Leapsome is a platform for Performance Management & Employee Engagement. CEOs and HR / People Operations teams in companies such as Trivago, Babbel and Mercedes-Benz choose Leapsome to enhance their people management processes. With Leapsome, you develop employees across your organisation.
Leapsome combines tools for Goals & OKRs Management, Performance Reviews and 360s, Employee Engagement Surveys, Instant Feedback & Praise, and 1-on-1 Meetings into one easy to use and customizable…
$6
per month
Proliant
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Proliant provides a cloud-based human capital management solution designed to simplify payroll and HR processes, improves accuracy, and ensures industry compliance. Proliant is an all-in-one solution for workforce and talent management across the entire employment life cycle. Specializing in payroll, Proliant helps users pay people accurately, on time, and without risk from the IRS, supporting tax filings, contractor payments, and unlimited payroll runs. Proliant also streamlines…
N/A
Pricing
Leapsome
Proliant
Editions & Modules
Modular
$6
per month
Enterprise
custom pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Leapsome
Proliant
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Leapsome
Proliant
Features
Leapsome
Proliant
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Leapsome
6.2
3 Ratings
20% below category average
Proliant
7.2
10 Ratings
11% below category average
Corporate goal setting
7.03 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
5.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
8.03 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
4.03 Ratings
7.19 Ratings
Performance tracking
7.03 Ratings
7.69 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Leapsome
7.7
3 Ratings
8% below category average
Proliant
8.2
13 Ratings
4% above category average
Performance plans
8.03 Ratings
8.113 Ratings
Plan weighting
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
6.03 Ratings
8.313 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
8.03 Ratings
8.113 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
9.52 Ratings
8.211 Ratings
Reporting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
8.412 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Leapsome
-
Ratings
Proliant
7.7
23 Ratings
5% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
9.721 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.822 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
6.620 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
8.822 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
5.916 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
7.117 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
7.217 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Leapsome
-
Ratings
Proliant
9.0
22 Ratings
10% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.922 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
7.411 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
9.820 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
8.115 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
9.921 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
9.720 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
7.914 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Leapsome
-
Ratings
Proliant
6.6
21 Ratings
21% below category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
4.419 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
7.920 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
7.516 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Leapsome
-
Ratings
Proliant
8.7
22 Ratings
6% above category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
9.822 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
9.822 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
8.317 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
7.513 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
7.915 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Leapsome
-
Ratings
Proliant
7.4
12 Ratings
8% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.412 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Leapsome
-
Ratings
Proliant
9.1
22 Ratings
19% above category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
9.821 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
9.822 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
7.612 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Leapsome
-
Ratings
Proliant
8.6
20 Ratings
8% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.719 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
9.618 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Leapsome
-
Ratings
Proliant
7.2
9 Ratings
9% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.59 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
7.59 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
It will be an apt tool where only performance management is the requirement of the company in case there is no such tool in place. Like for a startup where the tool is yet to implement, this can help in managing the performance management with ease and a simple interface. Within a large organization where the requirements are beyond performance management, this tool will fall short
Overall, I would generally recommend Proliant to a colleague as I think the system and structure has great bones and is generally very easy to use. However, if a colleague was needing a system with a robust reporting system or access to immediate support, I would be less likely to recommend the system.
Reporting is limited to data that is pulled by pay period--not by date worked, so if trying to determine how much an employee earned during a quarter--you have to calculate this manually
Employee records are limited to admin only viewing--so managers can not see payrates, upload documents to employee files or update expiration dates to licenses, etc
User guides in the knowledge base are out of date and don't cover the recent updates to the system--or outline processes that are no defunct
Limited integrations with other HR platforms are available. Ex--outside ATS, candidate assessment tools
Proliant is pretty easy to maneuver and get used to. There are some things than can be tedious but nothing too difficult where you have to spend hours to get it to work. The payroll processing is pretty straightforward and that's the core reason why we use their software.
I didn’t select over workday since this was used in the previous organization. The major difference is that workday provides multiple functions which leapsome currently doesn’t have or have it and I am not aware of it may be. However, I still recommend Leapsome over workday since its simple interface is effective to users. It is a user friendly tool that can still produce multiple KPI and reports which are required for people management
Proliant is the only payroll software I have used, and I don't plan on changing that anytime soon. It gives me everything I need in simple, easy-to-use software. If I have questions they have quality customer service. I get calls weekly to change to other payroll services, and I don't consider changing because there is no need to change - I have everything I need here. Proliant does exactly the job I am looking for it to do.
i am not able to give this information because I don't believe our firm fully uses Proliant
I was just made aware of some of the benefits Proliant can offer through this survey
The only negative is that when the "pre-wire" requirement was activated this year, we were not told ahead of time and it caused a lot of confusion and delay when we tried to process the first partner payroll in January.