IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Tagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Features
IFS Applications
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.5
3 Ratings
48% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
7.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
5 Ratings
12% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.2
5 Ratings
24% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
66% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.4
2 Ratings
23% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
29% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.6
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
11% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.7
4 Ratings
44% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.1
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
8.58 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
7.3
24 Ratings
6% below category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
6.523 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
7.023 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
7.17 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.516 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.3
15 Ratings
15% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
9.810 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
9.813 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
7.712 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.811 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Scenarios where CCH Tagetik is suitable is when a company have large amounts of data and want to transform, consolidate, store and produce reporting in different year, period etc with complex calculations and allocation. Tagetik is the tool for you in this case and it's very flexible in terms of creating your own business rule, calculation and reporting options with a user friendly interface. I have not thought about scenarios where it is not appropriate to use tagetik yet as the tool covers small and large business financial needs
Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
Because in my oppinion Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is one of the most usable tools for consolidation, planning (controlling) and reporting. Its usability is quite easy and innovative. I like the data entry method for the customers with its workflow and tasks, quite easy way to implement a co pilot. And i like the reporting tool, with a lot of customization opportunities.
Surprisingly, this platform is a powerhouse ERP system. However, given time, when more and more organization is able to identify how powerful this tool can be, CCH Tagetik is able to stand as a competitive advantage to many of the Financial industry of today. Although, it needs time to understand the logic behind how CCH Tagetik is formed and setup, once it is known to the user, it is an easy day to day operations with minimal maintenance.
CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
I got very quick respons. After very little mail iterations, they decided to have online meeting to look together with me to the issue. They tried to solve it during the meeting. I had the impression that the customer care person really knew the system and was able to ask help from other colleagues when needed
At the official deployment of the original product Controlling and Accounting teams went to Lucca and were walked through the product, Excel usage, Design, ETL run
several times since the deployment of the product in 2013 we got on-line training on new functions or on very specific questions/issues (e.g. ETL customisation), followed by the usage of the Learning Hub since 2025
we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the application is much easier. IBM Cognos TM1 had a lot of issues with certain modules that could not be open concurrently; this would often lead to phantom data being entered in the system. I have not had these issues with CCH Tagetik.
A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.