IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Infor SunSystems
Score7.4 out of 10
N/A
Infor's SunSystems is an accounting and budgeting package and includes financials, budgeting and forecasting, and application portal modules.
N/A
Infor VISUAL
Score7.2 out of 10
N/A
Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Infor SunSystems
Infor VISUAL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Infor SunSystems
Infor VISUAL
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
IFS Applications
Infor SunSystems
Infor VISUAL
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
4.7
3 Ratings
46% below category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
Infor SunSystems
7.0
2 Ratings
8% below category average
Infor VISUAL
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Infor SunSystems
8.5
2 Ratings
4% above category average
Infor VISUAL
9.0
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.75 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
Infor SunSystems
4.7
2 Ratings
50% below category average
Infor VISUAL
4.0
3 Ratings
61% below category average
Dashboards
8.55 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Standard reports
8.25 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Custom reports
9.55 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Infor SunSystems
7.0
2 Ratings
9% below category average
Infor VISUAL
7.4
3 Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable
9.55 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.55 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.34 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.04 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.84 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
8.0
4 Ratings
0% above category average
Inventory tracking
9.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Location management
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Infor SunSystems
5.0
1 Ratings
38% below category average
Infor VISUAL
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Pricing
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Order entry
8.25 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.74 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
8.6
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Billing Management
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Period Close
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
7.2
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
3.0
1 Ratings
80% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
9.3
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
7.7
4 Ratings
10% above category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
3.2
2 Ratings
80% below category average
Production Process Design
9.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Production Management
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Work Execution
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Infor SunSystems
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
114% below category average
Forecasting
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Infor SunSystems and Infor VISUAL
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think the integration side of Infor SunSystems is really good where by it works well with our other business systems. It is easy to pick up for new staff members. We have not had to hold full blown training courses for unfamiliar users, they were able to use existing documentation and guides. The graphical interface is a drawback as it feels like you are using an old system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I struggle to identify a scenario where VISUAL is an appropriate solution. We used VISUAL because it was a legacy system and the cost/complexity of changeover seemed daunting. The user interface is poor as is the interconnectedness of the various screens and menus. This might be an acceptable piece of software for a continuous manufacturing environment with little variation of basic design, but we have had to write multiple add-on macros in order to get VISUAL to work effectively for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Integration options are very good. We are able to import data in a number of ways and extract data as well. The use of their built in API for data validation, extraction and entry is working very well for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Infor Visual has a standard way of addressing business operations: sales orders, invoicing, reporting. It is easy to train operators used to using a manual or other ERP system.
Material control is easy for production runs, R&D material lists and repairs. The process of receiving, issuing and returning material to inventory is facilitated by standard interfaces that are easily learned by material control operators.
Engineering changes to bills of material are facilitated by the "engineering Master" flexible editing capability. The version control for the BOM's can be as detailed or vague as the process designed dictates. One item of a BOM or the entire BOM can be changed quickly and approved for production that day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Although easy to use, Infor SunSystems has a very classical look which comes across outdated
Reporting feature is Infor SunSystems is not the best as it is not easy to create reports and the built in reports are limited in the filter options available
The Audit function needs configuring and is not ready out of the box so when you come to requiring audit data you can only retrieve after set up
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
VTA has been extremely unreliable. I would not recommend it. It is not customizable at all. There is no logical way to handle shift differentials which is a huge issue with a company that runs 24/7.
If you do not have a schedule set up, they cannot clock in. This poses a problem for anyone that gets called in on a shift they don't normally work on.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
With the cost of living we had to reign in the budget this year. As it's easy to export data out of Infor SunSystems we were able to report on spend and gain greater control of outgoings
One of our objectives is to build new homes for people. Infor SunSystems allowed us to budget and forecast all the costs to determine what we could achieve
With Infor SunSystems being a popular accounting software we are able to recruit previous Infor SunSystems users therefore not having to spend on training staff which is very costly.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info