Jupyter Notebook vs. Pytorch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…N/A
Pytorch
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Pytorch is an open source machine learning (ML) framework boasting a rich ecosystem of tools and libraries that extend PyTorch and support development in computer vision, NLP and or that supports other ML goals.N/A
Pricing
Jupyter NotebookPytorch
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jupyter NotebookPytorch
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jupyter NotebookPytorch
Considered Both Products
Jupyter Notebook
Chose Jupyter Notebook
It should have cleaner support for multi-environment setup and should also increase the amount of features. Moreover, more support should be present for other programming languages. It should also have the option to set a specific location that opens up whenever I run command …
Pytorch
Chose Pytorch
Saving and loading Machine/Deep Learning models is very easy with Pytorch. It provides visualization capabilities when combined with Tensorboard, and mathematical operations are highly optimized. Easy to understand for a person who is an expert in Python. It takes significantly …
Features
Jupyter NotebookPytorch
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.0
22 Ratings
8% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration7.415 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
7.0
22 Ratings
19% below category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Visualization6.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.5
22 Ratings
16% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors9.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.3
22 Ratings
11% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning9.218 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
10.0
20 Ratings
17% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options10.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls10.019 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Jupyter NotebookPytorch
Small Businesses
IBM Watson Studio
IBM Watson Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Jupyter NotebookPytorch
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(23 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Jupyter NotebookPytorch
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
I've created a number of daisy chain notebooks for different workflows, and every time, I create my workflows with other users in mind. Jupiter Notebook makes it very easy for me to outline my thought process in as granular a way as I want without using innumerable small. inline comments.
Read full review
Open Source
They have created Pytorch Lightening on top of Pytorch to make the life of Data Scientists easy so that they can use complex models they need with just a few lines of code, so it's becoming popular. As compared to TensorFlow(Keras), where we can create custom neural networks by just adding layers, it's slightly complicated in Pytorch.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Simple and elegant code writing ability. Easier to understand the code that way.
  • The ability to see the output after each step.
  • The ability to use ton of library functions in Python.
  • Easy-user friendly interface.
Read full review
Open Source
  • flexibility
  • Clean code, close to the algorithm.
  • Fast
  • Handles GPUs, multiple GPUs on a single machine, CPUs, and Mac.
  • Versatile, can work efficiently on text/audio/image/tabular datasets.
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
  • Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Since pythonic if developing an app with pytorch as backend the response can be substantially slow and support is less compares to Tensorflow
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
Read full review
Open Source
The big advantage of PyTorch is how close it is to the algorithm. Oftentimes, it is easier to read Pytorch code than a given paper directly. I particularly like the object-oriented approach in model definition; it makes things very clean and easy to teach to software engineers.
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better business decisions and save cost to the company. It stacks up better as we know Python is more widely used than R in the industry and can be learnt easily. Unlike PyCharm jupyter notebooks can be used to make documentations and exported in a variety of formats.
Read full review
Open Source
Pytorch is very, very simple compared to TensorFlow. Simple to install, less dependency issues, and very small learning curve. TensorFlow is very much optimised for robust deployment but very complicated to train simple models and play around with the loss functions. It needs a lot of juggling around with the documentation. The research community also prefers PyTorch, so it becomes easy to find solutions to most of the problems. Keras is very simple and good for learning ML / DL. But when going deep into research or building some product that requires a lot of tweaks and experimentation, Keras is not suitable for that. May be good for proving some hypotheses but not good for rigorous experimentation with complex models.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
  • Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
  • Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration
Read full review
Open Source
  • The ability to make models as never before
  • Being able to control the bias of models was not done before the arrival of Pytorch in our company
Read full review
ScreenShots