Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Score6.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is used to automate and modernize global financial operations. The application can monitor performance in real time, predict future outcomes, and support data-driven decisions to drive business growth.
$2,520
per year per user
Pricing
Infor VISUAL
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Dynamics 365 Finance
$2520
per year per user
Dynamics 365 Finance Premium
$3600
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Infor VISUAL
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Infor VISUAL
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
6.8
2 Ratings
11% below category average
API for custom integration
1.01 Ratings
5.62 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
9.0
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability
9.01 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.01 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
4.0
3 Ratings
61% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
6.7
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Dashboards
8.03 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Standard reports
2.02 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Custom reports
2.01 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
7.4
3 Ratings
4% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
8.1
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable
9.03 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.03 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Global Financial Support
10.02 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
8.02 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
10.02 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.02 Ratings
5.62 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.02 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Time tracking
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Fixed asset management
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Multi-currency support
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Multi-division support
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Regulations compliance
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Self-service portal
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Localizations
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
8.0
4 Ratings
0% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
5.0
1 Ratings
37% below category average
Inventory tracking
6.04 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Automatic reordering
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.04 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Manufacturing module
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
5.0
1 Ratings
39% below category average
Pricing
10.03 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Order entry
10.03 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
10.04 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Order Orchestration
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
8.6
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
7.2
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Project Costing
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
3.2
2 Ratings
80% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
114% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Inventory Planning
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Feature
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
115% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Product Master Data Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
I struggle to identify a scenario where VISUAL is an appropriate solution. We used VISUAL because it was a legacy system and the cost/complexity of changeover seemed daunting. The user interface is poor as is the interconnectedness of the various screens and menus. This might be an acceptable piece of software for a continuous manufacturing environment with little variation of basic design, but we have had to write multiple add-on macros in order to get VISUAL to work effectively for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Its well suited for medium and large organizations that needs strong financial control , automated workflows , inter-company accounting and real-time reporting . It works wonderfully with all the Microsoft products . However , it may be less useful for small businesses as it requires a good investment in implementation , customization , licensing and user training
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Infor Visual has a standard way of addressing business operations: sales orders, invoicing, reporting. It is easy to train operators used to using a manual or other ERP system.
Material control is easy for production runs, R&D material lists and repairs. The process of receiving, issuing and returning material to inventory is facilitated by standard interfaces that are easily learned by material control operators.
Engineering changes to bills of material are facilitated by the "engineering Master" flexible editing capability. The version control for the BOM's can be as detailed or vague as the process designed dictates. One item of a BOM or the entire BOM can be changed quickly and approved for production that day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
VTA has been extremely unreliable. I would not recommend it. It is not customizable at all. There is no logical way to handle shift differentials which is a huge issue with a company that runs 24/7.
If you do not have a schedule set up, they cannot clock in. This poses a problem for anyone that gets called in on a shift they don't normally work on.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As the UI is modern and user friendly which makes it easy to navigate . The dashboard , workspace and personalized view helps to access the right set of information with ease
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is more robust, and can handle larger, more complex business operations, and have better delineation between corporate management and divisions in a company, but it is not flexible, nor easy to change. It is complex, inflexible, and difficult to incorporate new workflows or business rules to accommodate changes in the business. We have changed over the past decade and while F&O is big and robust, it is not nimble.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info