TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IFS Applications vs. Oracle E-Business Suite vs. Oracle Hyperion (legacy)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IFS Applications

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AIFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A

    Oracle E-Business Suite

    Score6.3 out of 10
    N/AOracle E-Business Suite is a comprehensive suite of integrated, global business applications. The suite includes cross-industry capabilities spanning ERP, CRM and supply chain planning.N/A

    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AOracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.N/A
    Pricing
    IFS ApplicationsOracle E-Business SuiteOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IFS ApplicationsOracle E-Business SuiteOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IFS ApplicationsOracle E-Business SuiteOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Considered Multiple Products
    IFS
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    Chose Oracle E-Business Suite
    We went with Oracle because it is easy to manage and support and gives us timely updates and options for upgrades.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle E-Business Suite
    Stable and tested system. Cloud is still evolving for Oracle and capabilities are still in the nascent stage. Moving the entire business back end operations to an in development system can be risky.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle E-Business Suite
    None
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle E-Business Suite
    We have been using Oracle for more than 12 years now. We didn't even evaluate [it] as we are comfortable with the product and recently upgraded to the latest R12 version as well.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle E-Business Suite
    Before making the decision, we also analyzed Totvs (Brazilian very strong solution) and SAP. We discarded Totvs because at that time support was very weak in Argentina and Uruguay. We made a comparison between eBS and SAP. Since they both have almost the same modules and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle E-Business Suite
    SAP:
    • First of all the implementation time proposed for our scenario was to0 high (at least 3 years).
    • Second the price was too high and the GUI seemed very outdated.
    Incentivized
    Discontinued Products
    Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    It is the leading system, with the most power and flexibility of any of these. It is also the most expensive. Berkeley needs the best possible tool for this job. Questica and Workday cannot handle the number of dimensions we use. Adaptive might be a good competitor but since I …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    We also took a look to Cognos, but since we have Oracle eBS as our main ERP, we decided without a very deep analysis.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Pricing is one factor and the features offered by the Oracle EPM and IBM Cognos shifted the favour in terms of Oracle EPM.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IFS ApplicationsOracle E-Business SuiteOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    4.8
    3 Ratings
    44% below category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    6.6
    31 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Pay calculation8.13 Ratings3.029 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration7.43 Ratings5.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct deposit files6.43 Ratings8.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    8.8
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    5.6
    70 Ratings
    29% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    API for custom integration8.85 Ratings3.070 Ratings00 Ratings
    Plug-ins8.85 Ratings2.053 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.9
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    3.0
    73 Ratings
    95% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Single sign-on capability10.05 Ratings3.067 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions9.85 Ratings3.072 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    8.8
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    4.0
    66 Ratings
    61% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards8.55 Ratings5.043 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports8.35 Ratings4.064 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports9.55 Ratings3.064 Ratings00 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    7.5
    5 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    7.1
    81 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Accounts payable9.55 Ratings6.777 Ratings00 Ratings
    Accounts receivable9.55 Ratings7.175 Ratings00 Ratings
    Global Financial Support9.04 Ratings8.951 Ratings00 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.34 Ratings9.063 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations9.04 Ratings7.265 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting8.84 Ratings6.156 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standardized Processes9.04 Ratings6.158 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    5 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    4.7
    54 Ratings
    52% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Inventory tracking9.35 Ratings6.753 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic reordering9.55 Ratings2.037 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location management9.55 Ratings2.042 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    6.3
    5 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    7.5
    56 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Pricing9.05 Ratings4.050 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order entry8.25 Ratings7.052 Ratings00 Ratings
    Credit card processing8.74 Ratings8.040 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold8.35 Ratings7.050 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Orchestration7.84 Ratings8.936 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subledger and Financial Process
    Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.9
    4 Ratings
    64% below category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    8.0
    67 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Billing Management8.34 Ratings6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cash and Asset Management8.84 Ratings6.156 Ratings00 Ratings
    Travel & Expense Management8.84 Ratings6.049 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.84 Ratings3.040 Ratings00 Ratings
    Period Close9.34 Ratings7.160 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Financial Management
    Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    2.7
    1 Ratings
    95% below category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    7.8
    41 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings8.032 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Costing6.01 Ratings8.041 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost Capture5.01 Ratings8.034 Ratings00 Ratings
    Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings8.132 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings8.124 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings8.031 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Execution Management
    Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    67% below category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    6.4
    21 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Project Planning and Scheduling9.54 Ratings2.019 Ratings00 Ratings
    Task Insight for Project Managers8.54 Ratings2.019 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Mobile Functionality7.54 Ratings3.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Definable Resource Pools8.54 Ratings6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Grants Management
    Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.3
    2 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    7.4
    25 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Award Lifecycle Management9.32 Ratings3.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Procurement
    Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    68% below category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    6.8
    51 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Bids Analyzed and Compared9.33 Ratings2.028 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Authoring8.33 Ratings2.027 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Repository8.33 Ratings4.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.24 Ratings2.037 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supplier Management9.24 Ratings3.033 Ratings00 Ratings
    Risk Management
    Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    5.0
    4 Ratings
    30% below category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    6.6
    13 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Risk Repository8.54 Ratings6.011 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Management8.84 Ratings8.011 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Efficiency Assessments8.54 Ratings4.011 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue Detection7.54 Ratings5.012 Ratings00 Ratings
    Remediation and Certification8.04 Ratings8.013 Ratings00 Ratings
    Logistics
    Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    7.8
    4 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    5.6
    21 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Transportation Planning and Optimization8.32 Ratings3.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Transportation Execution Management9.02 Ratings2.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Trade and Customs Management8.02 Ratings4.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fulfillment Management7.73 Ratings4.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Warehouse Workforce Management8.54 Ratings2.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing
    Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    6.8
    4 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    6.0
    27 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Production Process Design9.33 Ratings4.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Production Management9.04 Ratings3.025 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration Management8.84 Ratings4.023 Ratings00 Ratings
    Work Execution9.34 Ratings7.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing Costs9.54 Ratings4.025 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supply Chain
    Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    5.7
    33 Ratings
    25% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Forecasting8.84 Ratings4.030 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Planning9.54 Ratings4.033 Ratings00 Ratings
    Performance Monitoring9.03 Ratings6.026 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Lifecycle Management
    Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    4.8
    4 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    6.7
    16 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Proposal Management8.33 Ratings2.013 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Master Data Management8.83 Ratings3.012 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    10.0
    22 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Long-term financial planning00 Ratings00 Ratings10.017 Ratings
    Financial budgeting00 Ratings00 Ratings10.020 Ratings
    Forecasting00 Ratings00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Scenario modeling00 Ratings00 Ratings10.016 Ratings
    Management reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle E-Business Suite
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    8.2
    20 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Personalized dashboards00 Ratings00 Ratings8.018 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings00 Ratings7.115 Ratings
    KPIs00 Ratings00 Ratings9.917 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings9.917 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings00 Ratings6.013 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IFS ApplicationsOracle E-Business SuiteOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Small Businesses
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IFS ApplicationsOracle E-Business SuiteOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    7.1
    (99 ratings)
    10.0
    (23 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    6.2
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IFS ApplicationsOracle E-Business SuiteOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IFS
    Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Oracle Cash and Treasury Management fill the gaps in treasury management with features that are very helpful in building the modern financial system that we so desperately need. It may not be the most intuitive tool on the treasury market, but with a little more practice time, important expense analysis can be achieved. I am confident in this treasury tool for this year 2022 and I would like to recommend it to other companies so that they can also have a better administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IFS
    • It supports the web version in most later versions.
    • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
    • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
    • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
    • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • The EBS Oracle Order Management and Shipping Execution solution allows the creation of an integrated, seamless order-to-cash process and accurately capture of customer orders across multiple channels.
    • Orchestration of order details for seamless fulfillment execution.
    • Efficient shipment planning and confirmation.
    • Communication of order status information to customers throughout the order lifecycle.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • This product handles budgeting by Employee and/or Position very well. It is highly flexible and allows Hyperion administrators the ability to develop a planning application that fits a variety of different business needs.
    • It is great at calculating benefits using business rules to automate the population of these fringe costs in the overall budget planning process. This greatly reduces user error.
    • It allows you to seed the operating budget based on changes to key drivers, such as percentage increases, flat dollar increases and more detailed changes using business rules.
    • Allows visibility into the plans for each unit across the organization, rolled up into an overall budget for the campus.
    • It handles the creation of budgets with multiple chartfield segments or dimensions, which most other budgeting systems cannot handle well. It can aggregate these very quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IFS
    • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Learning cure is a bit high for this product if you aren't already using a tool set like it.
    • finding where documents are stored can be tricky but once you find it you are golden.
    • Since I need a third one some of the API's need to be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • One pain point for us is the consolidation and translation process. Needing to translate the data over and over again is frustrating and there is no visibility into how many users are running a translation. If multiple users attempt to translate the same data set, say goodbye to your performance but you have no way of knowing! (Unless you want to pull up a task audit which is not a very realistic expectation). It has the been the quickest way for us to bring the system to it's knees. The consolidation process performs in direct correlation to the complexity of the calculation/consolidation rules. So, while the product is extremely flexible, you still have to be careful how you design your rules and calculations to make sure that you do it on the smallest subset of data as possible to avoid large processing times. This makes sense, but requires some significant expertise that most organizations do not have in-house.
    • The Hyperion Financial Reporting product is ridiculously outdated and clunky to use. The interface for designing reports is not intuitive, and not easy to modify once a report is built. I think there must be a strategic decision to move away from it and go to something more like Oracle BI because I just can't understand why in the world they don't update the reporting product. It also requires a significant level of expertise to be able to use. Not a great solution at all if you want multiple end-users to create reports in something other than Excel. Nobody except the HFM admin (which I used to be) in our company even touches this module.
    • Another pain point is the amount of IT support that is required to run this thing, and again, specialized knowledge of Hyperion products and how they work is required for IT to adequately support it. This goes for application servers and the Oracle database that the applications are running on.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    After almost 5 years, we have a full control of this ERP System. We are able to implement new functionalities and modules without any major "consulting" expenses. As of today we are making almost 90% of the personalization/customization and implementation all in house. Once [it] is tuned, [it] keeps running very well with no major issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
    Read full review
    Usability
    IFS
    The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    The various forms - like order entry forms that allow the uses to enter sales orders and the ability to personalize the views based on end user needs - are easy to use and follow standard business processes. The new release has a big focus on usability and forms now have a familiar web look and feel which has increased usability considerably.
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    Because of the transactional nature of the system this software is available 24 X 7, and IT is responsible for making sure the system is available during normal business hours.
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    The performance of the product is very good. Given the transactional nature of the system one of the key focus areas for IT is to make sure performance is not affected for internal reasons. This can also depend on the server configuration and setup. For example, performance on Exadata machine is far superior to other Linux custom systems that companies choose to deploy. In general though, as already pointed out, the platform is now very stable and has few bugs. Whenever there are any issues, the cause is usually customizations that we have made to the platform, rather than out-of-the-box standard functionality.
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IFS
    We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    In general, support has not been great - particularly standard (non premium) support . The main issue is that our IT staff has been using this platform for years and is very knowledgeable Whenever something goes wrong, we usually have a very precise idea of what the problem is. We are skilled at problem diagnosis. But the Oracle support process is very rigid and slow. Typically, we are required to go through a lengthy diagnosis process where they ask us multiple questions sometimes over several days and we are obliged to talk to different people with differing levels of knowledge. Since we already know what the problem is, we really just want a patch or a bug fix, but it takes days to get there instead of minutes. This can be very frustrating. This is a big part of the reason why we pay for premium support. But it's still a bit disappointing.
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    The instructors are usually precise and knowledgable, and it's convenient to take online classes whenever available any day of the year.
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    The key success factors for the implementation was project management, in-house expertise in IT and time. The implementation process started with the initial evaluation with the initial upgrade on a test system and mapping out the gaps and requirements. We did work with Oracle to understand the new functionality R12 had to offer and did another upgrade and researched solutions. With the use of software development cycle procedures there were conference room pilots with IT, business users. We then refined the project plan to the core key details, performed mock go-live implementations and finally upgraded the software. Overall, this was a very successful process.
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IFS
    IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Oracle e-business suite is better than any other ERP because it is more user-friendly and can be operated by anyone even those who don't know how to run it. Also it has better APS, allowing you to better track costs and allocate resources more efficiently. Also, it has better event management, tracking, and Reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work permits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    As I mentioned, it's a good tool but not the best
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IFS
    • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
    • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
    • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • We recently implemented Supplier Portal and Invoice Imaging Solution. This has reduced manual effort and increased speed and accuracy. There is no need for people to key in invoices manually now. Suppliers can flip a purchase order into invoice and Oracle will do all the validations and put the invoice on hold in case of any discrepancy.
    • Suppliers are very happy with the supplier portal as they can track the entire lifecycle of the invoice online.
    • With automation, we could bill all our customers on time. Oracle collects all the possible costs like payroll and expenses, adds markup, and bills our customers. We could track profitability and margins by project.
    • The period close and reporting has become easier and faster with this software. 3 people can close the periods now as opposed to 10 before.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Oracle Hyperion allows us to automate and consolidate financial data that used to be performed manually in spreadsheets. From that perspective the ROI is huge.
    • Oracle Hyperion functionality is extensive and allows us to perform most functions for planning, consolidating and reporting on our financial data.
    • One negative with Oracle Hyperion is that it is complicated to implement and maintain. It takes expertise at all levels (infrastructure and management) to realize the benefits from it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IFS Applications Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot