior tracking, troubleshooting, automated discovery, and more.
Read full review
Google
  • Built in support for auto scaling helps reduce operational overhead
  • Any application performance issues can be addressed quickly by allocating more resources while a proper fix can be planned and rolled out later
  • Using Google Cloud Run enables development of microservices which provides granular control for scaling critical services in the platform
Read full review
ScreenShots