TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Forcepoint DLP

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AForcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console.N/A

    Juniper MX Series

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AJuniper Networks describes their MX series as a robust portfolio of SDN-enabled routing platforms that provide system capacity, density, security, and performance with longevity. MX Series routers support digital transformation for service providers, cloud operators, and enterprises.N/A
    Pricing
    Forcepoint DLPJuniper MX Series
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Forcepoint DLPJuniper MX Series
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Forcepoint DLPJuniper MX Series
    Considered Both Products
    Forcepoint
    No answer on this topic
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    87%
    Would buy again
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    87%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    21 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    85%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Forcepoint DLPJuniper MX Series
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Juniper MX Series
    Feature
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    6.3
    2 Ratings
    26% below category average
    Juniper MX Series
    -
    Ratings
    Data Encryption6.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Forcepoint DLPJuniper MX Series
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Cisco Routers
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Cisco Routers
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Forcepoint DLPJuniper MX Series
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.7
    (35 ratings)
    7.5
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.6
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (3 ratings)
    7.9
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.3
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Forcepoint DLPJuniper MX Series
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Forcepoint
    -Where companies need to secure their attachment, which goes outside, means from their company to outside -Where companies need to ensure their client's personal information -Where companies need DLP. They need to look for Forcepoint only, as they have the upper hand over the rest of their competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    I think the Juniper MX series is a fantastic option for data center connectivity and places that aren't very high touch, but need good reliability and uptime. These switches are a bit more difficult to use day to day, but their reliability and robustness make them a great fit for data centers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Forcepoint
    • It has predominantly protected us from unauthorized parties and has provided us with better visibility and control over our data.
    • This software has also successfully prevented us from both malicious and accidental tasks, which are quite flexible actions when it comes to the violation of data loss prevention policies.
    • This product has been successful in improving compliance and even mitigating compliance violations, which further facilitated IT security.
    • I think there is room for improvement, as the user interface is slightly rough and difficult to adopt in the beginning. The software also hangs up at a few instances, which leads to some wasting of time and annoyance, but other than that, this software is good. The technical staff should work on the complexities for a better user experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • It's a robust platform, very resilient. It handles large traffic flows well.
    • It's a flexible architecture, it can be configured with provider or enterprise options (or both!)
    • It has an excellent versioning system, simple commit/confirm/rollback procedures!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Forcepoint
    • Forcepoint technical support--specially for users who go with essential support--is challenging to get support on time. You need the ticket to be raised long beforehand to get support from TAC. However, in the case of enterprise support, its is not like this technical person will come on a priority basis.
    • However it comes with higher prices, especially for SMB, it is allowed to pay that amount for support only.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Storm Control needs to have a way to see what going on in the CLI in a more straight forward fashion
    • They need a GUI interface much like the old Nortel Network equipment.
    • Not the routers fault but support costs have increased.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Forcepoint
    We have been fairly happy with the product and how it has worked. We have looked at other vendors for url filter and such and have not found one that meets our needs or does what we have been doing with Websense. The product has been fairly stable and we have only had a few issues in the past. We have all seen that it was one of the highest leaders from the Gartner Group Magic Quadrant for Web Gateways.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Forcepoint
    For us, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention was difficult to administer, did not work well when it did work, was incredibly expensive for the feature set you get, and was difficult to uninstall when we moved on from the software. Once it was fully set up, it worked occasionally for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    after deployment i rarely get fault tickets only work for hardware upgrades.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Forcepoint
    Support from Forcepoint has been lacking. When calling in with a high priority issue we rarely are able to work with a technician immediately. The queue waits are very long and when you get through there are no support engineers available and we need to wait for a call back for hours it seems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Forcepoint
    User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and start utilizing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We preferred Juniper over Cisco for our WAN/Internet routing needs for a number of reasons. First was the price, the Juniper offering was much more competitive than Cisco's. Secondly, was feature set, Juniper's implementation of routing protocols, routing tables, and forwarding options are better thought-out than Cisco's (not to mention Juniper's longstanding use of commit/confirm/rollback features, which Cisco has only started to use recently, and only on some of their products).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Forcepoint
    • The exchange of financial documents with customers creates extreme risk as data loss could result in financial and reputation damage to the customer. The cost of deploying Forcepoint is fractions of pennies compared to the potential financial impact of data loss.
    • There is some administrative overhead associated as false positives are inevitable, requiring a manual review and a potential loss of productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • We were able to run Juniper MX switches for much longer without updates than Cisco switches.
    • Less vulnerabilities mean more uptime and less upgrading, which is great for data center use cases.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots