Kevel vs. Magnite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kevel
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Kevel's (formerly Adzerk) APIs is designed to make it easy for engineers and PMs to build their own server-side, fully-customized ad server. E-retailers and user communities can use Kevel to build ad servers to promote anything from native ads to internal content to sponsored listings (where vendors and sellers pay for their organic listing to be promoted in search and browsing results). According to the vendor, engineers reliably see a significant reduction in dev time using Kevel’s APIs…N/A
Magnite
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Magnite (formerly Rubicon Project) is an independent sell-side advertising platform.N/A
Pricing
KevelMagnite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KevelMagnite
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing is customized based on feature needs, support needs, and monthly request volume.
More Pricing Information
Features
KevelMagnite
Ad Network Integration
Comparison of Ad Network Integration features of Product A and Product B
Kevel
10.0
1 Ratings
30% above category average
Magnite
7.5
2 Ratings
1% above category average
DSP integration10.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Data Transfer00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of Product A and Product B
Kevel
10.0
1 Ratings
25% above category average
Magnite
8.0
2 Ratings
2% above category average
Ad campaign creation10.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Ad deployment10.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Display advertising10.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Ad display and retargeting segmentation10.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Sequence targeting00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Ad Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Ad Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Kevel
9.2
1 Ratings
17% above category average
Magnite
7.3
2 Ratings
6% below category average
Ad dashboards9.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Ad performance reports9.01 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Ad conversion tracking10.01 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Ad attribution reporting9.01 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Cross-channel ad management9.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Ad forecasting and optimization00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
KevelMagnite
Small Businesses
Google Ad Manager
Google Ad Manager
Score 8.6 out of 10
Google Ad Manager
Google Ad Manager
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
The Trade Desk
The Trade Desk
Score 8.1 out of 10
The Trade Desk
The Trade Desk
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Adobe Advertising Cloud
Adobe Advertising Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
Adobe Advertising Cloud
Adobe Advertising Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KevelMagnite
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
KevelMagnite
Likelihood to Recommend
Kevel
For ad serving, implementing client-side header bidding with prebid was actually easier with Kevel than it is with Google Ad Manager in most cases, particularly for display advertising. I found though that with more complex integrations (like video), there were more solutions and code snippets available with other larger ad servers (Google).
Read full review
Magnite (Rubicon Project)
If a colleague needed a platform with fast customer service and detailed reporting to sell their mobile inventory then I would recommend Rubicon Project. However, if my colleague needed a platform that gave instant current reporting data then I would be less likely to recommend Rubicon Project to them.
Read full review
Pros
Kevel
  • More personable team that can address customizations needed to the product.
  • Easy to use interface.
  • Frequent product updates with notifications via email.
  • Well documented API.
Read full review
Magnite (Rubicon Project)
  • Cleanest supply ecosystem. They are skilled at processing inventory and bids in order to streamline monetization and drive yield.
  • Client support is excellent. Client services is deeply invested in your business and successful at driving key business goals within your organization when working on your behalf.
Read full review
Cons
Kevel
  • User interface could be faster to load.
Read full review
Magnite (Rubicon Project)
  • If possible to update the reporting to have less delay time on the data.
  • The reporting portal cuts off the bid request data after a period of time.
  • The UI seems to be a bit slower lately.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Kevel
Kevel was an easier initial implementation for header bidding with prebid. The team worked alongside us to make sure everything was operating as intended. We ultimately switched to Ads Manager to access AdX demand and other features that were not possible with Kevel (for instance, EBDA). There are benefits to both but I appreciated the attention we got from Kevel support when we were first working through the implementation. We are still using Kevel for many things, just not as our primary display advertising ad server.
Read full review
Magnite (Rubicon Project)
Rubicon had superior client services and monetization techniques.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Kevel
  • Kevel enabled us to get up and running with client side header bidding when our team was still small and the technology was still new. This improved our ability to monetize our inventory.
Read full review
Magnite (Rubicon Project)
  • Rubicon Project has made it easier to optimize so that we could get the fullest ROI on our inventory through their alerts on which deal needs troubleshooting.
  • They also send a daily report which notifies you which advertisers have low render rate which is very helpful when figuring which creatives need to troubleshooting.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Kevel Screenshots

Screenshot of Adzerk homepageScreenshot of Decision API JSON exampleScreenshot of Management API example