TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GitHub

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AGitHub is a platform that hosts public and private code and provides software development and collaboration tools. Features include version control, issue tracking, code review, team management, syntax highlighting, etc. Personal plans ($0-50), Organizational plans ($0-200), and Enterprise plans are available.

    $4

    per month per user

    SonarQube

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/ASonarQube is an automated code review solution, serving as the verification layer for code quality and SDLC security. SonarQube is used to ensure that code is secure, reliable, and maintainable. It is available through SaaS or self-managed deployment.

    $34

    per month Recommended for teams <50 developers

    Veracode

    Score8.5 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine.N/A
    Pricing
    GitHubSonarQubeVeracode
    Editions & Modules
    Team
    $40
    per year per user
    Enterprise
    $210
    per year per user
    SonarQube Community Build
    $0
    (open source)
    Self-managed: Developer
    Starting at $720 annually
    per year per installation
    Self-managed: Enterprise
    Contact sales for pricing
    per year per installation
    Cloud-based: Enterprise
    Contact sales for pricing
    per year per installation
    Cloud-based: Teams
    Starting at $34 per month
    per month per installation
    Self-managed: Data Center
    Contact sales for pricing
    per year per installation
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GitHubSonarQubeVeracode
    Free Trial
    YesYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——Developer pricing options available
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GitHubSonarQubeVeracode
    Considered Multiple Products
    GitHub
    No answer on this topic
    SonarSource Sarl
    Chose SonarQube
    SonarQube is more focused on code quality, whereas Veracode does a better job of finding security vulnerabilities. We lean towards SonarQube because we are looking for quality.
    Incentivized
    Chose SonarQube
    SonarQube deployment worked well with our pipeline and had the right integrations with our IDE as well as it worked well with analyzing .NET frameworks when compared to GitHub and GitLab which has some of the functionality and can do some checks, but SonarQube made more sense …
    Incentivized
    Chose SonarQube
    I have used GitHub more that fortify so I am more familiar with GitHub for checking for vulnerabilities. I have noticed GitHub is good for checking different packages within your project but as far as checking code Quality and coverage Sonar is the better one in my opinion. …
    Incentivized
    Chose SonarQube
    Sonar Qube doesn't do as good of a job of finding security vulnerabilities as dedicated SAST software, but it does more for code quality that the developers want to see. A comparison of Sonar Qube to something like Veracode or Fortify isn't apples to apples since they're not …
    Incentivized
    Chose SonarQube
    No alternatives as SonarQube is best fitted in our Use Cases
    Incentivized
    Chose SonarQube
    I personally evaluated klocwork in a previous company and it worked well for Static Code Analysis for C++ applications but the Java support was not as good as SonarQube.

    Also the overall tooling and integrations provided by SonarQube is stellar and very other competitors can …
    Incentivized
    Chose SonarQube
    Setting up with Azure devops is easier.
    Scans results and depth of tweaking/whitelisting code snippets is easier with SonarQube.
    Incentivized
    Veracode
    Chose Veracode
    Sonar cube was quicker, but not as thorough. Both integrated into our CI/CD pipeline, however the integration for Veracode is more straight forward.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    SonarQube doesn't have the required code scanning vulnerability detecting service.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    I have used SonarQube for code quality and security analysis in the past, but Veracode's Software Composition Analysis analysis makes a big difference in terms of identifying vulnerabilities in dependencies. It would make it a lot easier if the IDE plugin could show the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    SonarQube is better at identifying code smells (code quality) but Veracode is better at identifying vulnerabilities when it comes to csharp.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Earlier in our organisation, Fortify was used (formerly from HP but now owned by Micro Focus). The general consensus was that there was too much noise (false positives), taking a lot of time to find and then fix the real issues.

    SonarQube is also used in our organisation but not …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    SonarQube or Sonar Cloud focuses on scanning for coding good practice and code security is not covered as extensively as Veracode. SonarQube is free but required installation on an on-prem server. Subscription to Sonar Cloud (Saas version of Sonar Qube) is cheaper but does not …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Have also evaluated services by GitHub and Snyk. I will say that we continue to use Veracode because of its brand recognition and vendor status in the financial services industry. However if my current company was not operating in this industry I would be tempted to use the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    SonarQube is faster and can be free, but the security scanning capabilities are a joke compared to Veracode.
    Unlike SonarQube, Veracode goes deeper into finding a very wide variety of vulnerabilities and best practices that should be applied to software and provides reporting …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    SonarQube is a great general code quality analyzer, and we do use it as a companion to Veracode. However, it's not security-focused and tends to have a higher false-positive rate for security issues it flags. It's also not as easy to generate reports from the findings unless …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode takes compiled code, so integration, regression based test cases can be evaluated well. Now, it has lot of features ranging from API sec to DAST, so have a code which is well working in live env is very essential to setup and hence giving us an edge over other tools. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Mainly for reporting: Veracode reports are really comprehensive
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Why you selected Veracode?
    Stack coverage.
    Integration into our pipeline and ticketing tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode is much better at uncovering security weaknesses and providing information and consulting. I use Veracode because our company decided for.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    The maturity of the Veracode and the continuous improvements in its products it's one of the principal characteristics of chosee it, Veracode it's a SaaS platform and was born in the cloud, so this is a great option for our clients to be quick to implement also the easy of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    More comprehensive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    My organization use veracode.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Once we learn how to use Veracode, its simple and very efficient tool to include in any of your devops environments like Dev, QA, Staging , UAT etc. The configuration is much simpler compared to others. The Enterprise license cost is also competitive compared to others. The …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    It is company's higher authorities' decision to use Veracode over other products
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode has a very good integration within its products, which makes it easy for a developer. Veracode helps in providing support both actively and through resources on their platform to remediate and fix the issues found in one's application. The reporting section being …
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode has been longer on the market and has build the good reputation. We appreciate that they constantly improving the quality of their software and adding new features.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode stands out for trusted community results, vendor relationship, and partner channels to support and provide a close relationship.
    Integration capacity is a good point when deciding to integrate with DevOps framework.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode has a better security analysis and detection.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode speaks on very practical, actual security issues rather than thousands of code quality issues.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    47 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    32 Answers
    92%
    Would buy again
    128 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    46 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    29 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    90 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    48 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    32 Answers
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    132 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    38 Answers
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    76 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    42 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    27 Answers
    86%
    Implementation went as expected
    101 Answers
    Features
    GitHubSonarQubeVeracode
    Version Control Software Features
    Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of GitHub and SonarQube and Veracode
    Feature
    GitHub
    9.4
    10 Ratings
    7% above category average
    SonarQube
    -
    Ratings
    Veracode
    -
    Ratings
    Branching and Merging9.710 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Version History9.710 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Version Control Collaboration Tools9.89 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pull Requests9.710 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code Review Tools8.89 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Access Control9.210 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Testing Integration8.810 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue Tracking Integration8.910 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Branch Protection9.89 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    GitHubSonarQubeVeracode
    Small Businesses
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Rencore Code (SPCAF)
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Checkmarx
    Score7.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GitHubSonarQubeVeracode
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.9
    (131 ratings)
    8.9
    (35 ratings)
    8.3
    (144 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.3
    (9 ratings)
    Usability
    9.4
    (10 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    5.5
    (29 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    2.7
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.8
    (26 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.6
    (67 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (4 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.5
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GitHubSonarQubeVeracode
    Likelihood to Recommend
    GitHub
    GitHub is an easy to go tool when it comes to Version Controlling, CI/CD workflows, Integration with third party softwares. It's effective for any level of CI/CD implementation you would like to. Also the the cost of product is also very competitive and affordable. As of now GitHub lacks capabilities when it comes to detailed project management in comparison to tools like Jira, but overall its value for money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonarSource Sarl
    SonarQube is excellent if you start using it at the beginning when developing a new system, in this situation you will be able to fix things before they become spread and expensive to correct. It’s a bit less suitable to use on existing code with bad design as it’s usually too expensive to fix everything and only allows you to ensure the situation doesn’t get worse.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    Veracode helped us our team's developers in saving time significantly. For instance, if I take a library and assume it's going to work until it reaches QA or UAT, where we find out there's a vulnerability, that can require extensive effort for code refactoring or redesigning; Veracode helps prevent that before the pull request is merged.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    GitHub
    • Version control: GitHub provides a powerful and flexible Git-based version control system that allows teams to track changes to their code over time, collaborate on code with others, and maintain a history of their work.
    • Code review: GitHub's pull request system enables teams to review code changes, discuss suggestions and merge changes in a central location. This makes it easier to catch bugs and ensure that code quality remains high.
    • Collaboration: GitHub provides a variety of collaboration tools to help teams work together effectively, including issue tracking, project management, and wikis.
    Read full review
    SonarSource Sarl
    • Detecting bugs and vulnerabilities: SonarQube can identify a wide range of bugs and vulnerabilities in code, such as null pointer exceptions, SQL injection, and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. It uses static analysis to analyze the code and identify potential issues, and it can also integrate with dynamic analysis tools to provide even more detailed analysis.
    • Measuring code quality: SonarQube can measure a wide range of code quality metrics, such as cyclomatic complexity, duplicated code, and code coverage. This can help teams understand the quality of their code and identify areas that need improvement.
    • Providing actionable insights: SonarQube provides detailed information about issues in the code, including the file and line number where the issue occurs and the severity of the issue. This makes it easy for developers to understand and address issues in the code.
    • Integrating with other tools: SonarQube can be integrated with a wide range of development tools and programming languages, such as Git, Maven, and Java. This allows teams to use SonarQube in their existing development workflow and take advantage of its powerful code analysis capabilities.
    • Managing technical debt: SonarQube provides metrics and insights on the technical debt on the codebase, enabling teams to better prioritize issues to improve the quality of the code.
    • Compliance with coding standards: SonarQube can check the code against industry standards like OWASP, CWE and more, making sure the code is compliant with security and coding standards.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    • It is good at recommending fixing issues with third-party dependencies used in application code with detailed version information and knowing which version fixes what.
    • It has a very nice interface for triaging flaws. One can sort the vulnerabilities found in code from Very Likely to be exploited to least likely to be exploited.
    • There is a collections feature that allows us to group together groups of application profiles belonging to the same suite of applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    GitHub
    • Not an easy tool for beginners. Prior command-line experience is expected to get started with GitHub efficiently.
    • Unlike other source control platforms GitHub is a little confusing. With no proper GUI tool its hard to understand the source code version/history.
    • Working with larger files can be tricky. For file sizes above 100MB, GitHub expects the developer to use different commands (lfs).
    • While using the web version of GitHub, it has some restrictions on the number of files that can be uploaded at once. Recommended action is to use the command-line utility to add and push files into the repository.
    Read full review
    SonarSource Sarl
    • Importing a new custom quality profile on SonarQube is a bit tricky, it can be made easier
    • Every second time when we want to rerun the server, we have to restart the whole system, otherwise, the server stops and closes automatically
    • When we generate a new report a second time and try to access the report, it shows details of the old report only and takes a lot of time to get updated with the details of the new and fresh report generated
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    • Scan results stability: from one scan to another, additional flaws appear whereas code did not change.
    • Entry points selection: hard to be sure selection is optimal, should be automatized or hidden.
    • Branches management: we currently use sandboxes to scan different branches of our software. Would be good to have real branches management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    GitHub
    GitHub's ease of use and continued investment into the Developer Experience have made it the de facto tool for our engineers to manage software changes. With new features that continue to come out, we have been able to consolidate several other SaaS solutions and reduce the number of tools required for each engineer to perform their job responsibilities.
    Read full review
    SonarSource Sarl
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    At this time, and we just renewed a month ago, I dont see any products out there overall that can offer what Veracode does. Yes, its not cheap by any means, but for the money its the best application security scanning tool out there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    GitHub
    GitHub is a clean and modern interface. The underlying integrations make it smooth to couple tasks, projects, pull requests and other business functions together. The insights and reporting is really strong and is getting better with every release. GitHub's PR tooling is strong for being web based, i do believe a better code editor would rival having to pull merge conflicts into local IDE.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonarSource Sarl
    It can improve in some user experience and usability parts, like the code view and the way we assign issues it's a bit hidden and not highlighted
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    - Almost no setup required and easy to configure - Very easy to use, intuitive UI with integrated analytics and learning portals. - Seamless to review the results, triage them, generate reports. - Security progression of the product/application is tracked via successive scans. - Privileges/Roles nicely fine grained and tightly controlled to let teams "view" only their products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    GitHub
    No answers on this topic
    SonarSource Sarl
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    Veracode has always been up and available to us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    GitHub
    No answers on this topic
    SonarSource Sarl
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    At this point, it runs well and mostly in a timely fashion. Dynamic scans take days but this may be a config issue still to be resolved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    GitHub
    There are a ton of resources and tutorials for GitHub online. The sheer number of people who use GitHub ensures that someone has the exact answer you are looking for. The docs on GitHub itself are very thorough as well. You will often find an official doc along with the hundreds of independent tutorials that answers your question, which is unusual for most online services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonarSource Sarl
    We we easily able to integrate the SonarQube steps into our TFS process via the Microsoft Marektplace, we didn't have the need to call SonarQube support. We've used their online documentation and community forum if we ran into any issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    Overall, Veracode support is helpful, community support is great, and documentation is available for self-service. Our Customer Success Manager is very helpful and reaches out regularly to see if we need assistance. We have not utilized many of the other resources offered by Veracode, however, in the future we would like to leverage secure coding training for our Development teams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    GitHub
    No answers on this topic
    SonarSource Sarl
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    We use it as a SAS service, so really just getting our teams to mold the use of Veracode into their SDLC has been a process of years in the making. It comes down to what your teams are ready and willing to accept and change. Management is key in getting their groups on board with using it regularly. If it doesnt have management backing, your security teams have little to no influence in getting this process off the ground fully.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    GitHub
    While I don't have very much experience with these 2 solutions, they're two of the most popular alternatives to GitHub. Bitbucket is from Atlassian, which may make sense for a team that is already using other Atlassian tools like Jira, Confluence, and Trello, as their integration will likely be much tighter. Gitlab on the other hand has a reputation as a very capable GitHub replacement with some features that are not available on GitHub like firewall tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonarSource Sarl
    SonarQube is an open-source. It's a scalable product. The costs for this application, for the kind of job it does, are pretty descent. Pipeline scan is more secured in SonarQube. Its a very good tool and its support multiple languages. Its main core competency is of static code analysis and that is why SonarQube exists and it does it exceedingly well. The quality of scan on code convention, best practices, coding standards, unit test coverage etc makes them one of the best competent tool in the market
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    Veracode is slower with scan results however the flaws discovered and sites crawled are almost the same. Rapid7 InsightAppSec only does dynamic scans. Veracode did find more links on a site crawl. Rapid7 InsightAppSec has more out of the box reports than Veracode. Both integration to DevOps tools were striaghtforward.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    GitHub
    No answers on this topic
    SonarSource Sarl
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    No idea
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    GitHub
    No answers on this topic
    SonarSource Sarl
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    It meets our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    GitHub
    • Team collaboration significantly improved as everything is clearly logged and maintained.
    • Maintaining a good overview of items will be delivered wrt the roadmap for example.
    • Knowledge management and tracking. Over time a lot of tickets, issues and comments are logged. GitHub is a great asset to go back and review why x was y.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonarSource Sarl
    • Positive ROI from the standpoint of flagging several issues that would have otherwise likely been unaddressed and caused more time to be spent closer to launch
    • Slightly positive ROI from time-saving perspective (it's an automated check which is nice, but depending on the issues it finds, can take developers time to investigate and resolve)
    Read full review
    Veracode
    • Positive: Scanning all our applications on Veracode provides us an overview of our cyber security posture for the organization as a whole.
    • Positive: Performing the SAST, SCA and DAST scanning for all the applications at the early stages of the SDLC helps us identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities early, reducing the risk of data breaches and cyber-attacks.
    • Negative: Sometimes Veracode SAST scanner closed and reopens some findings, leading to reliability issues on the scanner itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    SonarQube Screenshots

    Screenshot of Projects.Screenshot of Static Application Security Testing.Screenshot of Software Composition Analysis.

    Veracode Screenshots

    Screenshot of a fixScreenshot of the Veracode PlatformScreenshot of SCAScreenshot of SCA Github