TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about HCL Unica

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

HCLSoftware

Connect with HCLSoftware

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with HCLSoftware so that HCLSoftware and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    HCL Unica

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AHCL Unica is available as a cloud or on-premise solution that provides fully integrated marketing automation software for enterprise. It includes enterprise marketing automation tools that optimize marketing activities, to ensure excellent customer experiences and data privacy.N/A

    Kubernetes

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AKubernetes is an open-source container cluster manager.N/A

    Red Hat OpenShift

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AOpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

    $0.08

    per hour

    Pricing
    HCL UnicaKubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HCL UnicaKubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    HCL UnicaKubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Considered Multiple Products
    HCLSoftware
    No answer on this topic
    Kubernetes
    Chose Kubernetes
    I used OpenShift v2 - which was pre-Kubernetes. (It now uses Kubernetes under the hood - but keeps it fairly hidden). Kubernetes was a ton more stable and easier to use. No more custom CLI to use in order to script together deployments. No more messy ‘push your entire code …
    Incentivized
    Chose Kubernetes
    It stacks well against OpenShift. The only downside for OpenShift is the multiple operators and the custom logic implemented in the product, plus the upgrades, which tend to be a bit longer due to the more complex implementation. Overall, these are similar products but with a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Kubernetes
    Kubernetes cluster is cable to manage multiple nodes on on-premises or cloud infrastructure. In Kubernetes, we can easily add new nodes when ever required. We can easily update and rollback our application hosted on Kubernetes with the help of rolling and blue green deployment. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Kubernetes
    I didn't have too much experience or exposure to OpenShift but I do remember that in certain areas our organization found Kubernetes to be more useful and met our needs in comparison to OpenShift. Although I can't compare, I think it's easier to customize Kubernetes because of …
    Incentivized
    Red Hat
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    We looked at a few other options like plain Kubernetes and some managed services, but Red Hat OpenShift stood out because it’s enterprise-ready out of the box. The built-in security, automation tools, and support made a big difference.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Comparing the 2, open source Kubernetes is quicker to setup by about 75%, less restrictive, and free of course, but it lacks the security and support of Red Hat, and deploying features is much harder compared to with operators. For buisiness purposes, OpenShift is just more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    I don't have as much experience with the other two, I have heard of them and know they are container management systems. I have the most experience with Red Hat OpenShift.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    In my experience, Red Hat OpenShift is Much much easier to provision
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    We explore a lot of services to use in. But in todays world everything is cloud and the on premise solutions are not very strong until we discover Red Hat OpenShift which still very committed to maintain on premise solutions, we select Openshift and since first day we are very …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Red Hat OpenShift was the product that my team has been using since I've joined so it has been the only product in this area that I have used. With that being said, I have really no complaints and love implemented Red Hat OpenShift in my work to help be more efficient with my …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    greate UI UX, easy to use, even when you have no clue about any command lines, you still can manage your apps. Also, public documentation is great, if you search for anything you can find it online. A great community and a support system
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Better GUI
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    It definitely has additional bells and vessels like SM, UI and monitoring/logging stack
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    To benefit from premium support.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    It's a fairly different experience compared to the other environments due to the additional security
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    ease of use
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Red Hat OpenShift has a better security posture than EKS. I enjoy the console on Red Hat OpenShift more as well. I believe there is greater observability for Red Hat OpenShift.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    They are great addition to the Red Hat OpenShift itself
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    It is a good and entertaining tool

    Es una herramientas Buena y entretenidad
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Red Hat runs in multiple cloud and on-premise environments, so offers a portable experience in different contexts.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    RedHat OpenShift can run on-prem and on Azure, meaning we can get support from RedHat from two platforms, despite it being on those different platforms.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    315 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    268 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    322 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    218 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    75%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    255 Answers
    Features
    HCL UnicaKubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Email & Online Marketing
    Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of HCL Unica and Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    HCL Unica
    9.6
    3 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Kubernetes
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift
    -
    Ratings
    WYSIWYG email editor9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dynamic content9.24 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ability to test dynamic content9.24 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Landing pages9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    A/B testing9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile optimization9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email deliverability reporting9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    List management9.53 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Triggered drip sequences10.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Lead Management
    Comparison of Lead Management features of HCL Unica and Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    HCL Unica
    9.7
    2 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Kubernetes
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift
    -
    Ratings
    Lead nurturing automation9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Lead scoring and grading9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data quality management9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated sales alerts and tasks9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Lead segmentation and distribution9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Campaign Management
    Comparison of Campaign Management features of HCL Unica and Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    HCL Unica
    9.4
    2 Ratings
    24% above category average
    Kubernetes
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift
    -
    Ratings
    Calendaring9.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Event/webinar marketing9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Social Media Marketing
    Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of HCL Unica and Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    HCL Unica
    9.7
    2 Ratings
    26% above category average
    Kubernetes
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift
    -
    Ratings
    Social sharing and campaigns9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Social profile integration9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of HCL Unica and Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    HCL Unica
    9.7
    2 Ratings
    27% above category average
    Kubernetes
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of HCL Unica and Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    HCL Unica
    9.6
    2 Ratings
    24% above category average
    Kubernetes
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift
    -
    Ratings
    API9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based workflow & approvals9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizability9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with Salesforce.com9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with Microsoft Dynamics CRM9.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Third-party software integrations9.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of HCL Unica and Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    HCL Unica
    -
    Ratings
    Kubernetes
    9.2
    4 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Red Hat OpenShift
    -
    Ratings
    Security and Isolation00 Ratings9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Container Orchestration00 Ratings9.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cluster Management00 Ratings9.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Storage Management00 Ratings8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discovery Tools00 Ratings9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of HCL Unica and Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    HCL Unica
    -
    Ratings
    Kubernetes
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift
    8.4
    324 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings00 Ratings8.6275 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings00 Ratings9.3309 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings00 Ratings8.3290 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings00 Ratings8.6262 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings00 Ratings8.3291 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.5273 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.6283 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings00 Ratings8.3270 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings00 Ratings7.9284 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings00 Ratings8.1279 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings00 Ratings8.5285 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    HCL UnicaKubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Small Businesses
    Vbout
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Bloomreach
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Iterable
    Score8.2 out of 10
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HCL UnicaKubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (19 ratings)
    8.7
    (19 ratings)
    9.1
    (339 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (13 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.3
    (26 ratings)
    Usability
    8.8
    (5 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    8.5
    (10 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (125 ratings)
    Support Rating
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (9 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HCL UnicaKubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Likelihood to Recommend
    HCLSoftware
    I think it is wel suited for a business with a lot of one on one relations in the database. For example a supermarket that sells products to a client and gives a reduction on that product. It is nice if the selection process is not to complex and does not involve to many calculations. It is also nice if it is very clear what you want to follow up. In our environment we have lots of many-to-many relations. for example one product is held by more then one client. And that client might have more of those products with other clients. These kind of situation demands for a lot of calculations with derived fields(*), and there things go far too slow. Unica is probably not such a good solution for us, because our environment is too complex, and so is to process of creating the selection, we often have to change things in the selection flows. Because of the complexity it is difficult to see what the flow is exactly doing afterwoods, it also takes to much time to modify existing campaigns. The interface is not handy to work with, if you have long lists of variables, of tables or derived fields(*) you have to scroll through trough them, you can not really search them or reorder them. You can not drag and drop fields or other objects like derived fields in the flow, what would be easy if you have to make frequent changes to the proces flow. When you copy objects something the content of the object changes because the links with other objects or lost. (*) derived field: field to calculate something
    Read full review
    Kubernetes
    K8s should be avoided - If your application works well without being converted into microservices-based architecture & fits correctly in a VM, needs less scaling, have a fixed traffic pattern then it is better to keep away from Kubernetes. Otherwise, the operational challenges & technical expertise will add a lot to the OPEX. Also, if you're the one who thinks that containers consume fewer resources as compared to VMs then this is not true. As soon as you convert your application to a microservice-based architecture, a lot of components will add up, shooting your resource consumption even higher than VMs so, please beware. Kubernetes is a good choice - When the application needs quick scaling, is already in microservice-based architecture, has no fixed traffic pattern, most of the employees already have desired skills.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    Red Hat OpenShift, despite its complexity and overhead, remains the most complete and enterprise-ready Kubernetes platform available. It excels in research projects like ours, where we need robust CI/CD, GPU scheduling, and tight integration with tools like Jupyter, OpenDataHub, and Quiskit. Its security, scalability, and operator ecosystem make it ideal for experimental and production-grade AI workloads. However, for simpler general hosting tasks—such as serving static websites or lightweight backend services—we find traditional VMs, Docker, or LXD more practical and resource-efficient. Red Hat OpenShift shines in complex, container-native workflows, but can be overkill for basic infrastructure needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    HCLSoftware
    • Ability to translate Multiple SQL queries into a very easy to use visual GUI.
    • Provides the ability to pre-define segments, run them once in off hours, store them in their own system tables for quick youth and a significant reduction in CPU utilization on the database.
    • It’s use of Reusable objects. Including user variables to pre-define calculations one time, macros that you can create and pass values to parameterize the SQL code And the creation of templates to easily replicate work.
    • It’s ability to bring in external data on the fly that can very easily be mapped into any flowchart.
    • It’s flexibility and creating UNIX script via triggers to automate sending of files to multiple vendors with different FTP sites
    • It’s flexibility in the output layouts that it can create.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kubernetes
    • Complex cluster management can be done with simple commands with strong authentication and authorization schemes
    • Exhaustive documentation and open community smoothens the learning process
    • As a user a few concepts like pod, deployment and service are sufficient to go a long way
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • We had a few microservices that dealt with notifications and alerts. We used OpenShift to deploy these microservices, which handle and deliver notifications using publish-subscribe models.
    • We had to expose an API to consumers via MTLS, which was implemented using Server secret integration in OpenShift. We were then able to deploy the APIs on OpenShift with API security.
    • We integrated Splunk with OpenShift to view the logs of our applications and gain real-time insights into usage, as well as provide high availability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    HCLSoftware
    • Greater integration of real time (Interact) capabilities with outbound channels, in particular IBM eMessage Email & SMS delivery.
    • Additional outbound channels to be integrated into eMessage, including Facebook Fanpage & Twitter DM broadcasts. At the moment these are possible only through custom additional integration.
    • Support for additional marketing database technology, e.g. MySQL, Exasol, ParAccel, WX2.
    • Provision of database technology with software purchase, as Web technology (IBM WebSphere Express) is supplied for free, but no database is supplied - since IBM also market DB2, which is a supported technology it seems a shame.
    Read full review
    Kubernetes
    • Local development, Kubernetes does tend to be a bit complicated and unnecessary in environments where all development is done locally.
    • The need for add-ons, Helm is almost required when running Kubernetes. This brings a whole new tool to manage and learn before a developer can really start to use Kubernetes effectively.
    • Finicy configmap schemes. Kubernetes configmaps often have environment breaking hangups. The fail safes surrounding configmaps are sadly lacking.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • I wouldn't necessarily say there is look everyday technology transform. I can see a trend wherein Red Hat OpenShift is adopting all the new technology trends and helping their customers align with their priorities and the emerging technology trends. I wouldn't call out various scope for development every day. There is scope for development. It is all how the organizations adopt it and how they deliver it to their customers. I don't want to call out there is scope for development. It's happening. It is a never ending process.
    • At the moment, I don't have anything to call out. We are experiencing Red Hat OpenShift and we can see every day they're coming up with new features as and when they come up with new features, we want to experience it more and more. We are looking for opportunities wherein this can be leveraged to help our users and partners.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    HCLSoftware
    There are three main factors to renew a licence: 1) Cost to migrate to another platform would be rather expensive and time consuming, plus the requirement of retraining employees to use a new tool 2) It has been proven time and time again that it is a market leader in the space (10 years +) 3) It can be built upon, with the addition of additional IBM EMM modules - despite theories it does have very strong digital capabilities.
    Read full review
    Kubernetes
    The Kubernetes is going to be highly likely renewed as the technologies that will be placed on top of it are long term as of planning. There shouldn't be any last minute changes in the adoption and I do not anticipate sudden change of the core underlying technology. It is just that the slow process of technology adoption that makes it hard to switch to something else.
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    This is the current strategy for the company, most of the products in the organisation are aligning to Openshift and various use cases it support. Also lot of applications are being developed for AI use case, openshift.AI provides opportunity to host and leverage the AI capabilities for these applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    HCLSoftware
    Unica provides functionality that is very simple and easy to use. For reporting, we can see Unica system tables. Contact history table, response history tables. We have all the information in one place. Performance-wise, Unica also handles large volumes of data and can run a 5-million-record campaign within minutes. This is something great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kubernetes
    It is an eminently usable platform. However, its popularity is overshadowed by its complexity. To properly leverage the capabilities and possibilities of Kubernetes as a platform, you need to have excellent understanding of your use case, even better understanding of whether you even need Kubernetes, and if yes - be ready to invest in good engineering support for the platform itself
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    As I said before, the obserability is one of the weakest point of OpenShift and that has a lot to do with usability. The Kibana console is not fully integrated with OpenShift console and you have to switch from tab to tab to use it. Same with Prometheus, Jaeger and Grafan, it's a "simple" integration but if you want to do complex queries or dashboards you have to go to the specific console
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    HCLSoftware
    No answers on this topic
    Kubernetes
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    Redhat openshift is generally reliable and available platform, it ensures high availability for most the situations. in fact the product where we put openshift in a box, we ensure that the availability is also happening at node and network level and also at storage level, so some of the factors that are outside of Openshift realm are also working in HA manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    HCLSoftware
    No answers on this topic
    Kubernetes
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    Overall, this platform is beneficial. The only downsides we have encountered have been with pods that occasionally hang. This results in resources being dedicated to dead or zombie pods. Over time, these wasted resources occasionally cause us issues, and we have had difficulty monitoring these pods. However, this issue does not overshadow the benefits we get from Openshift.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    HCLSoftware
    I didn't use the Unica support since it is with IBM, only before.
    Read full review
    Kubernetes
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    Their customer support team is good and quick to respond. On a couple of occassions, they have helped us in solving some issues which we were finding a tad difficult to comprehend. On a rare occasion, the response was a bit slow but maybe it was because of the festival season. Overall a good experience on this front.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    HCLSoftware
    No answers on this topic
    Kubernetes
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    I was not involved in the in person training, so i
    can not answer this question, but the team in my org worked directly
    with Openshift and able to get the in person training done easily, i did not
    hear problem or complain in this space, so i hope things happen
    seamlessly without any issue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    HCLSoftware
    No answers on this topic
    Kubernetes
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    We went thru the training material on RH webesite, i think its very descriptive and the handson lab sesssions are very useful. It would be good to create more short duration videos covering one single aspect of openshift, this wll keep the interest and also it breaks down the complexity to reasonable chunks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    HCLSoftware
    - We had to rebuild a part of the datamart afterwards to tighten up and simplify the selection process. But as it was too time consuming to rebuild all the existing campaigns, we no run campaigns on different versions of the datamart. - The response tracking of the campaigns never worked out well, it was impossible to implement a direct response where there is a link between the lead and the response in our operational process
    Read full review
    Kubernetes
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    HCLSoftware
    The contact history and the response history are so powerful. You can track whatever you want to help the call center to push relevant offers to our customer. In addition, predictive models can be built, with patience, in IBM Campaign. If you have some complaints from the call center about any campaigns, you can easily validate it into the contact or response history.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kubernetes
    Most of the required features for any orchestration tool or framework, which is provided by Kubernetes. After understanding all modules and features of the K8S, it is the best fit for us as compared with others out there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    The Tanzu Platform seemed overly complicated, and the frequent changes to the portfolio as well as the messaging made us uneasy. We also decided it would not be wise to tie our application platform to a specific infrastructure provider, as Tanzu cannot be deployed on anything other than vSphere. SUSE Rancher seemed good overall, but ultimately felt closer to a DIY approach versus the comprehensive package that Red Hat OpenShift provides.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    HCLSoftware
    No answers on this topic
    Kubernetes
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    It's easy to understand what are being billed and what's included in each type of subscription. Same with the support (Std or Premium) you know exactly what to expect when you need to use it. The "core" unit approach on the subscription made really simple to scale and carry the workloads from one site to another.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    HCLSoftware
    No answers on this topic
    Kubernetes
    No answers on this topic
    Red Hat
    This is a great platform to deployment container applications designed for multiple use cases. Its reasonably scalable platform, that can host multiple instances of applications, which can seamlessly handle the node and pod failure, if they are configured properly. There should be some scalability best practices guide would be very useful
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    HCLSoftware
    • It helps my clients drive their business which in turn, drives more profit for them.
    • It helps my clients determine what works, and what doesn't work, in terms of their social marketing campaigns.
    • It helps navigate proper budgeting through determining what clients' users respond to, and what they find unique.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kubernetes
    • Because of microservices, Kubernetes makes it easy to find the cost of each application easily.
    • Like every new technology, initially, it took more resources to educate ourselves but over a period of time, I believe it's going to be worth it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • That is a complicated question and one that's not easy for me to answer. There's a lot of factors that go into all of the stuff that we just don't have an easy way of measuring. And we realize that while we're implementing Red Hat OpenShift, we've tried to start measuring some of that stuff, but we don't have a baseline to go on. So it's hard to say. What I can tell you is general experience with the platform has been extremely positive from the development aspect. Teams have been very, very happy with the speed at which they're able to do stuff. They've been happy with that. The way it works in one environment is exactly the way it works in the next environment because we don't have configuration drift, that type of thing, and has had very positive impacts. But we didn't have a baseline to start with. So I can't talk about getting there faster or anything like that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    HCL Unica Screenshots

    Screenshot of HCL Unica Deliver is the email marketing and messaging execution module of the HCL Unica platform.

Its scalable digital messaging engine helps enterprise marketers design, personalize, and send high-volume, data-driven communications across multiple customer engagement channels.

It’s built for complex and compliant omni-channel campaigns with advanced segmentation, behavioral triggers, and real-time customer data.

Key channels supported include:
• Email — for personalized bulk and trigger-based mailings.
• SMS — send text messages to mobile subscribers.
• WhatsApp — conversational and promotional messaging.
• In-app and Push notifications — mobile push alerts via apps.