Upland Kapost helps you create and distribute meaningful content to support the buyer journey for B2B companies.
$1
per month
Writesonic
Score9.8 out of 10
N/A
Writesonic is an AI-powered writing assistant that helps users write anything and publish anywhere. The vendor describes it as Canva for writing, with tools that simplify the process of creating, editing, and publishing articles, blog posts, ads, landing pages, eCommerce product descriptions, social media posts, and other forms of content.
$15
per month 1 user
Pricing
Kapost
Writesonic
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Short-form
$15
per month 1 user
Long-form
$19
per month 1 user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Kapost
Writesonic
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Kapost
Writesonic
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Kapost and Writesonic
Feature
Kapost
8.2
9 Ratings
5% above category average
Writesonic
-
Ratings
Ideation
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval workflows
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content collaboration
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content calendar
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Network for content licensing/production
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Kapost and Writesonic
Feature
Kapost
8.0
9 Ratings
2% above category average
Writesonic
-
Ratings
Content hub
7.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Forms / Gated content
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embedded CTAs
7.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content distribution
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content promotion
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content automation
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Kapost and Writesonic
Kapost has potential to be a great asset in small and large orgs. If you're not producing a great deal of content, or coordinating across a large team, there's still tremendous value, but it scales as your org scales because it makes it easier to coordinate and manage large teams and large content archives.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Writesonic is really good if you want to autogenerate articles based on available data on the internet. You can use it to do research, gather data, and much more. It also generartes quite impressive social media captions
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Filtering: If you make the most out of your custom details and custom fields, you can gain newfound access to materials that may have long been lost in the ether. It's really easy for us, for instance, to see all of our videos at once. Or everything targeting a certain buying stage. Or you can keyword search to see everything on one topic.
Workflows: It's really nice to lay out "who sees what when" in a digital way, because everyone involved on an asset can easily see what stage things are at. You can also set deadlines to tasks, which seems a bit more firm than a casual email, because you can visually see how meeting your deadline fits within the whole timeline.
Calendars: The calendar feature is nice for us because we have a blog, so we can see when everything is (supposed) to go live. It's easy to see when I, as a copy editor, should be expecting work, so I can align my day accordingly. Way better than the old-fashioned "mental note" system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Social media distribution needs improvement. Specifically a calendar for planned Tweets and a better way to schedule multiple shares of the same content.
System performance is somewhat slow.
Should be an easier way to make changes, like adding custom fields or publication destinations, to all content types, rather than one at a time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We are using some other systems that might have replaced Kapost, but none of them had the workflow functionality we were looking for. So, we're sticking with Kapost for now.
The calendar view is a great feature and so are the custom views. It is relatively easy to see a clear view of what content the user is responsible for and then the due dates associated to it. The ability to create and update workflows for the team is easy to navigate and keeps us on track.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The reputation of the product matches up to its reputation as one of the leaders in the space. I love that you can share and access content at your fingertips from anywhere. The downside is that it does not have the prettiest interface but you can get over this with its functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workfront has a lot of great features, but Kapost was the right tool for what we needed at the time. With a team of our size, we had to make sure we weren't biting off more than we could chew and the project never got off the ground. We had to be thoughtful with how we rolled it out.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info