TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google BigQuery vs. SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) vs. Snowflake

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google BigQuery

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AGoogle's BigQuery is part of the Google Cloud Platform, a database-as-a-service (DBaaS) supporting the querying and rapid analysis of enterprise data.

    $6.25

    per TiB (after the 1st 1 TiB per month, which is free)

    SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AThe SAP BPC software is designed to help users plan and achieve a faster, more accurate close. The SAP BPC software aims to help users spend more time growing their business and less time closing books. The vendor’s value proposition is that their software delivers planning, budgeting, forecasting, and financial consolidation capabilities in a single application. This, in turn, enables them to easily adjust plans and forecasts, speed up budget and closing cycles, and ensure compliance with…N/A

    Snowflake

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AThe Snowflake Cloud Data Platform is the eponymous data warehouse with, from the company in San Mateo, a cloud and SQL based DW that aims to allow users to unify, integrate, analyze, and share previously siloed data in secure, governed, and compliant ways. With it, users can securely access the Data Cloud to share live data with customers and business partners, and connect with other organizations doing business as data consumers, data providers, and data service providers.N/A
    Pricing
    Google BigQuerySAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)Snowflake
    Editions & Modules
    Standard edition
    $0.04 / slot hour
    Enterprise edition
    $0.06 / slot hour
    Enterprise Plus edition
    $0.10 / slot hour
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google BigQuerySAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)Snowflake
    Free Trial
    YesNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google BigQuerySAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)Snowflake
    Considered Multiple Products
    Google
    Chose Google BigQuery
    Fully serverless. We don’t manage clusters or warehouses. Requires us to manage virtual warehouses. BigQuery is cheaper for exploratory heavy queries; Snowflake is more predictable for sustained workloads. BigQuery is unbeatable if you’re deep in Google’s ecosystem; Snowflake
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    We actually use Snowflake and BigQuery in tandem because they both currently meet various needs. Redshift, however, has barely been used since our migration away from it. In the case of both Snowflake and BigQuery, they beat Redshift by a long shot. The main reasons are their …
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    Google BigQuery is cheaper and much faster as compared to both. While as compared to Snowflake , we tested it was faster and cheaper by 30%, that is after Snowflake tweaked their environment, if not for that it would have been 90% cheaper than Snowflake. Redshift is not easy …
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    Google BigQuery is less expensive to run and offers free storage of up to the first 10 GB of data. Google BigQuery is also easier (and faster) to get up and running. Unlike Snowflake, Google BigQuery does not require any manual scaling or performance tuning. Scaling is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    I have used Snowflake and DataGrip for data retrieval as well as Google BigQuery and can say that all these tools compete for head to head. It is very difficult to say which is better than the other but some features provided by Google BigQuery give it an edge over the others. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    Google BigQuery of course collects a much much larger array of raw data and can handle (practically) an unlimited amount of data. For a large enterprise like ours that relies on large-scale analytics, this is absolutely imperative. Google BigQuery can also combine GA4 data with …
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    Compared to every other analytics DB solution I've used, Google BigQuery was by far the easiest to set up and maintain, and scale.
    The price was also much lower for our use case (internal data analysis).
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    First and foremost, Google BigQuery's pricing structure, based on data processing and storage, is more cost-effective for our needs. Secondly, since we already use other Google Cloud services, its tight integration with them especially, with Cloud Storage and Dataflow was a big …
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    We based our analysis primarily on [BigQuery vs. Redshift vs. Athena] and BigQuery proved to be the best solution for us.
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    At my previous organization we used server based SQL server. There were days when the server was down and we couldn't work or access the data. This caused multiple reports and processes which were fed from the server to fail. Google BigQuery doesn't have such problems.
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    Both BigQuery and Redshift are two comparable fully managed petabyte-scale cloud data warehouses. They’re similar in many ways, but you should consider their unique features and how they can contribute to an organization’s data analytics infrastructure. When considering which …
    Incentivized
    Chose Google BigQuery
    BigQuery by far the best solution in all angles compared to other ones: Especially scalability, ease of use, performance and there is no need to manage any cluster of servers. Also it's ABSOLUTELY pay as you go! No one in market currently provide such service that can compete …
    Incentivized
    SAP
    No answer on this topic
    Snowflake Computing
    Chose Snowflake
    These are comparable products that can make sense depending on the specific needs of your organization. All are certainly serviceable and have varying pros and cons. Snowflake seems to provide the greatest degree of flexibility and easy scalability as new data gets brought into …
    Incentivized
    Chose Snowflake
    Snowflake has an attractive pricing model with auto-suspend and auto-resume and pay per use. AWS Redshift requires higher administrative efforts to maintain and scale the platform whereas with Snowflake those admin tasks are not needed or automatically taken care of.
    Incentivized
    Chose Snowflake
    We particularly liked Snowflake's security model as well as its unique storage (whereby everything is essentially a pointer to immutable micro-partitions, which is the key behind its zero-copy cloning, its secure sharing, its time travel, etc.). and also how it separates …
    Incentivized
    Chose Snowflake
    Each of the other solutions were cloud vendor specific, Snowflake can ride on either Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud. The fact that they are ANSI-sql compliant and have an effective means of offloading data makes them portable and easy to sell to teams …
    Incentivized
    Chose Snowflake
    Snowflake has won the match because it is giving an excellent performance with its efficient features and reliable results. This is a totally secure program for our precious and important data.
    Incentivized
    Chose Snowflake
    Snowflake beats these other products in every category it was rated against
    Incentivized
    Chose Snowflake
    In my experience running the data management practice at InterWorks, we believe that cloud data warehouse products will eventually serve the majority of data warehousing use cases and power data analytics at most companies. Of this cohort, we believe that Snowflake is the best …
    Incentivized
    Chose Snowflake
    Our issue with Redshift was that it was very expensive. On top of that, queries were still slow and if we used more of Redshift's memory, then it would have cost even more. Snowflake is not cheap, but less costly for us. Plus, the performance was much better. Also, we got to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Snowflake
    More flexible and faster compared to Redshift, more functionality compared to BigQuery e.g. - per minute billing, instant spin up of warehouse. Overall, the cost and time savings swayed us in favor of Snowflake.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    98%
    Would buy again
    64 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    30 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    56 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    28 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    63 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    30 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    42 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    23 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    59 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    25 Answers
    Features
    Google BigQuerySAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)Snowflake
    Database-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Google BigQuery and SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) and Snowflake
    Feature
    Google BigQuery
    8.5
    80 Ratings
    1% above category average
    SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
    -
    Ratings
    Snowflake
    -
    Ratings
    Automatic software patching8.017 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database scalability9.079 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated backups8.524 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database security provisions8.873 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Monitoring and metrics8.675 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic host deployment8.013 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Google BigQuery and SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) and Snowflake
    Feature
    Google BigQuery
    -
    Ratings
    SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
    7.8
    41 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Snowflake
    -
    Ratings
    Long-term financial planning00 Ratings7.535 Ratings00 Ratings
    Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.137 Ratings00 Ratings
    Forecasting00 Ratings7.840 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scenario modeling00 Ratings7.336 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management reporting00 Ratings8.140 Ratings00 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Google BigQuery and SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) and Snowflake
    Feature
    Google BigQuery
    -
    Ratings
    SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
    7.3
    40 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Snowflake
    -
    Ratings
    Financial data consolidation00 Ratings8.436 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports00 Ratings7.330 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-currency management00 Ratings6.928 Ratings00 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings6.930 Ratings00 Ratings
    Minority Ownership00 Ratings7.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings6.433 Ratings00 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.227 Ratings00 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Google BigQuery and SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) and Snowflake
    Feature
    Google BigQuery
    -
    Ratings
    SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
    7.3
    40 Ratings
    11% below category average
    Snowflake
    -
    Ratings
    Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings8.035 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management Reporting00 Ratings7.240 Ratings00 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings7.539 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings6.430 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Google BigQuery and SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) and Snowflake
    Feature
    Google BigQuery
    -
    Ratings
    SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
    5.6
    36 Ratings
    30% below category average
    Snowflake
    -
    Ratings
    Personalized dashboards00 Ratings5.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings6.922 Ratings00 Ratings
    KPIs00 Ratings3.031 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings7.628 Ratings00 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings4.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings7.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of Google BigQuery and SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) and Snowflake
    Feature
    Google BigQuery
    -
    Ratings
    SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
    6.4
    39 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Snowflake
    -
    Ratings
    Flat file integration00 Ratings6.935 Ratings00 Ratings
    Excel data integration00 Ratings6.837 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings5.425 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google BigQuerySAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)Snowflake
    Small Businesses
    MongoDB Atlas
    Score7.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Azure Database
    Score8.8 out of 10
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Amazon Redshift
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Cloud SQL
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score7.2 out of 10
    Amazon Redshift
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google BigQuerySAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)Snowflake
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (79 ratings)
    7.4
    (41 ratings)
    9.0
    (44 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.1
    (5 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    6.6
    (6 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.8
    (20 ratings)
    Availability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    4.8
    (11 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.9
    (8 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    6.7
    (39 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google BigQuerySAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)Snowflake
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Event-based data can be captured seamlessly from our data layers (and exported to Google BigQuery). When events like page-views, clicks, add-to-cart are tracked, Google BigQuery can help efficiently with running queries to observe patterns in user behaviour. That intermediate step of trying to "untangle" event data is resolved by Google BigQuery. A scenario where it could possibly be less appropriate is when analysing "granular" details (like small changes to a database happening very frequently).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) overall is a good package and has helped improve our reporting a lot whilst also making it more efficient due to the reliability of data input / output. There are limitations like graphs being so limited in functionality and reports failing when too much data being processed however i would recommend to others.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Snowflake Computing
    Snowflake is well suited when you have to store your data and you want easy scalability and increase or decrease the storage per your requirement. You can also control the computing cost, and if your computing cost is less than or equal to 10% of your storage cost, then you don't have to pay for computing, which makes it cost-effective as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Realtime integration with Google Sheets.
    • GSheet data can be linked to a BigQuery table and the data in that sheet is ingested in realtime into BigQuery. It's a live 'sync' which means it supports insertions, deletions, and alterations. The only limitation here is the schema'; this remains static once the table is created.
    • Seamless integration with other GCP products.
    • A simple pipeline might look like this:-
    • GForms -> GSheets -> BigQuery -> Looker
    • It all links up really well and with ease.
    • One instance holds many projects.
    • Separating data into datamarts or datameshes is really easy in BigQuery, since one BigQuery instance can hold multiple projects; which are isolated collections of datasets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • SAP BPC is real time data. You can send information into the system and see it reflected in your reports immediately. Other systems may require a manual push into a reporting system.
    • SAP BPC is a shared reporting tool, so multiple users can be working in a model/environment at the same time, real time. This is especially helpful if your workbooks incorporated multiple processes requiring multiple users to get into the same model.
    • SAP BPC is a powerful tool designed to help all facets of the company, from cash flow to capital expenditures to headcount management to financial planning to consolidation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Snowflake Computing
    • Snowflake scales appropriately allowing you to manage expense for peak and off peak times for pulling and data retrieval and data centric processing jobs
    • Snowflake offers a marketplace solution that allows you to sell and subscribe to different data sources
    • Snowflake manages concurrency better in our trials than other premium competitors
    • Snowflake has little to no setup and ramp up time
    • Snowflake offers online training for various employee types
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Please expand the availability of documentation, tutorials, and community forums to provide developers with comprehensive support and guidance on using Google BigQuery effectively for their projects.
    • If possible, simplify the pricing model and provide clearer cost breakdowns to help users understand and plan for expenses when using Google BigQuery. Also, some cost reduction is welcome.
    • It still misses the process of importing data into Google BigQuery. Probably, by improving compatibility with different data formats and sources and reducing the complexity of data ingestion workflows, it can be made to work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • SAP should focus on delivering one single product for planning, consolidation and budgeting needs rather than providing a large list of options to choose from.
    • The product is not very user-friendly compared to other cloud competitors. There is a heavy dependency on IT teams.
    • SAP BPC should come up a pure cloud option.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Snowflake Computing
    • Add constraints for views and not just for tables
    • Do not force customers to renew for same or higher amount to avoid loosing unused credits. Already paid credits should not expire (at least within a reasonable time frame), independent of renewal deal size.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    We have to use this product as its a 3rd party supplier choice to utilise this product for their data side backend so will not be likely we will move away from this product in the future unless the 3rd party supplier decides to change data vendors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Snowflake Computing
    SnowFlake is very cost effective and we also like the fact we can stop, start and spin up additional processing engines as we need to. We also like the fact that it's easy to connect our SQL IDEs to Snowflake and write our queries in the environment that we are used to
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    I think overall it is easy to use. I haven't done anything from the development side but an more of an end user of reporting tables built in Google BigQuery. I connect data visualization tools like Tableau or Power BI to the BigQuery reporting tables to analyze trends and create complex dashboards.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    Unlike other SAP traditional products, SAP BPC was meant to be simple and familiar to financial users
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Snowflake Computing
    Because the fact that you can query tons of data in a few seconds is incredible, it also gives you a lot of functions to format and transform data right in your query, which is ideal when building data models in BI tools like Power BI, it is available as a connector in the most used BI tools worldwide.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Google
    I have never had any significant issues with Google Big Query. It always seems to be up and running properly when I need it. I cannot recall any times where I received any kind of application errors or unplanned outages. If there were any they were resolved quickly by my IT team so I didn't notice them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Snowflake Computing
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Google
    I think Google Big Query's performance is in the acceptable range. Sometimes larger datasets are somewhat sluggish to load but for most of our applications it performs at a reasonable speed. We do have some reports that include a lot of complex calculations and others that run on granular store level data that so sometimes take a bit longer to load which can be frustrating.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Snowflake Computing
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Google
    BigQuery can be difficult to support because it is so solid as a product. Many of the issues you will see are related to your own data sets, however you may see issues importing data and managing jobs. If this occurs, it can be a challenge to get to speak to the correct person who can help you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    We need a big support team with various skillset like BPC, ABAP, BW, HANA, FICO etc
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Snowflake Computing
    We have had terrific experiences with Snowflake support. They have drilled into queries and given us tremendous detail and helpful answers. In one case they even figured out how a particular product was interacting with Snowflake, via its queries, and gave us detail to go back to that product's vendor because the Snowflake support team identified a fault in its operation. We got it solved without lots of back-and-forth or finger-pointing because the Snowflake team gave such detailed information.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    SAP BPC training content and trainers are very good. The training is structured and provides a very good understanding of the product features and functionalities. I attended 6 separate training sessions of week-long or more. I had very good experience in all the sessions. The training is organized very well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Snowflake Computing
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    SAP Training contents are very good, informative and exhaustive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Snowflake Computing
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    The implementation was carried out in two phases spread over a period of 4 years with 2 upgrades in between. We also had multiple upgrades to HANA.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Snowflake Computing
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    PowerBI can connect to GA4 for example but the data processing is more complicated and it takes longer to create dashboards. Azure is great once the data import has been configured but it's not an easy task for small businesses as it is with BigQuery.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    With Hyperion we struggled as it didn’t have integrated planning and consolidation, whereas BPC does have it. BPC is easier for reporting as it is Excel-based. Also BPC has prepackaged business process flows that helped a lot. Hyperion on the other hand has a faster response time for user queries or report generation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Snowflake Computing
    I have had the experience of using one more database management system at my previous workplace. What Snowflake provides is better user-friendly consoles, suggestions while writing a query, ease of access to connect to various BI platforms to analyze, [and a] more robust system to store a large amount of data. All these functionalities give the better edge to Snowflake.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Google
    None so far. Very satisfied with the transparency on contract terms and pricing model.
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Snowflake Computing
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Google
    We have continued to expand out use of Google Big Query over the years. I'd say its flexibility and scalability is actually quite good. It also integrates well with other tools like Tableau and Power BI. It has served the needs of multiple data sources across multiple departments within my company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Snowflake Computing
    No answers on this topic
    Professional Services
    Google
    Google Support has kindly provide individual support and consultants to assist with the integration work. In the circumstance where the consultants are not present to support with the work, Google Support Helpline will always be available to answer to the queries without having to wait for more than 3 days.
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Snowflake Computing
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • Previously, running complex queries on our on-premise data warehouse could take hours. Google BigQuery processes the same queries in minutes. We estimate it saves our team at least 25% of their time.
    • We can target our marketing campaigns very easily and understand our customer behaviour. It lets us personalize marketing campaigns and product recommendations and experience at least a 20% improvement in overall campaign performance.
    • Now, we only pay for the resources we use. Saved $1 million annually on data infrastructure and data storage costs compared to our previous solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • When originally implemented (as the predecessor product Outlooksoft) BPC took ASU from trying to budget and forecast for a 2B enterprise out of spreadsheets and into a far more consolidated tool. It has saved us considerable time over the years and paid for itself several times over.
    • BPC also allows us to present our budget in multiple different views to support management, board and departmental reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Snowflake Computing
    • With separate compute and storage feature, the queries get executed quickly and it improves our overall productivity.
    • Earlier we were using a different product for analytical purposes, but with Snowflake's in-built analytical feature we are now able to save money.
    • Snowflake is cost efficient, features like auto suspend for compute resources helped to control the costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Google BigQuery Screenshots

    Screenshot of Migrating data warehouses to BigQuery - Features a streamlined migration path from Netezza, Oracle, Redshift, Teradata, or Snowflake to BigQuery using the fully managed BigQuery Migration Service.Screenshot of bringing any data into BigQuery - Data files can be uploaded from local sources, Google Drive, or Cloud Storage buckets, using BigQuery Data Transfer Service (DTS), Cloud Data Fusion plugins, by replicating data from relational databases with Datastream for BigQuery, or by leveraging Google's data integration partnerships.Screenshot of generative AI use cases with BigQuery and Gemini models - Data pipelines that blend structured data, unstructured data and generative AI models together can be built to create a new class of analytical applications. BigQuery integrates with Gemini 1.0 Pro using Vertex AI. The Gemini 1.0 Pro model is designed for higher input/output scale and better result quality across a wide range of tasks like text summarization and sentiment analysis. It can be accessed using simple SQL statements or BigQuery’s embedded DataFrame API from right inside the BigQuery console.Screenshot of insights derived from images, documents, and audio files, combined with structured data - Unstructured data represents a large portion of untapped enterprise data. However, it can be challenging to interpret, making it difficult to extract meaningful insights from it. Leveraging the power of BigLake, users can derive insights from images, documents, and audio files using a broad range of AI models including Vertex AI’s vision, document processing, and speech-to-text APIs, open-source TensorFlow Hub models, or custom models.Screenshot of event-driven analysis - Built-in streaming capabilities automatically ingest streaming data and make it immediately available to query. This allows users to make business decisions based on the freshest data. Or Dataflow can be used to enable simplified streaming data pipelines.Screenshot of predicting business outcomes AI/ML - Predictive analytics can be used to streamline operations, boost revenue, and mitigate risk. BigQuery ML democratizes the use of ML by empowering data analysts to build and run models using existing business intelligence tools and spreadsheets.

    SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) Screenshots

    Screenshot of SAP BPC Home ScreenScreenshot of SAP BPC Web ClientScreenshot of SAP BPC DashboardScreenshot of SAP BPC Web Report

    Snowflake Screenshots

    Screenshot of Snowflake Installation