TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM SPSS Statistics vs. IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM SPSS Statistics

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ASPSS Statistics is a software package used for statistical analysis. It is now officially named "IBM SPSS Statistics". Companion products in the same family are used for survey authoring and deployment (IBM SPSS Data Collection), data mining (IBM SPSS Modeler), text analytics, and collaboration and deployment (batch and automated scoring services).

    $105

    per month per user

    IBM Watson Studio

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AIBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIBM Watson Studio
    Editions & Modules
    Base
    USD 3,830
    one-time fee per user
    Standard
    USD 8,440
    one-time fee per user
    Professional
    USD 16,900
    one-time fee per user
    Premium
    USD 25,200
    one-time fee per user
    Monthly subscription
    USD 105
    per month per user
    Annual subscription
    USD 1,188.00
    per year per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIBM Watson Studio
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIBM Watson Studio
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    I am excited with the roadmap of Watson Studio incorporating SPSS Modeler in the offerings.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    Watson Studio offers more capabilities and diversity in tools and services.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    The learning curve for DSX is smaller compared to other tools. The data science user base often has preferred tools that they have used previously which are often not DSX which makes adoption of DSX by trained data scientists harder than new users.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    DSx stands out in that deployment can be done easily through Watson ML whereas for other technologies separate paradigms are needed.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    Is more complementary, we can have just one platform, due to we need to cover the analytics cycle. Just one platform couldn’t cover all the users profile.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    SPSS - Totally different approaches, SPSS UI is now a well-known name with a well-established user base who we consider aren´t going anywhere but Statistics.

    Modeler - A proven analytical solution with capabilities to deal with huge datasets, scalability offers you now the …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Watson Studio
    The mix of proprietary and open-source benefits that DSx offers gives me more flexibility than any other options I have encountered. I have the custom program building capability of Anaconda with the built-in predictive models of SPSS Modeler. I have more visualization …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    94%
    Would buy again
    49 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    42 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    51 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    34 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    35 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIBM Watson Studio
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of IBM SPSS Statistics and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    IBM SPSS Statistics
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    8.1
    22 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    MDM Integration00 Ratings6.414 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of IBM SPSS Statistics and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    IBM SPSS Statistics
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    10.0
    22 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Visualization00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of IBM SPSS Statistics and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    IBM SPSS Statistics
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    9.5
    22 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Data Transformations00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Data Encryption00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Built-in Processors00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of IBM SPSS Statistics and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    IBM SPSS Statistics
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    9.5
    22 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of IBM SPSS Statistics and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    IBM SPSS Statistics
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    8.0
    22 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings9.022 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings7.022 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIBM Watson Studio
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Alteryx Platform
    Score9 out of 10
    Anaconda
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Alteryx Platform
    Score9 out of 10
    Posit
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIBM Watson Studio
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (116 ratings)
    8.0
    (65 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.5
    (23 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (15 ratings)
    9.6
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.4
    (12 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.7
    (7 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIBM Watson Studio
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM SPSS Statistics is well suited for pretty much any data analytic scenario. It can handle extremely complex and large-scale datasets with ease. It especially shines if you have to do any kind of analyses that involve significance testing. Being able to do any number of significance tests (i.e., t-tests, chi-square, ANOVAs, etc.) right inside the tool is very valuable. The only scenario I would say it is less appropriate is if you need to work on a very small dataset and answer very simple questions, like frequencies or averages. In those cases, something like Excel could probably do the job just as easily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • SPSS has been around for quite a while and has amassed a large suite of functionality. One of its longest-running features is the ability to automate SPSS via scripting, AKA "syntax." There is a very large community of practice on the internet who can help newbies to quickly scale up their automation abilities with SPSS. And SPSS allows users to save syntax scripting directly from GUI wizards and configuration windows, which can be a real life-saver if one is not an experienced coder.
    • Many statistics package users are doing scientific research with an eye to publish reproducible results. SPSS allows you to save datasets and syntax scripting in a common format, facilitating attempts by peer reviewers and other researchers to quickly and easily attempt to reproduce your results. It's very portable!
    • SPSS has both legacy and modern visualization suites baked into the base software, giving users an easily mountable learning curve when it comes to outputting charts and graphs. It's very easy to start with a canned look and feel of an exported chart, and then you can tweak a saved copy to change just about everything, from colors, legends, and axis scaling, to orientation, labels, and grid lines. And when you've got a chart or graph set up the way you like, you can export it as an image file, or create a template syntax to apply to new visualizations going forward.
    • SPSS makes it easy for even beginner-level users to create statistical coding fields to support multidimensional analysis, ensuring that you never need to destructively modify your dataset.
    • In closing, SPSS's long and successful tenure ensures that just about any question a new user may have about it can be answered with a modicum of Google-fu. There are even several fully-fledged tutorial websites out there for newbie perusal.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
    • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
    • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
    • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Cost is becoming prohibitive.
    • Availability of procedures in the base package seems to be dwindling.
    • The copy-and-paste function from output to Excel is not as easy as it once was (now I have to do a "paste special").
    • Text and date handling are terrible.
    • Need to include AI-based NLP for survey verbatims and other text-based fields. This is becoming increasingly important in the CX world, yet SPSS seems to be ignoring it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
    • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
    • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    Both
    money and time are essential for success in terms of return on investment for any kind of research based project work. Using a Likert-scale questionnaire is very easy for data entry and analysis
    using IBM SPSS. With the help of IBM SPSS, I found very fast and reliable data
    entry and data analysis for my research. Output from SPSS is very easy to
    interpret for data analysis and findings
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    Probably because I have been using it for so long that I have used all of the modules, or at least almost all of the modules, and the way SPSS works is second nature to me, like fish to swimming.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    SPSS can tend to crash when I am trying to do a lot of data. This can slow me down when I need to do a lot of data
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    SPSS does the job, but it can be slow. I do have to plan a lot of time to get through a huge amount of data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Never had slow response even on our very busy network
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    I have not contacted IBM SPSS for support myself. However, our IT staff has for trying to get SPSS Text Analytics Module to work. The issue was never resolved, but I'm not sure if it was on the IT's end or on SPSS's end
    Read full review
    IBM
    I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    Have a plan for managing the yearly upgrade cycle. Most users work in the desktop version, so there needs to be a mechanism for either pushing out new versions of the software or a key manager to deal with updated licensing keys. If you have a lot of users this needs to be planned for in advance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    If you have made it this far, you should have a very good idea of how SPSS stacks up the competition (data processing and analytics tools). Even the free ones, such as r Studio or Stata, are leaps and bounds ahead of SPSS. IBM is resting on a reputation developed nearly 30 years ago and has shown no desire to improve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    I am neutral because I have not had to look into scalability since I am using as a student.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • I found SPSS easier to use than SAS as it's more intuitive to me.
    • The learning curve to use SPSS is less compared to SAS.
    • I used SAS, to a much lesser extent than SPSS. However, it seems that SAS may be more suitable for users who understand programming. With SPSS, users can perform many statistical tests without the need to know programming.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
    • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
    • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM SPSS Statistics Screenshots

    Screenshot of SPSS Statistics Forecasting. This enables users to build time-series forecasts regardless of their skill level.Screenshot of SPSS Statistics Regression. These predict categorical outcomes and apply nonlinear regression procedures.Screenshot of IBM SPSS Statistics Neural Networks. These can discover complex relationships and improve predictive models.Screenshot of IBM SPSS Statistics Curated Help. These can interpret correlation output.Screenshot of IBM SPSS Statistics AI Output Assistant interprets statistical output in easy to consume language