Fuel50 vs. Phenom Talent Experience Management (TXM) Platform

I would recommend Phenom to large enterprise needs as opposed to smaller companies. It can be a bit complex and provide too much customisation, which sounds like a great match for large organisations, but can be counterproductive for smaller ones. It's a great tool for those companies looking to take their talent function further, get them to the next level, as it provides a range of opportunities to further EB, talent community, etc. If a company is looking for a tool for storing candidates to perform basic tasks, this tool is too sophisticated

Incentivized

• Easy creation and use of talent pools
• Integrate sourcing tools
• Personalised messages to candidates

Incentivized

• Reports turnaround times could be improved
• Can't change candidates statuses in bulk
• Slow customer service turnaround at times

Incentivized

When comparing Phenom Talent Experience Management to Avature CRM: Avature aims very high, and sometimes gets lost in its own grandness. Phenom Talent Experience Management tends to be more user-friendly and accessible, with some more down to Earth features and functionalities. On the other hand, Avature allows for managing candidates in bulk, which is not an option for Phenom Talent Experience Management. When comparing Phenom Talent Experience Management to SmartRecruiters: the choice for Phenom Talent Experience Management was made once the decision had been made on investing on EB campaigns and building a talent community, as Phenom Talent Experience Management's capabilities are much better and broader.

Incentivized

• Increased candidate engagement
• Broad customisation is leading to more sophisticated campaigns which should increase ROI
• Reports could benefit from some TLC, data integrity has been a concern

Incentivized