IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Zendesk Sell
Score9.7 out of 10
N/A
Zendesk Sell (formerly Base CRM) is a CRM that aims to give reps access to integrated tools that provide the full context of a customer account. This keeps them in the loop and allows them to capitalize on opportunities. Zendesk Sell can be extended with Reach, a lead generation and engagement tool that automates the process of finding and keeping leads interested, so reps can focus more on building relationships and crushing their quotas.
Base CRM was founded in 2009, and acquired by Zendesk…
$19
per seat/month billed annually
Pricing
IFS Applications
Zendesk Sell
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Sell Team
$19.00
per seat/month billed annually
Reach prospecting enrichment add-on (requires a Sell Subscription)
$27.00
Per User Per Month (billed annually)
Sell Professional
$49.00
per seat/month billed annually
Sell Enterprise
$99.00
per seat/month billed annually
Sell Elite
$199.00
per seat/month billed annually
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Zendesk Sell
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
IFS Applications
Zendesk Sell
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
4.8
3 Ratings
44% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Zendesk Sell
4.2
15 Ratings
58% below category average
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
3.08 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom fields
00 Ratings
7.815 Ratings
Custom objects
00 Ratings
4.910 Ratings
Scripting environment
00 Ratings
1.16 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Zendesk Sell
9.5
14 Ratings
12% above category average
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
9.912 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.85 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
8.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Pricing
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
9.3
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
4.8
4 Ratings
42% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
6.6
15 Ratings
17% below category average
Customer data management / contact management
00 Ratings
8.914 Ratings
Workflow management
00 Ratings
6.115 Ratings
Territory management
00 Ratings
4.98 Ratings
Opportunity management
00 Ratings
7.913 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
00 Ratings
6.915 Ratings
Contract management
00 Ratings
5.410 Ratings
Quote & order management
00 Ratings
3.97 Ratings
Interaction tracking
00 Ratings
7.915 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
00 Ratings
7.811 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
9.0
12 Ratings
16% above category average
Case management
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Call center management
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Help desk management
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
6.9
12 Ratings
11% below category average
Lead management
00 Ratings
6.012 Ratings
Email marketing
00 Ratings
7.89 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
5.3
13 Ratings
37% below category average
Task management
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
00 Ratings
1.05 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.013 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
8.2
15 Ratings
7% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
7.812 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
00 Ratings
7.914 Ratings
Customizable reports
00 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
4.0
5 Ratings
61% below category average
Social data
00 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Social engagement
00 Ratings
6.95 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Feature
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
5.4
7 Ratings
33% below category average
Marketing automation
00 Ratings
9.87 Ratings
Compensation management
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of IFS Applications and Zendesk Sell
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Zendesk sell is best for organizations that want a clean and simple, yet powerfully effective CRM tool. It's intuitive, extremely user-friendly, supplies lots of video tutorials and access to the California team for FAQ's, and has all the features other, more complicated, expensive CRM's have. Great for institutions that have a need to tailor their database to fit your needs; and track sales, tasks, and pipeline projects in graphic form. It's affordable and has a great app for mobile phones that allows access to contacts, notes, tasks, and a workable platform while on the go in real time. It's simple to teach new users how to navigate and utilize. Adding or deleting users is simple, and access to the CRM information can be limited/private or made public for the entire team to access. Not as costly as some of the competing products, so if you are on a tight budget this may be the tool for you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
My favorite piece is the Tasks connected to the Clients OR the Deals themselves that keep the process moving with the right steps, and helps our team from doubling our work, or missing a piece that is crucial for the completion of the sale.
The email integration helps to keep all things housed in one place also, so that you're not bouncing back and forth in multiple platforms to stay on top of the orders.
Customizations are a HUGE part of why we use Base CRM right now. We can make sure we are recording all of the right information, and not wasting time by having to fill in or skip over content that doesn't apply to our business model.
I also like the ability to tied Deals to multiple people, especially as Referrals come across, so we don't forget how we got in touch with different clients.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I received about two hours worth of training on Zendesk Sell (formerly Base CRM). I will say it's a clean look and the ability to change views is extremely helpful. I do wish there were other features that allowed the views to be more simplistic. Some views can be overwhelming to look at. Nevertheless with the minimum training, I am still able to navigate through Zendesk Sell (formerly Base CRM) successfully due to the ease of usability.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Due to the ease of the product, I have not had the chance to reach out to support yet. I’ve had no reason. The resources provided to clients are extremely helpful and detailed. So far my questions have been pretty basic and I generally just ask my colleague or teammate. They're able to assist with the answer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This product has a great backing of users, but needs more options direct from Base CRM on all operations of the software. YouTube videos do a great job of helping implement, and the back end support is a great help as well. The CRM is a great free option, and should be treated as such.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Simpler than most CRMs, which can be good if your sales team is not very tech savvy. We switched to HubSpot which provides a lot more value than Base did, but it isn't right for everyone. HubSpot is focused on capturing in-bound leads and has its own flaws and limitations, but overall it's a better fit for our needs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info