Ironclad, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is designed to streamline every part of the contract process—so users can focus on legal work, not paperwork.
N/A
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI, streamlines end-to-end contract workflows. Its intelligent, AI-native contract repository can be up and running in days. It combines pre- trained and customizable AI with integrations and enterprise-grade governance.
N/A
Pricing
Ironclad
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ironclad
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ironclad
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
Features
Ironclad
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Ironclad
6.3
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
5.7
1 Ratings
35% below category average
Contract creation
9.04 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Contract templates
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
3.24 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Guided logic
3.73 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Ironclad
7.8
5 Ratings
4% below category average
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
4.6
1 Ratings
55% below category average
Contract sharing
8.45 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Contract editing
7.35 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
8.45 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval process
7.85 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
7.85 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Ironclad
5.1
5 Ratings
47% below category average
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
6.1
1 Ratings
30% below category average
Contract database
6.04 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Contract search
7.05 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
2.64 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Custom contract reports
5.04 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Tracking contract status
4.54 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Compliance check
3.23 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
Ironclad
7.7
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
-
Ratings
Contract Storage
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced Search and Filtering
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable Contract Templates
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Acceleration
8.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
E-Signatures
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reminders and Alerts
5.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
5.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with other Systems
6.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Ironclad
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
Workday Contract Lifecycle Management, powered by Evisort AI
Likelihood to Recommend
Ironclad
I think it worked realllly well at my previous company where we used it for a very simple form that just required one simple signature from both sides- this was a form used to record custom pricing/discounts for a product that typically was not discounted. In my current role, there are many more required fields on the form/contract, and can be multiple levels of approvals on one side, and then possibly multiple levels of approvals/signatures on the other side. I've never used another solution in the exact same way (like DocuSign) to be able to compare experiences, but on Ironclad, understanding where I am in the completion process can be confusing. Within the app, I wish it was more of just a checklist or schedule of what needs to happen, but it's not written out that clearly. Lastly, there is something wrong with our notifications (I'm not sure if this is specific to my company's settings)- I frequently get 'contract completed' or 'contract signed' email notifications even if that hasn't occurred. They seem to correlate with updating the form or refreshing the sync from SFDC.
Evisort is best when you already have all your contracts fully cleaned, designated, ordered, managed, linked, collated, titled and termed. It is not good if you expect the platform to help you go through a repository of contracts that you want the system to extract all the info you need and then you can decide easily what to keep and not etc - the sales team will tell you that the platform can do all of this. In my opinion, this isn't true.
Ironclad is the best tool I have used to date, to manage workflow and tickets. It was very easy to use and navigate from the very first time I used it. My time is very valuable and I don't have time to sit in training sessions, simply to use a new product. I'm happy to say that I was never formally trained on Ironclad as it simply wasn't necessary.
It is clunkier than needs to be but it's not as bad as some of the other platforms we reviewed. The interface is pretty spartan, almost like reading a page and some color and segregation could help users segregate the UI by function and task. This is pretty straight forward but doubt they would implement
I haven't used the support services for IronClad, but I understand from our legal team, the support is very good, they have replied and provide solutions quickly and effectively. I have used the documentation and support pages which are very complete and which have been updated given the user interface updates.
For all of the reasons listed above, essentially, once the platform is implemented it has its value, however, knowing what you get before implementation, might give ppl pause. The cost is a bit misleading and the sales team over promises and under delivers in my opinion. This is not cool and creates issues inevitably, down the line.
Evisort is just getting in the game. Implementation is not as robust as Coupa and Adobe is more of a contract execution platform so it is not apples to apples to compare there. Essentially, Evisort is a a somewhat cheaper solution that is not a complete solution and needs more of an upfront lift than they would suggest.
At Gusto, where we operated on no contracts for many years, Ironclad allowed us to create a very simple process for getting approval for, and keeping records of, customized pricing on our new, high-end plan.
Wasn't part of the buying committee, but in my current role it's been heavily utilized externally for customer contracts, but also internally for employee agreements.
I don't have any actual numbers, and don't have a way to compare it to any prior e-signature setup.