IBM Storage FlashSystem vs. NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Storage FlashSystem
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Storage FlashSystem, an all-flash storage array, delivers ~2 PB of effective capacity per single rack unit. Engineered with unique FlashCore Modules, it offloads data services including compression, encryption, deduplication, and ransomware threat detection ensuring optimum performance and resiliency.N/A
NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
NetApp's ONTAP Data Management Software is a storage and data management and protection solution. ONTAP 9 allows users to build an intelligent hybrid cloud that is the foundation of a NetApp Data Fabric that spans flash, disk, and cloud. Flexibly deploy storage on a choice of architectures—hardware storage systems, software-defined storage (SDS), and the cloud—while unifying data management across all of them.N/A
Pricing
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
Considered Both Products
IBM Storage FlashSystem
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
IBM Storage FlashSystem provides highly dense, secure, and ultra-fast data storage. It excels at protecting data with built-in ransomware detection and saving space through hardware compression. It gives your business a powerful, cost-saving edge in your data center. IBM …
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
With respect to large-scale and enterprise-level solutions, IBM is somewhat better than other partners.
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
IBM Storage FlashSystem provides highly dense, secure, and ultra-fast data storage. It excels at protecting data with built-in ransomware detection and saving space through hardware compression. It gives your business a powerful, cost-saving edge in your data center. IBM …
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
EMC’s equivalent storage devices. This had a better, easier user interface—easier to manage and overall easier to implement.
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
Compared to the other solutions we evaluated, IBM Storage FlashSystem stood out for its balance of performance, simplicity, and cost efficiency. HPE 3PAR had solid reliability, but it required more administrative effort to scale. NetApp AFF had good integration features, yet …
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
Its scalability and performance attracted me towards it and AI tools I love the most.
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
IBM Storage FlashSystem beat them in price
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
IBM Spectrum Control, IBM Spectrum Virtualize, IBM DS8880F, StarWind Virtual Tape Library and HPE Alletra
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
I'm an IBM Storage FlashSystem certified technician.
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
Son módulos que complementan de manre muy grandiosa a un equipo flash como para inmutabilidad etc.
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
Price and performance
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
Dell Unity XT Unified Storage
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
Like I already commented before. IBM Storage FlashSystems are more reliable, much easier to setup and operate and available at a much better price point as the competitor. So our experience is that the competition is going to "no bid" if IBM Storage FlashSystems are entering …
Chose IBM Storage FlashSystem
I use IBM Storage FlashSystem since the begining. In fact since SVC in 2003. So it is interesting to see the evolution.
NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
Chose NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
I only briefly and minimally used EMC's management tools. I found them outdated and clunky by comparison to NetApp's.
Chose NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
I have not been able to use similar platform though in service delivery and functionality capacity this is the most effective tool in our company. The entire organization data and workloads are always under secure environment when managed by this great platform. It has enabled …
Chose NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
I have only used NetApp ONTAP Select platform in our organization in data storage and file management. It has efficiently managed all data-related problems and gives us the right roadmap of managing data from all sources effectively. Data migration from our company to the …
Chose NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
For me, this system has negated the need for a file server so I have been able to remove any Windows servers that were used exclusively for file storage / shares. It reduces the complexity and additional layers needed to get to my files. It has more features and capabilities …
Chose NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
I've used NetApp systems for the last 12 years. The only alternative I have used is the old OnCommand system. This is a drastic improvement over what was available in the past. The ability to use this software from anywhere inside your network is huge. If you were to combine …
Features
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
Enterprise Flash Array Storage
Comparison of Enterprise Flash Array Storage features of Product A and Product B
IBM Storage FlashSystem
8.1
Ratings
9% below category average
NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
-
Ratings
Flash Array Performance9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Flash Array Integration8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Compression7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Non-Intrusive Upgrades9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Simplicity8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Power Savings6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Cyberduck
Cyberduck
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Everpure FlashArray
Everpure FlashArray
Score 8.3 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Dell VMAX
Dell VMAX
Score 9.7 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
Likelihood to Recommend
Top choice for IBMi integration. In general, it's a very good solution for quite a lot of customers. If you need a 3 site replication solution (HA + DR) maybe it's not the best solution, unless you use SVC. FlashCore Modules have very powerful compression rate, while mantaining good performance: high IOPS rate and really low latency
Read full review
NetApp ONTAP Data Management is a must platform to most businesses around the globe since the tool generates various capabilities for the user to easily and very securely manage all the project data through the cloud services using the platform capabilities. The data analytics are generated in real-time and easy visualization of different data which the tool helps the user import across other platforms.
Read full review
Pros
  • Cyber resilience with the new functionality of immutable copies called sfaguarded copies
  • With the IBM FlashCore modules it allows us to have good levels of online compression of the information, besides that it is a hardware compression that would not affect the performance of the equipment
  • the virtualization of other storages that can be IBM or other brands
  • binary replication works great
Read full review
  • Offsite replication is seamless.
  • Snapshots are easy to implement.
  • System Manager is easy to learn and manage the entire system.
  • System Manager is feature rich.
Read full review
Cons
  • The flexiblity of upgrading the flash modules for a higher capcity needs to be allowed
  • The user interface for the management console is sometimes a bit confusing
  • the configuration of call home can only be done to a specific IP address but not a dns name
Read full review
  • Not necessarily a dislike of OnCommand per se but I do dislike that you have to still use different flavors of this tool to get a holistic view of every aspect of your NetApp - System Manager, Performance Manager, Unified Manager etc
  • The initial process to connect to a filer probably could do with a little more friendly documentation as the format for filer name (or IP) and whether and SNMP string is required etc is not clear.
  • The ability for more complete search capability within the logs (so therefore not having to extract them to work with them) would be an advantage for the timely resolution of faults.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We’re unlikely to renew our use of IBM Storage FlashSystem, not because of any shortcomings with the product itself, but simply because it serves a very specific role in our environment, supporting our SAP landscape. For other workloads and broader storage needs, we rely on different platforms that are a better fit for those use cases.
The FlashSystem has performed reliably in its role, but since our future storage strategy involves consolidating platforms and aligning with solutions that cover a wider range of requirements, we don’t plan to renew it as part of that transition.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM Storage FlashSystem currently is and will remain part of our infrastructure, which we are transforming from a most classical data center based implementation to a cloud-native version which enables us to act as one of the most relevant cloud service provider when it comes to the german health insurance market. IBM Storage FlashSystem help to transform and grow.
Read full review
Functionality is very impressive, practical, and useful. GUI could use several improvements.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Yes. The last really issues I've seen in the environments of my customers were back in the "Storwize" era of systems. Issues with code updates or sometimes rarely failing critical components. BUT: since every component is at least dual redundant even back in that day real outages were very rare. And today in the "FlashSystem Era" the systems are so reliable and available even during code updates there are no complaints. I think the 5 or 6 9s are completely achieved.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Latency and throughput have been excellent. The compression is done natively on the NVME modules so we do not see an impact there. the distributed parity does not seem to impact write speeds at all. We have found database performace has increased quite a bit over our old hybrid storage solution.
Having a single tier of performance makes it easy to set up SLAs for workloads.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Sometimes the knowledge of the support agent is quite limited and the support always has to route through the level 1 agent to screen all the informtion provided. Then its esclated to the next level support with the all collected data . The logs are always uploaded along wiht the case but still its reviewed at the lower level and then escalated / handed over to the next level if its complex issue to solve.
Read full review
Support is great. Our account managers and system engineers regularly contact us and check in on us. Provide free training on various topics. Our team is readily available to answer any questions. Support tickets are generated automatically if anything goes wrong such as a disk going bad and a new one is sent out immediately. Very happy with support.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Very good traning by experienced personnel. I attend instructor led sessions on IBM TechExchange and STUs before as well as IBM workshops for FlashSystems at IBM Böblingen which I helped to prepare and improve after piloting them. Absolutely nothing to complain about FlashSystem training in Germany or USA. So: all good here!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The online training especially for badges and certs is very good but not perfect. Because you can't ask the instructor questions during the video trainings. The remote sessions are good and the teachers are very happy to help. But for some cases there are no instructor led labs available, therefore the 9 out of 10.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I was amazed by the way IBM Flash storage provides a huge amount of storage within the limited footprint, it helped us to replace big fat storage arrays, which aided in the process of moving towards lower hardware, carbon, and energy consumption footprint. We can comfortably say that Flash helped us to host applications fast with a blazing speed and user transactions are quite quick.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM Storage FlashSystem is MUCH faster than the options listed above. We were able to remove 12U of Dell equipment and relaced it with a 2U IBM Storage FlashSystem that was faster and had more storage available. The setup was extremely easier than our initial deployment of our Dell systems. Previous to deploying IBM Storage FlashSystem in our environment, we had quite a bit of lag in our user's VDIs leading to a lot of negative feedback on our systems. Since implementing IBM Storage FlashSystem, we've had tons of positive remarks and the number of helpdesk tickets our internal team has received have dropped considerably. We're spending more time on other initiatives with all the extra time we're saving.
Read full review
I have not been able to use similar platform though in service delivery and functionality capacity this is the most effective tool in our company. The entire organization data and workloads are always under secure environment when managed by this great platform. It has enabled us to meet our objectives and speed up operations across in all departments. Data in both cloud and on premise is automatically connected to provide multiple services and bring efficiency.
Read full review
Scalability
I'm using cognos - especially cognos reports - as a part of IBMs Storage Intelligence software to manage datacenters and report storage and overall resource consumption to my customers. The software is reliable and - my customers who are using cognos in their businesses - say that they are very satisfied about the scalability of cognos. I can give it only an 8 rating because of the quite heavy resource footprint...
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • 2:1 Data Reduction
  • 6:1 Total Savings
  • Time savings from 48 hours for SAP refreshes to minutes
  • Time savings from days for provisioning to minutes using Ansible and PowerVC
  • Uptime has gone from 2-3 outages a year to 1(These are known and unknown bugs)
Read full review
  • It has saved a lot of resources contributing to positive returns on investments
  • Our data is always secure under this platform
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Storage FlashSystem Screenshots

Screenshot of Flash Core Module 5th GenScreenshot of IBM FlashSystem 5600Screenshot of IBM FlashSystem 5600 (rear)Screenshot of IBM FlashSystem 7600 and 9600Screenshot of IBM FlashSystem 7600 and 9600 (rear)