Alfresco vs. zeroheight

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Alfresco
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
The Alfresco platform, from Hyland, delivers comprehensive cloud-native content services. It is used to intelligently activate processes and content to accelerate the flow of business.N/A
zeroheight
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
zeroheight helps teams create, manage and maintain their design systems. Using zeroheight, designers, engineers, and product teams can collaborate and build design systems that can be easily shared across teams.
$49
month
Pricing
Alfrescozeroheight
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$49
month
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Alfrescozeroheight
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Alfrescozeroheight
Features
Alfrescozeroheight
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Alfresco
8.2
7 Ratings
1% above category average
zeroheight
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management8.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Alfrescozeroheight
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.4 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.4 out of 10
Tungsten Capture
Tungsten Capture
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Alfrescozeroheight
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(17 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.9
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Alfrescozeroheight
Likelihood to Recommend
Hyland
Easy integration with the external APIs Workflows can be invoked via REST call Wonderful swagger documentation for process REST APIs REST, MULE, CAMEL, Google Drive, and Box features are available with Alfresco Process Services The micro-service version deployment should be well documented and needs improvement
Read full review
zeroheight
For creating and maintaining a component library, it is a fantastic tool that creates an interface between Developers, UX Engineers and Designers. It is easy to get both general information about a component, but also incredibly detailed information when looking at the component on a pixel-level, where information on paddings, margins, colors, fonts etc. can be easily accessed.
Read full review
Pros
Hyland
  • Basic workflows are easy enough for casual users to set up and utilize.
  • Cloud sync capability provides a great way to share documents with third parties and to use as a backup system for critical documents.
  • Alfresco mobile app makes it easy for those on the road to access, approve and share documents.
  • Folder rules are easy to set up and make assignment of metadata easier to automate.
Read full review
zeroheight
  • showcasing components and other topics
  • ease of seeing detailed information on components (colors, paddings, sizes etc.)
  • ease of finding information
  • possibility of going to previous versions of the design guideline
Read full review
Cons
Hyland
  • Alfresco Process Services and Alfresco Application Development Framework integration makes for best functionality/application of ECM.
  • Use case alignment - Marketing content and documentation of specific business requirements and user stories being available as reference material/documentation.
  • Integration with multiple silos for content.
Read full review
zeroheight
  • when opening a component image (which opens a new page where the detailed information like paddings and colors are shown), the zoom can only be done by buttons, I'd prefer to be able to use my mouse scroll and for vertical / horizontal scrolling to do ctrl+scroll or ctrl+shift+scroll or something like that
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Hyland
As per the current market and the line of products that are available for content and document management system, Alfresco is a very good option compared to other systems in terms of features and cost. Plus the community support is great. Also since the product is open source, it can be extended or understood in a better way.
Read full review
zeroheight
No answers on this topic
Usability
Hyland
The UI is very intuitive, most of our users figure out how to use the platform by themselves, so there's not much training needed.
You can upload files by using the web drag and drop, WebDAV, FTP, and more.
Most of the platform already works as-is so you can just deploy it using Docker and it's mostly ready to go.
Read full review
zeroheight
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Hyland
I am not big fan of Alfresco Content Services' support; it works on its own speed and sometimes it becomes challenging to achieve business needs. However, I appreciate regular delivery of security patches and updates
Read full review
zeroheight
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Hyland
Process was relatively smooth and overall, downtime minimal. MSI was very responsive to our needs and made the transition easier than it otherwise might have been.
Read full review
zeroheight
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Hyland
All software has some pros and some cons. Alfresco has some good pluses, and suits our environment very well. It fit perfectly in the place that we are working on. That is why we decided to go with this software. Overall, the kind of content management that needs to be done in an organization is what would determine which software to use.
Read full review
zeroheight
I have used and still use Sketch and Zeplin too, but they serve other purposes for us. Sketch is used to design the components themselves and they are then exported to Zeroheight where they are showcased and enriched with textual information. Zeplin is used to design application pages, and again the components are exported to Zeplin from Sketch. But Zeroheight is mainly used for the development of the components themselves as well as a documentation for our design guideline in general. It is also used by us for design tokens and patterns, as well as other information on the design guideline, so if someone wants to understand the "why" of a design decision, the explanation can be usually found in Zeroheight too.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hyland
  • Instant document lookup - No paper files to mail which saves in all areas of postage, truck delivery, physical storage warehouse space, printing, etc
  • No longer losing important documents - Previously with paper files things would go missing and those could be costly reports/assessments.
  • Ability to secure documents and provide access to only those who should be allowed to see that content
Read full review
zeroheight
  • increased quality, as less misunderstandings or communication problems occur
  • increased speed of development, as it is a single source of truth for us. The developer can rely on the information in Zeroheight being correct so that he doesn't have to iterate his code again and again.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Alfresco Screenshots

Screenshot of Alfresco Control CenterScreenshot of Alfresco