Jellyfish vs. ServiceNow DevOps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jellyfish
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Jellyfish is an intelligence platform for AI-Integrated Engineering. According to the vendor, the solution assists over 1,000 companies—including DraftKings, Box, and Blue Yonder—in utilizing Artificial Intelligence to manage software development lifecycles. By aggregating engineering data and contextual intelligence, Jellyfish is designed to help Research and Development (R&D) organizations measure impact, adopt industry practices, and support decision-making across AI adoption, project…N/A
ServiceNow DevOps
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
ServiceNow DevOps is designed to reduce friction between IT operations and development. This DevOps tool allows businesses to minimize risk while scaling DevOps initiatives.N/A
Pricing
JellyfishServiceNow DevOps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JellyfishServiceNow DevOps
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JellyfishServiceNow DevOps
Considered Both Products
Jellyfish
Chose Jellyfish
GitHub provided a lot of issues for us from an end-user point of view. Overall, Jellyfish is more intuitive; although it does come with its struggles and downfalls, these are something that just takes time to figure out. GitHub was more focused on developing metrics ONLY, and a …
Chose Jellyfish
The really cool thing about Jellyfish is the integrations that it has with the other tools, which are also very common within the software development industry. Consolidating all this data and being able to see graphs, numbers, and percentages in one place gives you a better …
ServiceNow DevOps
Chose ServiceNow DevOps
ServiceNow DevOps is easier to use and understand, and we can manage everything in comparatively less amount of time. It's very user-friendly. Tracking activities and ticket creation is a lot better in ServiceNow DevOps
Chose ServiceNow DevOps
I think both pieces of software have their positives and negatives. In some ways I preferred ATOS as it had a lot more complex options for selecting what you were looking for, however, I found it more difficult to navigate. ServiceNow DevOps has felt a lot cleaner to move …
Chose ServiceNow DevOps
As mentioned previously, not sure if ServiceNow DevOps can handle tickets in an agile methodology, where everything is setup based on Sprints, stories and the whole agile terminology. We use OpsGenie to setup shifts for Production support teams, OpsGenie alerts people through …
Best Alternatives
JellyfishServiceNow DevOps
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JellyfishServiceNow DevOps
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
JellyfishServiceNow DevOps
Likelihood to Recommend
I really recommend using Jellyfish; if this is something that your company is looking for, definitely give it a try. The Jellyfish team is also very responsive and supportive while updating, changing, or modifying required data. Having metrics from different tools in one place is very useful, especially when you have several engineering teams.
Read full review
Well suited to plan and apply any applications using the DevOps technology. The application keeps track of all the different stages of an application built and provides adequate support.
Read full review
Pros
  • Integration with JIRA.
  • Integration with GitHub.
  • Friendly UI.
  • Easy to read.
Read full review
  • Knowledge base is central to all internal and external.
  • Easy to add articles to the KB.
  • The ticketing system is central to all internal and external.
  • The ticketing system is easy to use.
  • The ticketing system makes it easy to ticketing data for analysis.
Read full review
Cons
  • UI and navigation aren't very intuitive and require additional research before being able to use.
  • The individual developer metrics are not very useful and make the interface feel cluttered.
  • Overall, it takes time for the end-user to truly learn how to use the platform and navigate. There is so much information/data available that although the above is a con, we felt it still made sense, despite the learning curve.
Read full review
  • I'd like to see more interaction with email. Once a ticket is closed I'd like to have an email come to me automatically and just be able to click on something to effectively close the ticket in ServiceNow DevOps after providing closing details
  • I'd like in certain exceptions to be able to open tickets with time in past.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
GitHub provided a lot of issues for us from an end-user point of view. Overall, Jellyfish is more intuitive; although it does come with its struggles and downfalls, these are something that just takes time to figure out. GitHub was more focused on developing metrics ONLY, and a lot of these metrics were black and white, which resulted in a failure to analyze the bigger picture. GitHub's metrics were mostly unreliable. After using Jellyfish for the past 2ish years, we love it so much better. Despite the learning curve to understand how to use the interface, overall, this provides so much more insights and analytics in a way that allows us to be strategic with our business goals.
Read full review
ServiceNow DevOps is easier to use and understand, and we can manage everything in comparatively less amount of time. It's very user-friendly. Tracking activities and ticket creation is a lot better in ServiceNow DevOps
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Easy setup and takes time to learn, but overall easy to use one you get the hang of it.
  • Strategic roadmapping.
  • Return on Investment increased.
Read full review
  • Cohesive and efficient communication.
Read full review
ScreenShots