IBM SevOne vs. Logz.io
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM SevOne | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM SevOne’s app-centric, hybrid network observability empowers NetOps teams with ML-driven insights, enabling proactive issue prevention and resolution. With a single source of truth for network performance, it delivers visibility to optimize operations and support agility in complex, multi-cloud environments. | N/A |
Logz.io | Score8.3 out of 10 | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | Logz.io in Boston offers their enterprise-grade log analytics application, oriented towards providing data security and eliminating the need for capacity management. | $0.84 per ingested GB 3 day of log retention |
| IBM SevOne | Logz.io | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | IBM® SevOne® uses Managed Device (MD) and Managed Client Device (MCD) as pricing metrics. These can be mapped to managed devices for physical, virtualized and containerized functions in the managed environment. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM SevOne | Logz.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 15 Answers | 67% Would buy again 4 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 15 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
91% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| IBM SevOne | Logz.io | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Performance Monitoring |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM SevOne | Logz.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Auvik Score8.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | PingPlotter Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Nmap Score8.7 out of 10 | NetBrain Technologies Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM SevOne | Logz.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.7 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Availability | - | 9.0 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.1 |
| Configurability | - | 9.0 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 9.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.0 |
| Professional Services | - | 9.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 9.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 9.0 |
| IBM SevOne | Logz.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM SevOne Screenshots |









