6 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8 out of 100
Top Rated
10 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.1 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Zip Intake-to-Procure is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

7.4

Fourth Procurement and Inventory

74%
4 Ratings
9.1

Zip Intake-to-Procure

91%
10 Ratings

Support Rating

7.5

Fourth Procurement and Inventory

75%
8 Ratings

Zip Intake-to-Procure

N/A
0 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

HotSchedules and Fourth

The product is user-friendly in automating the tasks, managing the master data through central purchasing, and creating custom reports. It lacks certain basic functionalities like a record of wastages, sending automated emails confirming if the automatic tasks (scheduled tasks) have been completed or not, and the ability to automate the nutrition information, etc.
Read full review

Zip

Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility.
Read full review

Pros

HotSchedules and Fourth

  • The 'stock management' tab on the home screen is of particular use when keeping tabs on incoming deliveries into the restaurant.
  • The option to open and close your stock period is great as you have the chance to edit your stock at a moment's notice.
Read full review

Zip

  • Clear visibility into the PR workflow for all requesters and approvers
  • Ability to modify/tweak workflows based on particular requests or as our organization evolves without needing technical support from Zip Intake-to-Procure
  • Easy integrations into other tools already used by the organization including NetSuite, Slack, Asana and DocuSign
  • Vendor level records for tracking privacy and security data as well as vendor contacts
Read full review

Cons

HotSchedules and Fourth

  • It would help massively to see via Enterprise and menu items what ones are no longer active, to keep the data tidy.
  • When you take purchase reports from Enterprise and select to organise them by category, show the name of the category on the actual report download.
  • Quick and easy upload/download of supplier products for correcting prices, descriptions, prices in bulk.
Read full review

Zip

  • Zip [Intake-to-Procure] could use better commenting capabilities, more flexibility in its dashboard, and could integrate more broadly into our GRC systems.
Read full review

Pricing Details

Fourth Procurement and Inventory

Starting Price

Editions & Modules

Fourth Procurement and Inventory editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Zip Intake-to-Procure

    Starting Price

    $0

    Editions & Modules

    Zip Intake-to-Procure editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Support Rating

      HotSchedules and Fourth

      Too long to get an answer.
      Read full review

      Zip

      No answers on this topic

      Alternatives Considered

      HotSchedules and Fourth

      No answers on this topic

      Zip

      Truth be told, we haven’t seen any other similar products. The alternative was manually tracking in Google Sheets, ticketing systems, and in NetSuite. Coupa was probably the closest in terms of what we were looking for but they were not willing to fit it to our needs like Zip was able to.
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      HotSchedules and Fourth

      • Procurement: Integrating some of the key suppliers with Trade Simple has saved labour hours.
      • Integration: GL Integrations have increased the efficiency and quality of data.
      Read full review

      Zip

      • Visibility in to the overall procurement process
      • Business speed for approvals and information sharing with adjacent stakeholders and their preferred systems
      • Business speed and happy requesters
      Read full review

      Screenshots

      Add comparison