HxGN EAM vs. IFS Applications

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HxGN EAM
ScoreĀ 7.9Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
HxGN EAM (formerly Infor EAM) is a configurable enterprise asset management platform. The solution was acquired by Hexagon from Infor in late 2021.N/A
IFS Applications
ScoreĀ 6.0Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturingā€¦N/A
Pricing
HxGN EAMIFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HxGN EAMIFS Applications
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Detailsā€”ā€”
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HxGN EAMIFS Applications
Considered Both Products
HxGN EAM
Chose HxGN EAM
The ease of configuration, scalability, and built-in functionality were the main reasons for us to go with EAM.
IFS Applications

No answer on this topic

Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
HxGN EAMIFS Applications
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
151% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
2 Ratings
152% below category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.5
2 Ratings
39% below category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.3
2 Ratings
137% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings2.02 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.4
2 Ratings
17% below category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.3
2 Ratings
59% below category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
2 Ratings
154% below category average
Pricing00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
152% below category average
Billing Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
149% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.2
1 Ratings
141% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
147% below category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.0
1 Ratings
31% below category average
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
Production Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.0
1 Ratings
37% below category average
Forecasting00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HxGN EAMIFS Applications
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Acumatica
Acumatica
ScoreĀ 8.8Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Medium-sized Companies
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Qualys TruRisk Platform
ScoreĀ 8.3Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
ScoreĀ 7.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Enterprises
Qualys TruRisk Platform
Qualys TruRisk Platform
ScoreĀ 8.3Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
ScoreĀ 7.4Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HxGN EAMIFS Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(5 ratings)
2.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
HxGN EAMIFS Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
Hexagon AB
EAM is a very capable application without necessarily making it a complex tool to use. The nice thing with EAM is that, thanks to its configuration capabilities, it can be implemented in a multi-stage manner where users can start simple and then later (and over time) expand the usage as they learn or better understand its full potential.
Read full review
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
Pros
Hexagon AB
  • Real-time reporting; this was an improvement on the stand-along Microsoft Excel-based reports
  • Integrates with Oracle; linking to an enterprise system help to link with the ledger
  • Generally user friendly; the user interface and navigation is relatively intuitive to use
Read full review
IFS
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Complex Inventory
Read full review
Cons
Hexagon AB
  • The update schedule takes some getting used to
  • Possible to accidentally lock yourself out of your own account (if admin)
Read full review
IFS
  • The speed of bug fixes should be improved by the IFS after sales teams. We saw the difference of responsiveness prior to Go Live and after Go Live, with a change of teams. IFS France is working on that point, and strategically wants to innovate by acting now with two other third-party companies in early 2017, to improve the after sales experience for customers.
  • There is no license model between the full licenses, which gives access to all IFS features, and the light licenses, to get access to a specific module like expense sheet. As a consequence, you must acquire a full access license for one team working only with a dedicated module (e.g. general ledger). Maybe an intermediate type license would be welcome to balance the budget. IFS tries to make prices competitive but you have to consider full upgrades of the product too, where requiring full licenses can be hard on the budget.
  • When you have an Active Directory ecosystem with a trust relationship, users from domain B can't natively access IFS, even if AD sync is in place with domain A. It's important to improve that functionality because many companies have a merge and acquisition context, with SOX constraints sometimes, and avoiding maintaining contacts or local accounts simplifies SOX compliance, or to management of accounts within the company.
Read full review
Usability
Hexagon AB
EAM is overall simple to use, especially since the UI and individual forms can be configured per user group with simple clicks by a system administrator.
Read full review
IFS
The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
Read full review
Support Rating
Hexagon AB
The user support is better than average when comparing it to other software vendors we use. Normally they reply very quickly, but there is also a tendency to even reply too fast without fully analyzing or understanding the whole underlying problem. However, when we ask support to escalate something to the development team, this is done quickly as well.
Read full review
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hexagon AB
HxGN EAM is relatively comparable. Much of the software solutions for large enterprise businesses offer relatively comparable features and functionality. For example, integration with our organization's asset management strategy. The set-up of the asset management is organization-specific depending on the type of assets. At our organization, it was primarily equipment and buildings. HxGN EAM stacked up well against the other major solutions such as SAP EAM, IBM Maximo, etc. It may be best to include it as part of the options assessed for a solution to consider.
Read full review
IFS
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartnerā€™s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hexagon AB
  • Infor EAM works as well as the data contained. Management has to be dedicated to a change in culture and everyone must buy into this.
  • Infor EAM is very useful in exposing shoddy maintenance practices, or poor reaction to required maintenance. A company cannot be afraid to let the system work for them, and take the necessary actions to improve maintenance practices to prolong the life of their investments.
  • The only negative, is as mentioned above, Infor has the capabilities with KPIs and custom reports to easily identify unacceptable maintenance practices.
Read full review
IFS
  • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
  • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
  • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of