TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about GitLab

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

GitLab

Connect with GitLab

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with GitLab so that GitLab and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GitLab

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AGitLab is an intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps, where software teams enable AI at every stage of the software lifecycle to ship faster. The platform enables teams to automate repetitive tasks across planning, building, securing, testing, deploying, and maintaining software.

    $0

    per month per user

    Microsoft Visual Studio Code

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft offers Visual Studio Code, an open source text editor that supports code editing, debugging, IntelliSense syntax highlighting, and other features.

    $0

    Pricing
    GitLabMicrosoft Visual Studio Code
    Editions & Modules
    GitLab Free (self-managed)
    $0
    GitLab Free
    $0
    GitLab Premium
    $29
    per month per user
    GitLab Premium (self-managed)
    $29
    per month per user
    GitLab Ultimate
    Contact Sales
    GitLab Ultimate (self-managed)
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GitLabMicrosoft Visual Studio Code
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsGitLab Credits enable flexible, consumption-based access to agentic AI capabilities in the GitLab platform, allowing you to scale AI adoption at your own pace while maintaining cost predictability. Powered by Duo Agent Platform, GitLab’s agentic AI capabilities help software teams to collaborate at AI speed, without compromising quality and enterprise security. If usage exceeds monthly allocations and overage terms are accepted, automated on-demand billing activates without service interruption, so your developers never lose access to AI capabilities they need. Real-time dashboards provide transparency into AI consumption patterns. Software teams can see usage across users, projects, and groups with granular attribution for cost allocation. Automated threshold alerts facilitate proactive planning. Advanced analytics deliver trending, forecasting, and FinOps integration.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GitLabMicrosoft Visual Studio Code
    Considered Both Products
    GitLab
    Chose GitLab
    I liked GitLab better than Beanstalk. GitLab had a free option, which Beanstalk did not at the time. From what I have used of Bitbucket, I probably like it better than GitLab, specifically I like the design better. Doing things in Bitbucket seemed a bit slower to me though. Now …
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    Why we chose GitLab: we started long ago with free access and it was always good enough, so we never bothered to switch.
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    Because with Visual Studio code, it was very easy for us to install GitLab in it and have easy access through the terminal and due to GitLab, it was easy to implement codes regarding API and AWS services to make our software better. Gitlens and all features help to check the …
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    GitLab has a open-source community and great documentation that provides support resources and community contributions. AWS CodeCommit is used for integration with other AWS services in the AWS ecosystem and also have a low community and support compared to GitLab hence …
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    It was a management decision to use GitLab over other tools. It integrates well with RBAC using Terraform. Runners are easy to setup. Almost all the features the organization used before are available in GitLab.
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    The first thing is other products except GitLab is there is very costly and does not have any customise thing. Gitlab is an open-source license product that makes its use easier and more cost-effective that's why we have chosen Gitlab among other products with the same …
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    Gitlab is more effective and easy to use as compared to GitHub. It has better role management features.
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    Gitlab made our product life cycle efficient. It has a better user interface and user experience. GitLab doesn't clutter with many features upfront and provides a lot of free services, which is missing in any other product. For small teams, it's the best piece of software. I …
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    The main reason for selecting GitLab over the others is that the free version also we have most of the functionalities available. We can create private repositories, assign different permissions to different users, can create a good number of users, so almost everything you …
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    Gitlab is very well organized compared with the other VCS software Merge request option is the best option compared with the other companies The role of the administration is very easy to set and understand To track the issues/features and discuss with your teammates seems …
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    The choice to use GitLab was a business choice recommended by other colleagues who already used it.
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    GitLab can be installed OnPrem, and in my company, we had to choose a solution that was not on the Cloud.
    • Open source.
    • Several security / fix updates per month.
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    It terms of ease of use, product functionality, lack of bugs, developer support, etc.:

    GitLab > GitHub > Bitbucket > Self-hosting
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    The licensing of the IntelliJ IDEs is prohibitive, I cannot be sure that I can continue to leverage them as I move between clients.

    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    Microsoft Visual Studio Code is free
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    Notepad++ is a great tool, but has most of the power tips and tools of notepad++ are available into Microsoft Visual Studio Code I use less and less notepad++. It's more easier to "stay" into Microsoft Visual Studio Code, open a new window do my stuff and go for the next task.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    When you start using [Microsoft Visual Studio Code], it lands more on the "text editor" side of the spectrum, akin to Vim/Emacs/Sublime. Aligned with this, it's fast and easy to install and setup, and competes with the best of them as a great general purpose tool. But then it …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    In my opinion, VS Code is the best option for coding. It works on Windows, GNU/Linux, and macOS. Moreover, there's a great team/community behind the scene to maintain this program.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    Visual Studio Code is lightweight. The community is important and grows every day. It is easily configured.
    It works perfectly on our Linux workstations. The other IDE mentioned do not combine all these advantages.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    97%
    Would buy again
    150 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    70 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    135 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    69 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    152 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    70 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    50 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    120 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    63 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    GitLabMicrosoft Visual Studio Code
    Small Businesses
    GitGuardian
    Score9 out of 10
    BBEdit
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Vim
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Vim
    Score9.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GitLabMicrosoft Visual Studio Code
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.6
    (168 ratings)
    9.5
    (104 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    9.4
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.8
    (20 ratings)
    9.4
    (21 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (12 ratings)
    9.7
    (23 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GitLabMicrosoft Visual Studio Code
    Likelihood to Recommend
    GitLab
    In general it's a good product with a huge number of features. It can do CI/CD checks, deployment, repo hosting, integrations etc. A lot of it can be managed from just the UI but also has an ok API. It does tend to release new features semi-often too which is nice. It can have a steep learning curve for certain features so not a starter-friendly vendor, but great for most businesses.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    As a general workhorse IDE, Microsoft Visual Studio Codee is unmatched. Building on the early success of applications such as Atom, it has long been the standard for electron based IDEs. It can be outshone using IDEs that are dedicated to particular platforms, such as Microsoft Visual Studio Code for .net and the Jetbrains IDEs for Java, Python and others. For remote collaborative development, something like Zed is ahead of VSCode live share, which can be quite flakey.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    GitLab
    • GitLab excels in managing code versions, allowing easy tracking of changes, branch management, and merging contributions.
    • It helps maintain code stability and reliability, saving time and effort in the development or research workflow.
    • Powerful code review features, enabling collaboration and feedback among team members.
    • Robust project management features, including issue tracking, kanban boards, and milestones.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Integrate with the git repository very well.
    • Integrated copilot chat is very helpful to write code snippets and helps beginners to start with coding and development.
    • Great library of available extensions is one of the best features in Microsoft Visual Studio Code.
    • Dedicated Testing option to configure pytest and others are quite handy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    GitLab
    • CI variables management is sometimes hard to use, for example, with File type variables. The scope of each variable is also hard to guess.
    • Access Token: there are too many types (Personal, Project, global..), and it is hard to identify the scope and where it comes from once created.
    • Runners: auto-scaled runners are for the moment hard to put in place, and monitoring is not easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • The customization of key combinations should be more accessible and easier to change
    • The auxiliary panels could be minimized or as floating tabs which are displayed when you click on them
    • A monitoring panel of resources used by Microsoft Visual Studio Code or plugins and extensions would help a lot to be able to detect any malfunction of these
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    GitLab
    I really feel the platform has matured quite faster than others, and it is always at the top of its game compared to the different vendors like GitHub, Azure pipelines, CircleCI, Travis, Jenkins. Since it provides, agents, CI/CD, repository hosting, Secrets management, user management, and Single Sign on; among other features
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Solid tool that provides everything you need to develop most types of applications. The only reason not a 10 is that if you are doing large distributed teams on Enterprise level, Professional does provide more tools to support that and would be worth the cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    GitLab
    - As a combination of features and products, GitLab is a really great tool for developers. - Also, it comes with both light and quick changes in a web browser version, as well as pro work in VS Code mode. However, in certain areas, such as large-scale issues/incidents, management can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Visual Studio Code earns a 10 for its exceptional balance of power and simplicity. Its intuitive interface, robust extension ecosystem, and integrated terminal streamline development. With seamless Git integration and highly customizable settings, it adapts perfectly to any workflow, making complex coding tasks feel effortless for beginners and experts alike.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    GitLab
    I've never had experienced outages from GItlab itself, but regarding the code I have deployed to Gitlab, the history helps a lot to trace the cause of the issue or performing a rollback to go back to a working version
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Overall, Microsoft Visual Studio Code is pretty reliable. Every so often, though, the app will experience an unexplained crash. Since it is a stand-alone app, connectivity or service issues don't occur in my experience. Restarting the app seems to always get around the problem, but I do make sure to save and backup current work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    GitLab
    GItlab reponsiveness is amazing, has never left me IDLE. I've never had issues even with complex projects. I have not experienced any issues when integrating it with agents for example or SSO
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Visual Studio Code is pretty snappy in performance terms. It launches quickly, and tasks are performed quickly. I don't have a lot of integrations other than CoPilot, but I suspect that if the integration partner is provisioned appropriately that any performance impact would be pretty minimal. It doesn't have a lot of bells and whistles (unless you start adding plugins left and right).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    GitLab
    At this point, I do not have much experience with Gitlab support as I have never had to engage them. They have documentation that is helpful, not quite as extensive as other documentation, but helpful nonetheless. They also seem to be relatively responsive on social media platforms (twitter) and really thrived when GitHub was acquired by Microsoft
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Active development means filing a bug on the GitHub repo typically gets you a response within 4 days. There are plugins for almost everything you need, whether it be linting, Vim emulation, even language servers (which I use to code in Scala). There is well-maintained official documentation. The only thing missing is forums. The closest thing is GitHub issues, which typically has the answers but is hard to sift through -- there are currently 78k issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    GitLab
    GitHub is an inferior product from most points of view. We had to use it and the teams finds no positives about it. Everything is a downgrade from our previous GitLab solution. GitLab CI\CD is vastly superior to workflows, for example doing a manual node is just "when : manual" in GitLab while you have to do clickops in GitHub to achieve the same. No overview of code in branches is a minus when we tried to figure out what our colleagues are trying to merge as it looked off.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Visual Studio Code stacks up nicely against Visual Studio because of the price and because it can be installed without admin rights. We don't exclusively use Visual Studio Code, but rather use Visual Studio and Visual Studio code depending on the project and which version of source control the given project is wired up to.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    GitLab
    I think is very well designed, and like any VCS it works as intended
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It is easily deployed with our Jamf Pro instance. There is actually very little setup involved in getting the app deployed, and it is fairly well self-contained and does not deploy a large amount of associated files. However, it is not particularly conducive to large project, multi-developer/department projects that involve some form of central integration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    GitLab
    • GitLab cut down our spent on container, package and infrastructure registry
    • Best thing is we can now have everything in single platform which cost effective too
    • Quality of support is really good and they do have emergency support team as well which is great
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Saves money by replacing suites of tools such as Visual Studio, IntelliJ, etc.
    • Speeds development time and developer environment setup time
    • Strengthens code quality with integrated autoformatting and linting
    • Strengths Git practices by keeping version control tightly connected with the code
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    GitLab Screenshots

    Screenshot of What is Intelligent Orchestration for DevSecOps?Screenshot of an overview of GitLab Duo Agent PlatformScreenshot of a new agent creation screen