Hiver is a customer service platform that brings together communication channels, apps, and data to improve customer support operations. Hiver enables real-time collaboration across every customer communication channel, offering AI and automation to resolve issues and help teams work faster. Hiver states that over 10,000 teams of all shapes and sizes globally from Flexport to Harvard University, Vacasa, and Epic Games rely on Hiver to deliver support that wins and retains customers for…
$24
per month per user
Samepage
Score8 out of 10
N/A
Samepage is a collaboration solution focused on file management and communication. Its extensive list of third-party integrations include part of the Adobe Creative Cloud Suite, Google Maps and Drive, and Microsoft Office.
N/A
Pricing
Hiver
Samepage
Editions & Modules
Lite
$24
per month per user
Growth
$34
per month per user
Pro
$59
per month per user
Elite
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hiver
Samepage
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
20% discount for annual pricing.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Hiver
Samepage
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Hiver and Samepage
Feature
Hiver
9.0
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Samepage
-
Ratings
Organize and prioritize service tickets
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ticket response
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Hiver and Samepage
Feature
Hiver
8.0
1 Ratings
0% below category average
Samepage
-
Ratings
External knowledge base
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledge base
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Hiver and Samepage
Feature
Hiver
8.5
4 Ratings
6% above category average
Samepage
-
Ratings
Customer portal
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Hiver and Samepage
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Samepage
6.7
6 Ratings
14% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
4.06 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
5.04 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Hiver and Samepage
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Samepage
7.5
6 Ratings
6% below category average
Chat
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
3.02 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Hiver and Samepage
One scenario where Hiver works really well is in a shared support or billing inbox or anywhere multiple team members need access to the same messages. For example, when a customer emails about a billing question, we used to reply and manually loop in the billing team or forward the message. That often caused confusion, especially when someone forgot to “reply all” or responded only to the teammate instead of the customer.Now with Hiver, we just assign the conversation to the billing inbox, and whoever is available can respond. Everyone on the team can see the thread, status, and notes, which avoids duplicated efforts and missed replies. We also used to rely on Google Groups, but it wasn’t clear if someone had already replied, and there was no easy way to collaborate behind the scenes. Hiver completely solved that for us.As for situations where Hiver might be less ideal, I’d say if your team isn’t using Gmail or Google Workspace, then it’s probably not a good fit. It’s really designed for teams that live in Gmail so the team doesn't have to learn a new system. I'm sure some businesses will require a more robust ticketing solution but for our use case, this was a perfect option to improve outcomes, client service, and satisfaction.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Samepage is well suited to situations: - when there is a need for ongoing collaboration between people - when these people lack tech skills - when there is a need for sharing and showing different kinds of media Samepage is less appropriate in situations (since there are better tools for those particular uses): - requiring more robust communication tools - when the objective is to execute a specific, finite task - when it is necessary a precise control of version history
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Samepage support is incredibly active and responsive! They work with you from the outset to make sure you are set up for success and understand all the features
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
True ticketing solutions are certainly more robust in that you can typically manage social media channels and phones, etc. But, in my opinion, when you don't have a team solely responsible for managing a ticketing system they can be complicated to implement. With HIVER, we're already all accustomed to managing our own G-Suite inbox, so it was simply a matter of teaching the team how to utilize the solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have used many project management and collaboration tools and everyone has its kicks and fall backs. But for the kind of collaboration we require with our external parties right now, we really enjoy collaborating on Samepage. With Sharepoint, we were always running into access issues with our external vendors and it was a hassle to adjust those user settings. However since we started with Samepage, both our team members and external party vendor have been happily collaborating.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The ROI on showing how many emails are being received and addressed in a timely manner are great for KPIs
the ability to search and ensure emails are not being deleted as an automatic report is sent out the following day saying if any emails were deleted by whom
the ability to automate who gets assigned what emails from specific vendors per entity
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info