GitKraken vs. Plastic SCM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GitKraken
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
GitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.
$0
Plastic SCM
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Plastic SCM is a full stack version control system that aims to make software configuration easy. It focuses on enabling dev teams get work done by facilitating branching, diffing and merging. The vendor says that for those purposes it provides cross-platform apps and GUIs with: Branch explorer Diffing and merging tools (both syntactic and semantic) On-premises and cloud repo management Code review mergebots (last mile…
$6.95
per user
Pricing
GitKrakenPlastic SCM
Editions & Modules
Hosted by GitKraken
Customized according to the amount of team members.
Cloud Edition
$6.95
per user
Team Edition (on prem)
$9.95
per user
Enterprise Edition
$23.25
per user
Enterprise Edition (perpetual)
$595.00
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GitKrakenPlastic SCM
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details* Educational institutions receive a substantial discount on Plastic SCM licensing fees * Corporate/volume pricing is available * For more information, please contact sales at sales@codicesoftware.com
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GitKrakenPlastic SCM
Features
GitKrakenPlastic SCM
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
GitKraken
9.9
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Plastic SCM
-
Ratings
Branching and Merging10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Version History10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Pull Requests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review Tools9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Access Control10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Branch Protection10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GitKrakenPlastic SCM
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.3 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GitKrakenPlastic SCM
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(5 ratings)
8.4
(3 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GitKrakenPlastic SCM
Likelihood to Recommend
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
The software is easy to use and share within our team. Licensing and setup is straightforward. The product just works and we love it.
Read full review
Plastic SCM
Plastic SCM is well suited for the distributed development environment, where branching and merging can easily be handled. Its a good tool for version controlling, especially for a big team which is contributing to a big project simultaneously. Situation where Plastic SCM is not at all well suited are : If the project is smaller one and need to be handled by couple of people. So in that case setting up Plastic SCM and educating people to work on it is not at all efficient
Read full review
Pros
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Customizable workflow steps help organize projects
  • Time tracking down to seconds helps to estimate sprints
  • Burndown charts let you know when to plan your next release
Read full review
Plastic SCM
  • Version Control
  • Organizing Workflow
  • Transparency
Read full review
Cons
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Timing Out - when editing a story or bug, occasionally Axosoft will time out and all changes will be lost
  • Viewing past sprints can be hard to locate
  • Multiple users within a Story - Axosoft could do a better job managing multiple users on the same story
  • User Interface isn't entirely user friendly and looks a bit outdated
Read full review
Plastic SCM
  • Interface
  • Documentation
  • Learning curve
  • Unity integration
Read full review
Usability
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
Over the years, I have used many Git tools, but GitKraken stands out. It's now my favorite Git tool by far—excellent graphical overview of the branches, straightforward usage of all functionality, and lots of integration available. Currently, I am using GitKraken to connect to the ADO and quickly create PRs, using gitflow and tracking the work of my team mates.
Read full review
Plastic SCM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
I actually like JIRA better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets.
Read full review
Plastic SCM
Plastic has best integration with unity - zero issues, native, straightforward. GitHub feels more stable but for smaller and or indie teams plastic s version control feels much more under control - you click, you feel safe. moreover, there is no need for extra tools such as gitkraken, gitlab, Sourcetree, fork, etc. it is really easy to develop games this way.
Read full review
Return on Investment
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Productivity bump for developers over previous software
  • Code is never gone forever and can be found if needed
  • Allows us to collaborate and finish projects faster
Read full review
Plastic SCM
  • Easy to use
  • Cheap
  • Better than git for us
  • Artists love it
Read full review
ScreenShots

GitKraken Screenshots

Screenshot of

Plastic SCM Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of