CxEngage is a cloud contact center solution designed to meet users' needs and
work in their environment. Unlike monolithic architectures and on-premises
solutions, CxEngage is a ‘born-in-the-cloud’ platform to deliver unified visibility
across voice, video, and digital channels. CxEngage is designed to just work
anywhere, and to be implemented in a few days or weeks.
$85
per month per user
Net2Phone
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Net2Phone is a VoIP solutions provider headdquartered in Newark, whose services include Hosted PBX, unified communications for remote workforces including live calling, live chat, and also web conferencing through their Huddle app available now in beta release, Microsoft Teams direct routing, and SIP Trunking which integrates directly into on-prem or existing IP PBX systems.
$24.99
per month per user
Pricing
Lifesize CxEngage
Net2Phone
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Office
$24.99
per month per user
Office Pro
$26.99
per month per user
Office Power
$29.99
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lifesize CxEngage
Net2Phone
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Lifesize CxEngage
Net2Phone
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
Lifesize CxEngage
6.9
2 Ratings
19% below category average
Net2Phone
-
Ratings
Agent dashboard
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Outbound response
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call forwarding
6.41 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive voice response
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
REST APIs
6.41 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call tracking
7.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multichannel integration
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM software integration
6.41 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
Lifesize CxEngage
7.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
Net2Phone
-
Ratings
Inbound call routing
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recording
8.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call analytics
6.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Historical reporting
5.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Live reporting
6.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
CxEngage can handle some more complex flow options that other vendors don't seem to be able to do. The integration for voice calls with Salesforce is a huge plus. The integration of email support with Salesforce is a BIG miss. After fighting with it for a year, we finally just turned it off and use Salesforce Omnichannel for email support. Chat using Salesforce Live Agent worked fine enough.
As the price is so low and the quality is good, you can't really fault anything plus, they provide the best SMS service, with high sound quality; nothing compares to the price, and they also provide ongoing customer support.
Stronger support and more reliable system for users not on a commercial network
Consumer friendly and intuitive reporting and dashboard tools. build canned reports
Reporting: Ability to get a combined SVL for all queues included on a report (now we manually calculate after exporting the report into excel). Same for all major data points (ASA, AHT, etc.)
Ability to include abandoned calls and an abandonment percentage which excludes short abandons on the Queue summary report. Now the report just shows total abandons and abandonment percentage so if we want to exclude short abandons we have to pull a separate report to find out how many calls abandoned in less than 10 seconds then calculate the "true abandoned number" (calls abandoned minus short abandons)
Ability to change what is considered a "short abandon" and then report on it. Right now the only option is the built in tracking of calls that abandoned in equal to or less than 10 seconds.
Ability to "save" an agents "default" skill profile so that any changes we make can be returned to "BAU" with a click of a button
quicker data/historical report retrieval
way to separate what we have listed as a queue name for reporting vs. what is used for the queue name in the "whisper" (the issue we had with WT queue naming conventions because we had to have the whisper be super precise)
I think at performance level it is still to be improved as many time we face hang issues but i think that can be imrpoved soon by the company
Having different configuration UIs on Web/App/Cloud, where it makes difficult to remmeber the exact places where to make changes. THere should be some syncing in configuration options
We implemented in 2018 and were only given 8 weeks to do it...as per the direction of our parent company at the time. Serenova at the time responded well and we were able to go Live within 8-weeks...albeit the product overall was a big change and had gaps in features over our previous contact management solution.
It's been too many years...I don't remember. Except in 2021 we looked briefly at Amazon and Salesforce call center offerings. Both were too basic at the time that even if we got a great deal on licensing (we are a Salesforce house for other things), we couldn't easily (or at all) do things like Callbacks and some of the more robust flow buildouts that we have in place today with Lifesize.