Joomla! vs. Oracle WebCenter Content

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Joomla
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Joomla! is a free and open source content management system used to publish web content. Included features are page caching, RSS feeds, printable versions of pages, news flashes, blogs, polls, a search function, and support for language internationalization.N/A
Oracle WebCenter Content
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.N/A
Pricing
Joomla!Oracle WebCenter Content
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JoomlaOracle WebCenter Content
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Joomla!Oracle WebCenter Content
Features
Joomla!Oracle WebCenter Content
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Joomla!
8.3
51 Ratings
1% above category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.351 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Joomla!
6.7
48 Ratings
15% below category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
API7.246 Ratings00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language6.147 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Joomla!
7.7
54 Ratings
1% below category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor8.353 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness8.551 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section8.249 Ratings00 Ratings
Page templates7.052 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes6.350 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design7.550 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.450 Ratings00 Ratings
Form generator7.546 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Joomla!
7.6
52 Ratings
1% above category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy7.951 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO support7.650 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management8.049 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions7.052 Ratings00 Ratings
Community / comment management7.250 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Joomla!
-
Ratings
Oracle WebCenter Content
7.6
4 Ratings
6% below category average
Content capture & imaging00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Document management00 Ratings8.64 Ratings
Records management00 Ratings7.24 Ratings
Content search & retrieval00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings6.93 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Automated workflows00 Ratings7.12 Ratings
Artificial intelligence00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Integration00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Joomla!Oracle WebCenter Content
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Epicor ECM
Epicor ECM
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Joomla!Oracle WebCenter Content
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(75 ratings)
7.2
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(28 ratings)
7.9
(2 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(14 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
9.9
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.8
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(4 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.9
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Joomla!Oracle WebCenter Content
Likelihood to Recommend
The Joomla Project
If your developers want to have some fun, Joomla offers the stability and friendliness to do custom coding. Certain marketing initiatives require us to get "cute" with the interface, and Joomla allows for that a bit easier than WordPress (and definitely easier than sites like Squarespace). The security of Joomla is also always a plus.
Read full review
Oracle
WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
Read full review
Pros
The Joomla Project
  • Security. Its got many new features in the new Joomla! 4 which make the already good security even better. I like the ability to use my Yubi keys to log in with the new webauth standard, I don't think any other CMS has that built in
  • W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 (with AA compliance)
  • Really good SEO that gets our sites to the top of the search engines again without the need for any extra things
  • Speed, it gets a really good score (100%) in the google lighthouse on our server, can't beat that
Read full review
Oracle
  • It provided one single repository with a URL link to access each AP invoice.
  • It gives a life cycle to each invoice where a business user can perform some additional indexing as per their needs.
  • It also provides a reporting feature and a front-end for users to view invoices with ease and very helpful for auditing purpose.
  • It uses the BPEL engine to customize the life cycle and also it can automate the auto entry of supplier invoices in your EBS system.
  • Reduce a lot of manual efforts, manual errors and workforce.
Read full review
Cons
The Joomla Project
  • Because Joomla's user community is smaller than WP, it lacks as many choices from 3rd party developers, meaning it can be a little more difficult to find the right extension for what you need to accomplish
  • Along the same vein, most of the best 3rd-party software for Joomla! is paid
  • Simple features such as Add to Menu and Cache cleaners should be adopted as part of the Joomla! core, though they are available as extensions
  • Joomla! could use a simpler and easier URL rewriting process
Read full review
Oracle
  • Some functionality you would expect to be built-in (such as reporting for compliance) is not and requires other Oracle products to be integrated.
  • Separating an invoice with multiple lines for different departments is not an easy task.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The Joomla Project
I gave it a rating of 10 because I just love how Joomla! works, how it is set up and how it handles many users. Also it is very fast, and there is no overload on the MySQL database or servers ever.
Read full review
Oracle
The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
Read full review
Usability
The Joomla Project
Joomla! 3.x is easily installed either manually or via a script provided by your host. It contains most of the tools needed to begin creating websites right from the start. Those features that it doesn't have are easily installed via links and buttons from the thousands of extensions available in the community
Read full review
Oracle
It meets all required functionality requirements -- but handles none of them in an exceptional manner
Read full review
Performance
The Joomla Project
Today's Modern Joomla performs very well and is robust and durable. The pages load faster than they ever did in the past and Modern Joomla's integration into other software or systems has become seamless. Modern Joomla sites will last long and will stay running forever.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The Joomla Project
Between the core Joomla developers who are excellent at answering questions and providing support, you have a whole community of developers who work with Joomla and are happy to help fellow developers out answering questions and supporting the Joomla project. Out of the many communities I am involved in for open-source software, Joomla's community is by far the best.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The Joomla Project
It is good if you know Joomla! if not it can get a bit confusing
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The Joomla Project
Joomla has gone through tremendous growing pains. It is now better than ever. But before, when it was going from 1.5-2.5, the templates and plugins would break over and over again. If you don't understand what Joomla was trying to do back then, you might have a bad attitude toward it. Today, those pains are over and things don't break like they used to during that time period.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The Joomla Project
We tested other platforms like WordPress, Magento and some local CMS. 
But Joomla offered us better resources for generating content.
Joomla is a CMS suitable for many types of projects, especially if you have several people editing content at the same time.
It allows you to maintain visual standardization and offers many options for working with images.
With its ability to control access to different articles, categories or even different components, it is a great tool, even if they are managed by different people.
Read full review
Oracle
I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
Read full review
Return on Investment
The Joomla Project
  • Joomla has reduced our costs of rolling out a new website because it uses less developer time and can be rolled out by individual users as needed.
  • Joomla has a lot of extensions and add-ons that make it easy to create and implement advanced solutions quickly.
Read full review
Oracle
  • We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
  • WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
  • WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
  • Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.
Read full review
ScreenShots