IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Oracle Service
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Service is the help desk and customer experience management platform from Oracle. The technology was developed and supported by RightNow Technologies as RightNow CX for cloud-based call center automation, until that company's acquisition by Oracle in 2011 for about $1.5 billion.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Oracle Service
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Oracle Service
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Oracle Service
Features
IFS Applications
Oracle Service
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.4
3 Ratings
50% below category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
6.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
5.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.1
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Billing Management
7.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.4
2 Ratings
24% above category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
4 Ratings
23% above category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
4 Ratings
45% below category average
Oracle Service
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Oracle Service
7.7
78 Ratings
6% below category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets
00 Ratings
8.073 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
7.053 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
7.057 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
8.050 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission
00 Ratings
8.074 Ratings
Ticket response
00 Ratings
8.074 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Oracle Service
7.0
74 Ratings
14% below category average
External knowledge base
00 Ratings
6.065 Ratings
Internal knowledge base
00 Ratings
8.074 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Product A and Product B
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Oracle Right (Oracle Service Cloud) was an important evolution in the group's ombudsman channel management processes. We brought the Oracle Service Cloud to digitize the processes for capturing and managing the group's ombudsman channel, no longer operating manually (MS Excel).
Oracle Service Cloud (Right Now) brought about an important evolution in the management processes of the group's ombudsman channel, where activities that were performed manually, repetitively and with risk of errors, are now operated by the Right Now platform itself, whether by API, or by automation of the tool.
Oracle Service Cloud needs a better built in integration with Oracle Social Cloud or it needs to build in more Social network capabilities.
SMS is handle via a third party application but could be built in as part of the product.
The knowledge foundation product needs a better way to handle multiple languages. Currently you have to purchase an additional interface for each language. You can purchase the more expensive Knowledge Advance which does have a better language feature.
Although RightNow is extremely flexible, the flexibility comes with a price. It is often not intuitive which settings you need to change (and under which menus these setting are buried) to enable the system to do what you want. Also, sometimes the system can do things you need, but you don't initially realize it. When RightNow sells a system to a new customer, I think it should come with X hours of consulting time with a RightNow expert. The customer should be able to consult with this expert over the next year to get advice concerning how to configure the system to achieve desired needs. Often RightNow Support would just answer "no" when I asked if I could do something, but then I would find another way to achieve my goals after talking with other companies using RightNow.
The learning curve is fairly steep; but for something that has this much capability, it's nearly impossible to make it "easy". The layout and organization are at least reasonably intuitive. The hardest part-- the "weakest link"-- is the portal development (where you can build help centers and other end-user pages.) The capabilities there are significant, but the learning curve for that part is especially steep and it takes a fair amount of expertise to be able to update it.
We use a lot of tabs and fields on our incident workspace, which should slow the system down, but it's still quite fast, and we continue to optimize whatever is possible.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Technicians seem to be assessed based solely on how quickly they close the issues. I've had to reopen requests multiple times because they didn't actually solve my problem. Also, when the issue has even a moderate amount of complexity, the technicians often instruct me to "open another SR" to handle the other issue. I'm the customer, I shouldn't have to follow their processes, they should handle that for me. But even when I create the new SR, it seems like their right hand isn't talking to their left - they aren't reading back to the previous issue for context. So I get bounced around a lot, and I have to tell them how to do their job
Most of our training was given while doing user acceptance testing, and getting the system approved by the market. When ever we were in doubt, our implementer helped us along. Later on we started exploring by our selves.
Work with a RightNow expert during the implementation. Explain features that would you like to have. Often, somebody who really knows the system can show you what you need to do to achieve the desired results. Where a RightNow support engineer or a consultant might say "the system can't do that," a RightNow application engineer will listen to what you need, and often come up with an alternate path to achieve it
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
TCS' customers who also selected Oracle Service Cloud over Salesforce Service Cloud and GE's ServiceMax in the Mfg. vertical in which I work, did so because of the robust ability of Oracle Service Cloud and its APIs to integrate with other value-add solutions for manufacturers such as IoT applications, Big Data Analytics, and Field Service applications.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.