Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs. Runecast

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console.N/A
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Prisma Cloud, from Palo Alto Networks (based on technology acquired with Evident.io and RedLock) is presented as a comprehensive Cloud Native Security Platform (CNSP) that delivers full lifecycle security and full stack protection for multi- and hybrid-cloud environments.N/A
Runecast
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Runecast Solutions Ltd. provides the AI-powered Runecast platform for proactive risk-based vulnerability management, security compliance, best practices alignment, configuration management, upgrade planning, operational efficiency and overall mission-critical security and stability. Customers benefiting from Runecast include enterprises like Avast, de Volksbank, DocuSign, Erste Bank, the German Aerospace Center (DLR), NYC Health & Hospitals, Oman Airports, Scania and the University of St…N/A
Pricing
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionPalo Alto Networks Prisma CloudRunecast
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Forcepoint DLPPalo Alto Networks Prisma CloudRunecast
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionPalo Alto Networks Prisma CloudRunecast
Features
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionPalo Alto Networks Prisma CloudRunecast
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
5.3
2 Ratings
38% below category average
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
-
Ratings
Runecast
-
Ratings
Data Encryption5.32 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionPalo Alto Networks Prisma CloudRunecast
Small Businesses
Paubox Email Suite
Paubox Email Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Armor
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionPalo Alto Networks Prisma CloudRunecast
Likelihood to Recommend
6.5
(35 ratings)
9.6
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.6
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.5
(3 ratings)
9.6
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.3
(12 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Forcepoint Data Loss PreventionPalo Alto Networks Prisma CloudRunecast
Likelihood to Recommend
Forcepoint
-Where companies need to secure their attachment, which goes outside, means from their company to outside -Where companies need to ensure their client's personal information -Where companies need DLP. They need to look for Forcepoint only, as they have the upper hand over the rest of their competitors.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Finding specific Cloud Vendor specific Cloud resource configuration, tags, network information and etc. is fairly easy to do. Cloud alert capabilities are pretty good and with proper knowledge top notch alerts can be created. Only downside I can think of is ease of use.
Read full review
Runecast Solutions Ltd.
No answers on this topic
Pros
Forcepoint
  • It has predominantly protected us from unauthorized parties and has provided us with better visibility and control over our data.
  • This software has also successfully prevented us from both malicious and accidental tasks, which are quite flexible actions when it comes to the violation of data loss prevention policies.
  • This product has been successful in improving compliance and even mitigating compliance violations, which further facilitated IT security.
  • I think there is room for improvement, as the user interface is slightly rough and difficult to adopt in the beginning. The software also hangs up at a few instances, which leads to some wasting of time and annoyance, but other than that, this software is good. The technical staff should work on the complexities for a better user experience.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Vulnerability assessment using Twistlock
  • Enhancing Security by scanning workload based on different Security standards and provide a compliance report
  • CF template integration with CI/CD pipeline to identify any security issue before workload are deployed
  • IAM/UEBA features additional to enchaining security posture
  • Auto remediation
  • Integration is simple and solution is supported on multiple cloud
  • Customized dashboard/queries
Read full review
Runecast Solutions Ltd.
No answers on this topic
Cons
Forcepoint
  • Forcepoint technical support--specially for users who go with essential support--is challenging to get support on time. You need the ticket to be raised long beforehand to get support from TAC. However, in the case of enterprise support, its is not like this technical person will come on a priority basis.
  • However it comes with higher prices, especially for SMB, it is allowed to pay that amount for support only.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Real-time supports would be much appreciated. At the moment they have a third-party ticketing support tool, which can be replaced with real-time support, which can be provided to the user at the time of the issue.
  • The user should be provided with all the learning material by the Palo Alto team at the time of license purchase. This would save a lot of users' time, which is taken up by research and finding the correct documents from the website.
  • Themes can be introduced in the feature set, which would help the user customize the software as per their needs.
Read full review
Runecast Solutions Ltd.
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Forcepoint
We have been fairly happy with the product and how it has worked. We have looked at other vendors for url filter and such and have not found one that meets our needs or does what we have been doing with Websense. The product has been fairly stable and we have only had a few issues in the past. We have all seen that it was one of the highest leaders from the Gartner Group Magic Quadrant for Web Gateways.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Runecast Solutions Ltd.
No answers on this topic
Usability
Forcepoint
For us, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention was difficult to administer, did not work well when it did work, was incredibly expensive for the feature set you get, and was difficult to uninstall when we moved on from the software. Once it was fully set up, it worked occasionally for us.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
It is no doubts about their functionalities and top-notch security features. The Products do really well in their every feature and gives you complete visibility to your valuable Data at all. The Support for the Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud is also one of the plus point where you gain the confidence into the product.
Read full review
Runecast Solutions Ltd.
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Forcepoint
Support from Forcepoint has been lacking. When calling in with a high priority issue we rarely are able to work with a technician immediately. The queue waits are very long and when you get through there are no support engineers available and we need to wait for a call back for hours it seems.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Runecast Solutions Ltd.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Forcepoint
User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and start utilizing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention solution.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Prisma Cloud stacks well with other similar Palo Alto products. UI is beautiful, has decent documentation and some trainings as in other platforms.
Read full review
Runecast Solutions Ltd.
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Forcepoint
  • The exchange of financial documents with customers creates extreme risk as data loss could result in financial and reputation damage to the customer. The cost of deploying Forcepoint is fractions of pennies compared to the potential financial impact of data loss.
  • There is some administrative overhead associated as false positives are inevitable, requiring a manual review and a potential loss of productivity.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Help reduce the cost by assisting what resources can be removed according to usage.
  • Report the vulnerabilities.
  • Time saved in investigating the issue.
Read full review
Runecast Solutions Ltd.
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Runecast Screenshots

Screenshot of Runecast UI System DashboardScreenshot of Runecast UI Kubernetes Issues viewScreenshot of Runecast UI Configuration Drift widgetScreenshot of Runecast UI Knowledge Profiles