Likelihood to Recommend Intellimize has done a great job of targeting our highest trafficked pages. For a demand generation organization it helps provide a lot value for places like the homepage or various high value funnels. Where Intellimize falls short is where we have a specific technology stack that often causes issues for us being able to run tests at scale because some experiments break or fail to run. Please do yourself a favor and evaluate this tool with your development team before purchasing. Single Page Applications do have re-rendering issues given some experiments which lead to run-time issues that need to be heavily QA'd before launch. For teams that are ecommerce or have a typical technology stack (e.g. wordpress and static pages), then Intellimize will probably work without any issues.
Read full review If a new feature should be added but unsure of how it will actually work or how users will accept the new enhancement or change, this tool allows you test and measure initial results. This saves so much time and energy knowing the results before it is deployed and might have low user adoption or acceptance.
Read full review Pros CSM and Engineering resources are available with Intellimize and allows us to spend more time thinking about new ideas to implement. AI/Machine Learning allows winning personalizations to continually run or switch between variants for users that may convert better based on firmographic data The CSM is a wonderful collaborator and acts as a liaison between Intellimize's engineering team. With their help, I am able to better refine my own testing roadmap. Read full review A/B or Multi Variant Testing as a methodology to gather insight from customer usage. Experimentation as a feature within LaunchDarkly offers information around the success of one variant over another and whether the experiment has reached statistical significance. Being able to decouple deployment of code from the release of a feature is hugely valuable. Development teams are empowered to manage features within their production applications for reliability or testing purposes. Read full review Cons No WYSIWIG Editor Limited to only 5 tests a week QA of larger tests that require heavier engineering effort can often run longer than a week and can block the already limited number of tests you can run Read full review Limited number of users on cheaper plans that is limiting our ability to audit log who is making changes. Some of our engineers are confused between flags and segments and have set up items incorrectly. Better documented support for React with Typescript. Read full review Likelihood to Renew It fits out business case
Read full review Usability It's very easy to create new feature flags and set them properly. It is more difficult to get LaunchDarkly integrated within a distributed system so that flags can be used. Especially on stateless servers where gating features by user is not easy. Overall though, it is very easy to get started and I like how simple it is to use.
Read full review Reliability and Availability No issue with availability at all
Read full review Performance From what I have seen, LaunchDarkly integrates well with your code and also services you might have in your tech ecosystem. We use Jenkins for automation and we were able to use it to build pipelines to automate the control of LaunchDarkly toggles in our code.
Read full review Support Rating The overall support is very responsive
Read full review Implementation Rating Yes I do.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Intellimize is a league above products like
VWO and
Google Optimize . Simply having the support from an external engineering team gives your web team the freedom and bandwidth to do more. The level of support for
Google Optimize is entirely limited, especially if you're using the free version of that product, and I am skeptical of paying Google for the paid version of it since the largest value of the paid version of Optimize, is to simply run more tests.
VWO has amazing heatmap and reporting, but severely lacks any Machine Learning or firmographic data. While their support is exceptional, it's not the same as having a dedicated CSM to help plan a roadmap. It's also helpful to note that
VWO ,
Google Optimize , and Intellimize have issues with single page applications. Static websites are likely to run entirely fine without issue.
Read full review LaunchDarkly stood out to us because it put control of the application within the hands of our engineers. We didn't want to allow business users to manipulate the production site via a third-party tool. Instead, our focus was on delivering faster as an engineering team.
Read full review Scalability The platform didn't go down since we implemented it
Read full review Return on Investment Increased revenue Helped us build out many tests that had the impact of many years of learnings Contributed to more MQLs influenced Read full review Improved developer experience with some teams moving to Trunk-based Development. Increased deployment frequency due to smaller code releases. Validation of the technical and business value of work is achieved more quickly through smaller pieces of work and through experimenting with a small group of users before a feature gets to 100% of customers. Read full review ScreenShots