Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs. Ivanti Security Controls

In an environment with PCs in multiple offices so you can view inventory, push job tasks/patches, run updates, and remote in for assistance.

Agentless patching is the best of all the products I've used. The real-time updates that don't require re-scanning after each step is great.

Incentivized

• Allows remote control of other PCs with minimal problems
• Create and push jobs to PCs on the network.
• View inventory of a computer and run queries based on info.

• Trusted ownership checking is a good way to implement effective basic protection.
• Patching is important today to react quickly to security problems. With Security Controls, it's easier than ever before.
• One console for whole security.

• Remoting in to computers sometimes takes a while or needs an inventory scan run multiple times. Also has a lag or resolution problems.
• Patches
• No other complaints based on my usage.

• Performance of the console when using agentless machines.
• The console layout is a bit cumbersome - would be better if all functions were accessible from one screen.
• Common deployment examples to assist with deployment types.

Incentivized

Support wasn't used as the cost didn't justify the expense. We have yet to use the support.

Incentivized

Since we have been using Application Control for about 15 years, it is, of course, the best solution for us. We also looked at other products (RES One Workspace), but they didn't convince us. Some features of RES were good and are now part of the User Workspace Manager. The Microsoft solution seems too complicated to us and does not have the advantages of Trusted Ownership Checking.

• Allowed for quick assistance from our helpdesk.
• Helps in migration to Windows 1803
• Provides license and inventory information for software.

• Reduced amount of operating hours for administration of patching.

Incentivized