IBM Storage FlashSystem vs. NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software vs. Netvault Backup

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Storage FlashSystem
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Storage FlashSystem, an all-flash storage array, delivers ~2 PB of effective capacity per single rack unit. Engineered with unique FlashCore Modules, it offloads data services including compression, encryption, deduplication, and ransomware threat detection ensuring optimum performance and resiliency.
$14,200
NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
NetApp's ONTAP Data Management Software is a storage and data management and protection solution. ONTAP 9 allows users to build an intelligent hybrid cloud that is the foundation of a NetApp Data Fabric that spans flash, disk, and cloud. Flexibly deploy storage on a choice of architectures—hardware storage systems, software-defined storage (SDS), and the cloud—while unifying data management across all of them.N/A
Netvault Backup
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Netvault Backup is backup and recovery software from Dell, based on technology obtained via that company's acquisition of BakBone Software in 2011.N/A
Pricing
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management SoftwareNetvault Backup
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management SoftwareNetvault Backup
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEntry-Level IBM Storage FlashSystem: For any organization looking for an all-flash array with features that are both enterprise conducive and budget friendly, the small to entry level offering prices from IBM begin at $18,400. Mid-Range IBM Storage FlashSystem: For businesses wanting to take advantage of an enterprise-quality flash array for critical workloads (such as SQL databases, SAP, ERP, CRM, etc.), list prices start at $104,600. High-Performance IBM Storage FlashSystem: Organizations seeking a storage array with the ability to run multiple instances of critical applications that are both performance intensive and capacity sensitive, can find IBM prices starting at $368,500. Contact IBM for configuration and pricing details.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management SoftwareNetvault Backup
Features
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management SoftwareNetvault Backup
Enterprise Flash Array Storage
Comparison of Enterprise Flash Array Storage features of Product A and Product B
IBM Storage FlashSystem
8.8
152 Ratings
1% below category average
NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
-
Ratings
Netvault Backup
-
Ratings
Flash Array Performance9.4148 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Flash Array Integration8.3144 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Compression8.5147 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Non-Intrusive Upgrades9.6140 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Simplicity8.4149 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Power Savings8.7142 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
IBM Storage FlashSystem
-
Ratings
NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software
-
Ratings
Netvault Backup
8.2
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Universal recovery00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Instant recovery00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Recovery verification00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Business application protection00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Backup to the cloud00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Management dashboard00 Ratings00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Platform support00 Ratings00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Retention options00 Ratings00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management SoftwareNetvault Backup
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Cyberduck
Cyberduck
Score 9.7 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Everpure FlashArray
Everpure FlashArray
Score 8.2 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.3 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Dell VMAX
Dell VMAX
Score 9.7 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.3 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management SoftwareNetvault Backup
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(150 ratings)
9.9
(8 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.6
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.9
(22 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.4
(21 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(5 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.9
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
5.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Storage FlashSystemNetApp ONTAP Data Management SoftwareNetvault Backup
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Top choice for IBMi integration. In general, it's a very good solution for quite a lot of customers. If you need a 3 site replication solution (HA + DR) maybe it's not the best solution, unless you use SVC. FlashCore Modules have very powerful compression rate, while mantaining good performance: high IOPS rate and really low latency
Read full review
NetApp
I have highly benefited from the performance of this great tool. Storage and data management programs have been running as planned since we deployed this system. Under NetApp ONTAP Data Management Software our data and customers contacts are always secure. It has helped our company in reducing storage costs as we can safely use cloud storage services. It gives us continuity guarantee even after our systems fail to function due to strong backup system.
Read full review
Quest Software
If you are using NV for backups and restores, it does the job very well. You can rely on the functions and time it as you prefer it to be executed. They have a great plug-in library which provides integrations of many applications and many databases. The updated versions support better job creations and restorations. You can easily depend on your backups without a hassle. However if you go ahead with its advanced features, you many need further support. Would not recommend using the Cleaning Tape module.There are issues in the reports provided. Also you may face with disk latency issues.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Extremely fast storage
  • Scales up as needed. Add flash core modules easily and increase volumes very quickly.
  • Applying firmware updates to IBM Storage FlashSystem is very easy to do and can be done without any downtime.
  • Replication policies are very versatile and also easy to setup.
Read full review
NetApp
  • Cloud tool for easy multiple data management.
  • Creating reports is incredible through the package.
  • Data transportation and the real-time data analytics, this tool is the best ever.
  • Data threats Protection capability is amazing.
Read full review
Quest Software
  • Rapid recovery helping in data protection.
  • Daily backup of entire physical and storage environments.
  • Supported on Windows, Linux, VMware, Unix and HyperV platforms.
  • Backup different file servers on SQL
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Definitely we need to be able to extend a volume that is part of a mirror pair or Policy-Based Replication(PBO) on the fly.
  • Expansion of mirrored volumes/volume groups should resynchronise only the changed data (Almost like making use of change-volumes) and not trigger a full resync.
  • Please allow us to select downloading drive microcode also from Fix Central directly onto the flashsystem like with updates.
Read full review
NetApp
  • More details on network interfaces are available in CLI. Would like to see similar visibility on the GUI.
  • Deleting volumes that have been snapmirrored have to be released at the snapmirror destination first. Would be nice to have that feature at the source where you are deleting the volume.
  • When creating a volume in the GUI it adds to the default junction point. Would be nice to choose the junction point as you were creating the volume (this is a feature available in the CLI).
Read full review
Quest Software
  • Smartdisk disconnect oftenly.
  • Web interface can be improved as it is clunky and looks outdated.
  • User guides and support services need to be improved.
  • Limited with VMWare plugin.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
As flash technology evolves rapidly, vendors should [adapt] to the changes and onboard them in their products. IBM is a bit slow in adopting advanced technology in [its] portfolio. Even though the current product is good, my decision is purely based on how the transformation of the product [is] being produced and supplied to [the] end-user.
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
The integration into our SVC and the midrange systems are very well working. We do use cross site replication and global mirror which in turn is easy setup and the consistency groups are well maintained. The storage does global mirroring but also internal cross room replication as well. The integration of cloud object storage also helps in tiering the overall system.
Read full review
NetApp
Functionality is very impressive, practical, and useful. GUI could use several improvements.
Read full review
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
IBM
IBM Flashsystems is always available for me, it is fiberchannel storage without the fuzz of what iscsi brings. It is a very reliable storage system, I have almost never issues with this system. The only things which go wrong are the updates because the old updates which have been staged on the disks are not properly cleaned in my opinion.
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
Latency and throughput have been excellent. The compression is done natively on the NVME modules so we do not see an impact there. the distributed parity does not seem to impact write speeds at all. We have found database performace has increased quite a bit over our old hybrid storage solution.
Having a single tier of performance makes it easy to set up SLAs for workloads.
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
Sometimes the knowledge of the support agent is quite limited and the support always has to route through the level 1 agent to screen all the informtion provided. Then its esclated to the next level support with the all collected data . The logs are always uploaded along wiht the case but still its reviewed at the lower level and then escalated / handed over to the next level if its complex issue to solve.
Read full review
NetApp
NetApp support is always second to none. That being said I have never once had to contact support for the NetApp System Manager software. It is simple, stable and easy to use. Given that their support is stellar in all other areas I don't see how this would be any different
Read full review
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Online Training
IBM
THe training is often selfpaced and easy to follow if you have worked previously with other storage products. The content is clear and contains all the information needed for an admin to learn. However the troubleshooting part is not always included and this is dependent on forums or other sources where the information is not accessible very easily.
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
I was amazed by the way IBM Flash storage provides a huge amount of storage within the limited footprint, it helped us to replace big fat storage arrays, which aided in the process of moving towards lower hardware, carbon, and energy consumption footprint. We can comfortably say that Flash helped us to host applications fast with a blazing speed and user transactions are quite quick.
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
For the past six months, we have been utilizing this technology in our projects to manage a massive workload and produce swift business outcomes on a crucial production database. The IBM FlashSystem 7200, which offers high performance and compression, has so far been a great experience for us. The results and functionality of this product have delighted our consumers.
Read full review
NetApp
I have only used NetApp ONTAP Select platform in our organization in data storage and file management. It has efficiently managed all data-related problems and gives us the right roadmap of managing data from all sources effectively. Data migration from our company to the cloud storage datasets has been easy and secure. It provides reliable intelligence from all information gathered from our data sources that enhances better operations and smart decisions.
Read full review
Quest Software
Pricing was on point with our requirement. A great deal compared to the other products we evaluated. We had recommendations from existing users in the region. Since our requirement was basic backups and restores and NV provided that, we were compelled to go with it as the implementation was very very easy.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
We have been able to scale this storage system whenever there has been requirement for additional capacity and performance. with the help of deduplication we have been able to build quite a robust environment.
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • the compression in line means the IBM flashcore allow us to store much more information with less capacity, we can store much more with fewer disks
  • virtualization allows us to extend the useful life of old equipment that we already had separated, as I said, I use them as a repository for backups
  • With the implementation of the new functionality of immutable copies with SafeGuarded Copies, the information is much more secure for possible attacks
Read full review
NetApp
  • Previously were were running with just locally attached storage across all of our estate. With this tool we are not able to simplify the management of storage saving on resource usage across our Ops teams allowing us to focus on "more important" tasks.
Read full review
Quest Software
  • Highly reliable system backups
  • Great pricing compared to competitors.
  • Manual interference has gone down from almost 40% to initiate backups/recoveries.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Storage FlashSystem Screenshots

Screenshot of Flash Core Module 5th GenScreenshot of IBM FlashSystem 5600Screenshot of IBM FlashSystem 5600 (rear)Screenshot of IBM FlashSystem 7600 and 9600Screenshot of IBM FlashSystem 7600 and 9600 (rear)