ELEARNINGFORCE in Edgewater brings learning management to Office 365 and SharePoint. LMS365 blends with the Microsoft infrastructure and is designed to eliminate expensive integration, time-consuming development, and unwanted complexity. Learners access learning plans, courses, personal progress reports, and certificates from within the SharePoint business process.
N/A
symplr Talent Management Solutions
Score7.2 out of 10
N/A
symplr acquired HealthcareSource in July, 2021. The former HealthcareSource now forms the foundation fo the symplr talent management suite.
N/A
Pricing
LMS365
symplr Talent Management Solutions
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LMS365
symplr Talent Management Solutions
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
LMS365
symplr Talent Management Solutions
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of LMS365 and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Feature
LMS365
8.7
4 Ratings
5% above category average
symplr Talent Management Solutions
8.4
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Course authoring
7.63 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Course catalog or library
8.24 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Player/Portal
8.44 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Learning content
8.24 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Mobile friendly
8.72 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications
9.54 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Assignments
9.24 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Compliance management
9.74 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Learning administration
10.04 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics
5.54 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Social learning
8.23 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Gamification
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Single Sign On (SSO) Enabled Learning
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of LMS365 and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Feature
LMS365
-
Ratings
symplr Talent Management Solutions
9.2
2 Ratings
24% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of LMS365 and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Feature
LMS365
-
Ratings
symplr Talent Management Solutions
8.1
2 Ratings
10% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
8.42 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of LMS365 and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Feature
LMS365
-
Ratings
symplr Talent Management Solutions
9.0
1 Ratings
27% above category average
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of LMS365 and symplr Talent Management Solutions
Feature
LMS365
-
Ratings
symplr Talent Management Solutions
6.5
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of LMS365 and symplr Talent Management Solutions
If a customer does not have SharePoint the entry in that kind of solution is a bit harder as the use of SharePoint can be so broad. It does not mean it is not the right solution as a company can use SharePoint LMS to start with and then expand to other functions and features. I strongly recommend to use SharePoint Standard or Enterprise and forgo the "free" SharePoint version as a) SharePoint's core functions and features are greatly enhanced in these two premium versions and b) more and more SharePoint LMS functions make use of these core Standard and Enterprise features in the future, like taxonomy, user profiles, etc. In general with all project it is as well recommended to have the full buy in by upper management and that the project initiative is fully supported. Adding such a solution (SharePoint LMS or any other LMS solution) will require the team not only to have a good plan on how the requirements can be achieved from a technical point of view, but how a training program can be rolled out to an organization of 5, 500, 5.000 or 50.000. The technical deployment of SharePoint LMS is measurable (I would say between 1-4 weeks based on the complexity, scale of the environment). 1-2 weeks of training (depending on the base knowledge of SharePoint in the company and the need to add knowledge of SharePoint LMS). That's it. Technically you are ready. If needed, any custom work, integration and development work comes on top. Where customer struggle is the availability and dedication of their own teams. Course content needs to be created, how should a course look like, what are the parameters, what are top ten things needed moving a course which was taught in a class room, but now to be delivered online. Buying the licenses is one thing, getting the solution up and running form a technical point of view is another, making it YOURS is the challenge!
If their HRIS system holds all their data - employees, supervisors, positions then HealthcareSource can really take advantage of that data and save you a lot of time. We looked at a lot of systems and one of our needs was both Applicant Tracking and Performance Management and these systems work very well together. Other systems we looked at didn't have all our most needed features - we needed a vendor that could do both, integrate with our HRIS, report back data in a customizable fashion, and be user friendly. Some systems listed the features but during the demo and product reference calls we found they didn't perform as advertised. Some had reporting but the reporting was missing key data or didn't export in a data friendly manner. We have found HealthcareSource to be not only "pretty" - aka user friendly/non-cluttered but also had the engine under the hood as well that met our data analyst needs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
When any company implements a new program they have specific needs that they want customized for them. Healthcare source did a great job providing excellent customer service to our HR and IT professionals working behind the scenes to help us maximize the programs potential at our organization. They did not limit us to any standard uses or prohibit us from reaching our internal goals. Some examples include specialized reports, data uploads of employee data and time frames for our annual reviews.
They provided us with training and retraining and more training on using the system. This included training new members of our team when we had turnover in HR and inviting us to conferences and webcasts regularly.
The presentation of the software was very appealing and that may seem small but it really helps appeal to the employees that use it for their reviews.
When the user clicks into a different portion of the file library and then needs to return to a previous class the software forces you to go all the way back to the beginning of the coursework, this isn’t that painful just annoying.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is very simple for me: As I said, I am (we are) selling and consulting around SharePoint LMS. SharePoint LMS is a killer application which needs to be in every company which has a vision and mission to deliver and create knowledge. So you can say Thomas (me) is biased, but I only encourage you to check out the solution to hear what we have to say and stack our solution against the other solutions out there.
Looking back we can say that every year we used Performance Manager and other products too like HeathcareSource's Compensation and Position Manager we saw the ease of use for employees and HR staff members increase, we saw employees getting more comfortable with the product and HR Staff getting better at expressing their needs to the HealthcareSource team and this made us want to stay with the same company, when things are getting better each year we know we are in the right place.
Ultimately, in my opinion LMS365 is a bit clunky to use. It has most of the features you need, but most need to be configured by your technology department, e.g., SSO, user groups in Entra ID, notifications through Slack, teams, etc. If you're looking for an all-in-one solution, look elsewhere, as lms365 has several catches to its proposition.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The few times we actually needed support generally were during major upgrades of the system and getting a quick handle on how the configuration changed were the primary reasons.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
On the previous rating scale, I kept thinking "it depends". If I know it's an easy question or easy fix, the response is super fast. If I know I am asking something complex, custom or I just know it's not going to be able to be answered by 1st tier, it can take some time. I have worked on these issues with them (they are all very nice) I do now have avenues for finding things out from one person. We had one issue where we had a major problem and it required a software patch and their support team worked throughout the weekend to create, QA, and deliver the patch as promised. I was very impressed
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I will pick EdApp or Totara if you're after an all-in-one LMS solution that is feature-rich. For a university educational setting, Moodle continues to make sense. Safety Culture now owns EdApp, so over time, these platforms will likely be merged. LMS needs a huge overhaul to catch up.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Both Health Stream and Healthcare Source have to-do lists, completion lists, and tracking. However, the functionality of Healthcare Source is far superior to HealthStream. The notifications are much better and helpful. The tracking on Healthcare Source is easy to use and see. Overall the interface in Healthcare Source is more intuitive.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
NetLearning has increased our nursing CEU credits with the most efficiency. Now nurses can take courses on NetLearning and have it track their hours.
On a compliance standpoint, NetLearning has benefited us when we are being audited and we have to show what trainings or classes an employee has made. Also, to make sure that their certifications are up to date.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info